Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Breuleux, A.: ¬A comparison of information retrieval from print and CD-ROM versions of an encyclopedia by elementary school students (1994) 0.03 
    0.027202472 = product of:
  0.13601236 = sum of:
    0.13601236 = weight(_text_:cd in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13601236 = score(doc=1015,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.638197 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Describes an experiment using 48 sixth-grade students to compare retrieval techniques using the print and CD-ROM versions of Compton's Encyclopedia. Four queries of defferent complexity (measured by the numer of terms present) were searched by the students after a short training session. The searches were timed and the retrieval steps and search terms were noted. The searches were no faster on the CD-ROM than the print version, but in both cases time was related directly to the number of terms involved. The students coped well with the CD-ROM interface and its several retrieval paths
  2. Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996) 0.03 
    0.027202472 = product of:
  0.13601236 = sum of:
    0.13601236 = weight(_text_:cd in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13601236 = score(doc=6768,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.638197 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases
    Object
    BNB-CD
  3. Van der Walt, H.E.A.; Brakel, P.A. van: Method for the evaluation of the retrieval effectiveness of a CD-ROM bibliographic database (1991) 0.02 
    0.023558034 = product of:
  0.11779017 = sum of:
    0.11779017 = weight(_text_:cd in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11779017 = score(doc=3114,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.55269486 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Addresses the problem of how potential users of CD-ROM data bases can objectively establish which version of the same data base is best suited for a specific situation. The problem was solved by applying the retrieval effectiveness of current on-line data base search systems as a standard measurement. 5 search queries from the medical sciences were presented by experienced users of MEDLINE. Search strategies were written for both DIALOG and DATA-STAR. Search results were compared to create a recall base from documents present in both on-line searches. This recall base was then used to establish the retrieval and precision of 4 CD-ROM data bases: MEDLINE, Compact Cambrdge MEDLINE, DIALOG OnDisc, Comprehensive MEDLINE/EBSCO
  4. Crawford, G.A.: Varieties of access : a comparison of databases via Z39.50, FirstSearch and CD-ROM (1996) 0.02 
    0.021982921 = product of:
  0.1099146 = sum of:
    0.1099146 = weight(_text_:cd in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1099146 = score(doc=5655,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5157411 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    3 versions of 2 databases were used as examples for examining indexing, printing/downloading capabilities, and interface design in order to provide the most useful resources to the faculty, staff, and students of Penn State Harrisburg. The databases studied were ABI/Inform and PAIS available using a Z39.50 interface from the library's OPAC, FirstSearch from OCLC, and CD-ROMs from UMI and SilverPlatter
  5. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  6. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  7. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02 
    0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  8. Jascó, P.: CD-ROM commentaries : the speed of the retrieval software (1996) 0.02 
    0.019235056 = product of:
  0.096175276 = sum of:
    0.096175276 = weight(_text_:cd in 6992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096175276 = score(doc=6992,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.45127347 = fieldWeight in 6992, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6992)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Smart retrieval software can have more impact on response time than a faster CD-ROM drive. This can be shown easily now that more commerical databases are being released in several versions with practically identical content but different software. Illustrates this with 3 versions of the PAIS database, comparing the original OCSI, SPIRS software, and EBSCO software. Whereas the OCSI version took no more than a few seconds, the other 2 versions took around 10times longer, occasionally in the order of minutes. Considers how the construction of these products can account for such speed differences. However, search facilities and other features should be considered as well as speed. Offers advice for testing retrieval software
  9. Harman, D.K.: ¬The first text retrieval conference : TREC-1, 1992 (1993) 0.02 
    0.01554427 = product of:
  0.07772135 = sum of:
    0.07772135 = weight(_text_:cd in 1317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07772135 = score(doc=1317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.36468402 = fieldWeight in 1317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1317)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reports on the 1st Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-1) held in Rockville, MD, 4-6 Nov. 1992. The TREC experiment is being run by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to allow information retrieval researchers to scale up from small collection of data to larger sized experiments. Gropus of researchers have been provided with text documents compressed on CD-ROM. They used experimental retrieval system to search the text and evaluate the results
  10. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.01 
    0.013996742 = product of:
  0.069983706 = sum of:
    0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069983706 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  11. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.01 
    0.013996742 = product of:
  0.069983706 = sum of:
    0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069983706 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  12. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.01 
    0.013996742 = product of:
  0.069983706 = sum of:
    0.069983706 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069983706 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.22-25
  13. Allen, B.: Logical reasoning and retrieval performance (1993) 0.01 
    0.013601236 = product of:
  0.06800618 = sum of:
    0.06800618 = weight(_text_:cd in 5093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06800618 = score(doc=5093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.3190985 = fieldWeight in 5093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5093)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Tests the logical reasoning ability of end users of a CD-ROM index and assesses associations between different levels of this ability and aspects of retrieval performance. Users' selection of vocabulary and their selection of citations for further examination are both influenced by this ability. The designs of information systems should address the effects of logical reasoning on search behaviour. People with lower levels of logical reasoning ability may experience difficulty using systems in which user selectivity plays an important role. Other systems, such as those with ranked output, may decrease the need for users to make selections and would be easier to use for people with lower levels of logical reasoning ability
  14. Spink, A.; Greisdorf, H.: Users' partial relevance judgements during online searching (1997) 0.01 
    0.013601236 = product of:
  0.06800618 = sum of:
    0.06800618 = weight(_text_:cd in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06800618 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.3190985 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 21(1997) no.5, S.271-280
  15. Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Walsh, C.: ¬The effect of postings information on search behaviour (1994) 0.01 
    0.011658204 = product of:
  0.058291018 = sum of:
    0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 6890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058291018 = score(doc=6890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 6890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6890)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    How postings information is used for inverted file searching was investigated by comparing searches, made by postgraduate students at the Dept. of Information Studies, of the LISA database on CD-ROM with and without postings information. Performance (the number of relevant references, precision and recall) was not significantly different but searches with postings information took more time, and more sets were viewed, than in searches without postings. Postings information was used to make decisions to narrow or broaden the search; to view or print the references. The same techniques were used to amend searches whether or not postings information was available. Users decided that a search was satisfactory on the basis of the search results, and consequently many searches done without postings were still considered satisfactory. However, searchers thought that the lack of postings information had affected 90% of their searches. Differences in search performance and searching behaviour were found in participants who were shown to have different learning styles using the Witkin's Embedded Figures test and the Lancaster Short Inventory of Approaches to Learning Test. These differences were, in part, explained by the differences in behaviour indicated by their learning styles
  16. Sen, B.K.: ¬An inquiry into the information retrieval efficiency of LISA PLUS database (1996) 0.01 
    0.011658204 = product of:
  0.058291018 = sum of:
    0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 6640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058291018 = score(doc=6640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 6640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6640)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to compare the efficiency of the computerized searching of LISA Plus and Currents Research in Library and Information Science (CRLIS) with manual searching of the printed version of LISA. The study focused on articles covering the library and information science profession (LIS), published in Asian library and information science periodicals. The first stage was to identify Asian LIS periodicals using the Ulrich's Plus CD-ROM database. Computerized searching involved 2 methods; straightforward creation of sets for every periodical title; and browsing of brief citations of abstracts of all articles identified as being on the library profession published in the 1993 LISA. The manual searching involved browsing section 2.0 profession for all 11 issues of the printed LISA. Examines the reasons why computeroized searches took more time and retrieved less number of items. Suggests measures whereby the efficiency of computerized searches can be increased and concludes that to ensure comprehensive recall of relevant items, a combination of manual and computerized search is indispensible
  17. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01 
    0.011197394 = product of:
  0.055986967 = sum of:
    0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055986967 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  18. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01 
    0.011197394 = product of:
  0.055986967 = sum of:
    0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055986967 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  19. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01 
    0.011197394 = product of:
  0.055986967 = sum of:
    0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055986967 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  20. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01 
    0.011197394 = product of:
  0.055986967 = sum of:
    0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055986967 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 38
  • s 2
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes