Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.05232367 = product of:
  0.13080917 = sum of:
    0.102815695 = weight(_text_:cd in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102815695 = score(doc=286,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.48243165 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
    0.027993483 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027993483 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users

Date

22. 3.2002 8:51:28

0.03108854 = product of:
  0.1554427 = sum of:
    0.1554427 = weight(_text_:cd in 3640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1554427 = score(doc=3640,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.72936803 = fieldWeight in 3640, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3640)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Members of the reference staff of the North Carolina University at Chapel Hill, Davis Library, conducted a month-long electronic survey of users of the U-search CD-ROM service in spring 91. Evaluates the 1.135 responses to a variety of questions pertaining to public service issues, user attitudes towards CD-ROM searching, and the place of CD-ROM within the overall research strategy

0.023558034 = product of:
  0.11779017 = sum of:
    0.11779017 = weight(_text_:cd in 8103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11779017 = score(doc=8103,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.55269486 = fieldWeight in 8103, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8103)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

At the start of the academic year reference staff are hard pressed to provide sufficient assistance to first time users of CD-ROMs, who have missed bibliographic instruction classes, or who need more guidance before searching. The literature on CD-ROMs was reviewed, and a survey conducted to estimate the training needs of searchers. It was found that 100% of the inexperienced searchers required assistance while searching, and 50% of their search strategies were later rated as poor. More than half the experienced searchers also needed the librarians assistance, and 31% of this group demonstrated a poor understanding of searching techniques. The survey findings were incorporated into CDIntro, a computer assisted learning package designed by the authors

0.019595439 = product of:
  0.09797719 = sum of:
    0.09797719 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09797719 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 1.2000 17:52:11

0.01679609 = product of:
  0.08398045 = sum of:
    0.08398045 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08398045 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

9. 2.2008 17:52:22

0.013601236 = product of:
  0.06800618 = sum of:
    0.06800618 = weight(_text_:cd in 2527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06800618 = score(doc=2527,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.3190985 = fieldWeight in 2527, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2527)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

An 2 biowissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen der Grundlagenforschung, dem Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin, Berlin-Buch und dem Leibniz-Institut für Neurobiologie, Magdeburg, wurden 1997 bzw. 1998 Nutzerbefragungen durchgeführt. Obwohl die untersuchten Gruppen beträchtliche Altersunterschiede aufwiesen, ergeben sich einheitliche Trends: für etwa 2/3 der Wissenschaftler ist gegenwärtig die Nutzung von Printmedien und elektronischen Informationsofferten gleichwertig, während etwa 15% der Befragten letzteren den Vorzug geben. Bei der Datenbanknutzung ist festzustellen, daß MEDLINE die überragende Position sowohl bei der CD-ROM als auch Online im Internet einnimmt

0.011658204 = product of:
  0.058291018 = sum of:
    0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058291018 = score(doc=1519,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Reports of a study in a Chilean university library, comparing 100 users of online databases and CD-ROMs with 100 users of non-computerized bibliographical resources. Results showed that users tended to be teachers / researchers, and potential users were postgraduate students. Comparison of search results showed online searching improved results and saved time. The chief reasons for non-use were ignorance of the service and use of own personal computer. The study indicated the need to review policy on database acquisition and improve promotion of the service. In general, librarians should motivate greater use of online searching by providing skilled intermediary services to maximize uptake

0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 2747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=2747,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2747, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2747)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2009 18:54:15