Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Large, A."
  1. Large, A.: Design aspects of menu-driven search software for CD-ROMs (1990) 0.03
    0.027202472 = product of:
      0.13601236 = sum of:
        0.13601236 = weight(_text_:cd in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13601236 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.638197 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  2. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Breuleux, A.: ¬A comparison of information retrieval from print and CD-ROM versions of an encyclopedia by elementary school students (1994) 0.03
    0.027202472 = product of:
      0.13601236 = sum of:
        0.13601236 = weight(_text_:cd in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13601236 = score(doc=1015,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.638197 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an experiment using 48 sixth-grade students to compare retrieval techniques using the print and CD-ROM versions of Compton's Encyclopedia. Four queries of defferent complexity (measured by the numer of terms present) were searched by the students after a short training session. The searches were timed and the retrieval steps and search terms were noted. The searches were no faster on the CD-ROM than the print version, but in both cases time was related directly to the number of terms involved. The students coped well with the CD-ROM interface and its several retrieval paths
  3. Large, A.: ¬The user interface to CD-ROM databases (1991) 0.03
    0.026923468 = product of:
      0.13461734 = sum of:
        0.13461734 = weight(_text_:cd in 3840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13461734 = score(doc=3840,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.6316513 = fieldWeight in 3840, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3840)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses CD-ROM user interfaces of specific types: dialogue transaction (command languages; command menus; direct manipulation and natural language); input devices (keyload, mouse, touch screen and voice); display features (layout, colour, sound and response time); user assistance (error messages, on-screen help tutorials and manuals); and reliabiliy and robustness
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Schwersky, U.: Zur Problematik der Gestaltung von CD-ROM-Benutzeroberflächen
  4. Large, A.: Multimedia and the acquisition of information (1992) 0.02
    0.0201926 = product of:
      0.100963004 = sum of:
        0.100963004 = weight(_text_:cd in 4638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100963004 = score(doc=4638,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.47373846 = fieldWeight in 4638, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4638)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the methodology and reports the results of a study to measure text comprehension by school students when using a variety of media. Four different texts in the printed multi volume Compton's Encyclopedia and its multimedia CD-ROM database equivalent were read by grade 6 (11-12 year old) students who were then asked several multiple choice questions on them. Three groups, print, text on screen and multimedia (text, illustration and video), were asked only to read the texts presented to them. Two additional groups, print and multimedia CD-ROM, had to retrieve the texts before reading them. No significant main effect was found for multimedia over print or text on screen. However, a significant interaction was found between the use of multimedia and text complexity. Boys were found to cope markedly better with multimedia CD-ROM, a finding which was not expected and ran counter to the results of previous studies
  5. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Breuleux, A.: Multimedia and comprehension : a cognitive study (1994) 0.01
    0.011658204 = product of:
      0.058291018 = sum of:
        0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 7754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058291018 = score(doc=7754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 7754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7754)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Tests were carried out on 120 grade 6 students to compare Compton's Multimedia Encyclopedia on CD-ROM and its printe equivalent in terms of students' ability to recall information and to draw inferences from it. Between-subject varaibles were 3 presentation conditions (printed text with illustrations, text-on-screen, and multimedia-text, still images, and animation) and a retrieval condition (topic retrieved before viewing / topic presented without retrieval). Within-subject variables were text complexity (complex or simple), text type (descriptive or procedural), and measure (propositions recalled versus propositions inferred). Presentation conditions produced no significant main effect although text-on-screen resulted in somewhat higher recall and multimedia resulted in somewhat higher inference scores. Multimedia had the greatest effect in the case of simple topics, and especially the simple procedural topic
  6. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002) 0.01
    0.008398045 = product of:
      0.041990224 = sum of:
        0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041990224 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2005 10:34:22
  7. Cole, C.; Behesthi, J.; Large, A.; Lamoureux, I.; Abuhimed, D.; AlGhamdi, M.: Seeking information for a middle school history project : the concept of implicit knowledge in the students' transition from Kuhlthau's Stage 3 to Stage 4 (2013) 0.01
    0.006998371 = product of:
      0.034991853 = sum of:
        0.034991853 = weight(_text_:22 in 667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034991853 = score(doc=667,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051653754 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 667, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=667)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:41:17