Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

Brehde, D.: Nachschlag erwünscht : wie ein deutscher Wörterbuchschatz auf die CD-ROM kam (1995) 0.03

0.027202472 = product of:
  0.13601236 = sum of:
    0.13601236 = weight(_text_:cd in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13601236 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.638197 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Kellsey, C.: Cataloging with Bibliofile : alternative to the bibliographic utilities for small college libraries (1998) 0.01
```
0.013601236 = product of:
  0.06800618 = sum of:
    0.06800618 = weight(_text_:cd in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06800618 = score(doc=5177,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.3190985 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Bibliofile is a CD-ROM cataloguing product that provides LC MARC records. Available databases include English only, foreign language materials, audio-visual materials, as well as several that are more specialized. Bibliofile runs on a PC that may be connected to a network. Advantages over an online utility include lower cost, no telecommunication problems, no slow response times, fixed subscription rates with no hourly use charges, easy installation, searching and editing and good phone support. Disadvantages include no member-contributed records and no member holdings to use for interlibrary loan. A library should consider type and level of materials catalogued, existence of an interface with a local OPAC, total cataloguing time used, and other sources for ILL searching when considering bibliofile as a cataloguing alternative

Bredack, J.: Terminologieextraktion von Mehrwortgruppen in kunsthistorischen Fachtexten (2013) 0.01

0.006800618 = product of:
  0.03400309 = sum of:
    0.03400309 = weight(_text_:cd in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03400309 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.15954925 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content: Beiliegende CD enthält die Arbeitsergebnisse und Hilfsdateien

Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.00
```
0.0041990224 = product of:
  0.020995112 = sum of:
    0.020995112 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020995112 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Content

As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.

Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes