Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ford, N."
  1. Ford, N.: ¬The growth of understanding in information science : towards a developmental model (1999) 0.01
    0.013996742 = product of:
      0.069983706 = sum of:
        0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069983706 = score(doc=4342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    17. 1.2000 13:16:22
  2. Ford, N.: Introduction to information behaviour (2015) 0.01
    0.013996742 = product of:
      0.069983706 = sum of:
        0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069983706 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:45:48
  3. Ford, N.; Wood, F.; Walsh, C.: Cognitive styles and searching (1994) 0.01
    0.013739325 = product of:
      0.068696626 = sum of:
        0.068696626 = weight(_text_:cd in 2420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068696626 = score(doc=2420,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.3223382 = fieldWeight in 2420, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2420)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The primary aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the absence of postings information on online searches and searching behaviour and these results were reported in Journal of information science 20(1994) no.1. The secondary aim, reported here, was to assess the cognitive styles of the participants to ensure that the population was sufficiently vareid in this respect and to investigate possible correlations between cognitive ability and searching behaviour. Throughout the project, searches were made by postgraduates at the department of information studies, University of Sheffield using the LISA database on CD-ROM. A total of 67 searchers carried out 275 searches, both with and without postings information. Reports significant differences in both searching behaviour and search outcomes obtained by those with different learning styles, with and without postings information. Significant correlations were found between cognitice styles and online searching. Searchers characterized by different learning styles tend to adopt different search strategies and strategies associated with comprehension and operation learning styles result in qualitatively different searching performance. Searching approaches associated with a versatile style are the most effective. Making feedback in the form of postings available enables comprehension and operation learners, and field independent searchers, to change their apporach in qualitatively different ways. Other findings are reported and discussed
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 18(1994) no.2, S.79-86
  4. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Walsh, C.: ¬The effect of postings information on search behaviour (1994) 0.01
    0.011658204 = product of:
      0.058291018 = sum of:
        0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058291018 = score(doc=6890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    How postings information is used for inverted file searching was investigated by comparing searches, made by postgraduate students at the Dept. of Information Studies, of the LISA database on CD-ROM with and without postings information. Performance (the number of relevant references, precision and recall) was not significantly different but searches with postings information took more time, and more sets were viewed, than in searches without postings. Postings information was used to make decisions to narrow or broaden the search; to view or print the references. The same techniques were used to amend searches whether or not postings information was available. Users decided that a search was satisfactory on the basis of the search results, and consequently many searches done without postings were still considered satisfactory. However, searchers thought that the lack of postings information had affected 90% of their searches. Differences in search performance and searching behaviour were found in participants who were shown to have different learning styles using the Witkin's Embedded Figures test and the Lancaster Short Inventory of Approaches to Learning Test. These differences were, in part, explained by the differences in behaviour indicated by their learning styles
  5. Woods, F.; Walsh, C.; Ford, N.: Effects of postings information on user searching behaviour (1994) 0.01
    0.011658204 = product of:
      0.058291018 = sum of:
        0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058291018 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an investigation, undertaken at Sheffield University, Departmant of Information Studies, UK into the effects of postings information (the display on the screen of the number of references in the retrieved sets) on searching behaviour. Linked online searches were conducted, on the LISA database on CD-ROM, with and without postings information. Performance in terms of the number of relevant references, precision and recall was not significantly different whether postings information was available or not; but searches with postings information took more time and more sets were viewed than in searches without postings. Searchers thought that the lack of postings information had affected 90% of their searches. Proposes that training should place greater emphasis on the value of postings information at different stages of the search and should optimize the searching behaviour of those with different searching styles
  6. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92