Ernest, D.J.; Lange, H.R.: INFOTRAC and WILSONDISC : a comparison of new technologies (1989)
0.02
0.01554427 = product of:
0.07772135 = sum of:
0.07772135 = weight(_text_:cd in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07772135 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.051653754 = queryNorm
0.36468402 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Describes InfoTrac (on laserdisc) and WILSONDISC (on CD-ROM), wich currently represent the only efforts to bring general periodical literature to end-users, and reports on the published reactions of librarians and users to these 2 products, as well as presenting a comparison of their search techniques and presentation of information to end-users. Reports from the field indicate that WILSONDISC is proving to be as popular with users as InfoTrac, and although the 2 systems provide different approaches to the presentation of general periodical citations, undergraduates appear able to adapt with little difficulty.