Lardy, J.P.; Herzhaft, L.: Bibliometric treatments according to bibliographic errors and data heterogenity : the end-user point of view (1992)
0.01
0.013601236 = product of:
0.06800618 = sum of:
0.06800618 = weight(_text_:cd in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06800618 = score(doc=5064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.051653754 = queryNorm
0.3190985 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The quality of online and CD-ROM databases is far from satisfactory. Errors are frequently found in listings from online searches. Spelling mistakes are the most common but there are also more misleading errors such as variations of an author's name or absence of homogenity in the content of certain field. Describes breifly a bibliometric study of large amounts of data downloaded from databases to investigate bibliographic errors and data heterogeneity. Recommends that database producers should consider either the implementation of a common format or the recommendations of the Société Française de Bibliométrie
