Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.022394788 = product of:
  0.111973934 = sum of:
    0.111973934 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111973934 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.01979438 = product of:
  0.0989719 = sum of:
    0.0989719 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0989719 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  3. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02 
    0.01679609 = product of:
  0.08398045 = sum of:
    0.08398045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08398045 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  4. Raan, A.F.J. van: Statistical properties of bibliometric indicators : research group indicator distributions and correlations (2006) 0.01 
    0.01187663 = product of:
  0.059383146 = sum of:
    0.059383146 = weight(_text_:22 in 5275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059383146 = score(doc=5275,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 5275, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5275)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:20:22
  5. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.01187663 = product of:
  0.059383146 = sum of:
    0.059383146 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059383146 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  6. Heinz, M.: Bemerkungen zur Entwicklung der Internationalität der Forschung : Bibliometrische Untersuchungen am SCI (2006) 0.01 
    0.011658204 = product of:
  0.058291018 = sum of:
    0.058291018 = weight(_text_:cd in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058291018 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In der Arbeit werden verschiedene Kennziffern zur Messung der Internationalität der Forschung untersucht. Die Grundlage bilden die Daten des Science Citation Index (SCI) von 1980 bis 2002 in der CD-ROM Version. Alle betrachteten Kennziffern weisen einen einheitlichen Gesamttrend in diesem Zeitraum auf der die Hypothese der Zunahme der Internationalität in der Forschung bestätigt. Zwei Kennziffern, der mittlere Anteil eines Landes an einem Artikel und die Diversität, gemessen durch die Shannonsche Entropie des Vektors der Anteile der Länder am SCI, zeigen eine charakteristische Verstärkung der Trends ab 1987, was für eine erhöhte Zunahme des Internationalisierungsprozesses der Forschung ab Mitte der 80er Jahre des vergangenen Jahrhunderts spricht. Darüber hinaus werden Zusammenhänge zwischen der ökonomischen Leistung eines Landes, seinem Anteil am SCI und seiner internationalen Forschungskooperation aufgezeigt.
  7. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.01 
    0.011197394 = product of:
  0.055986967 = sum of:
    0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055986967 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  8. Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007) 0.01 
    0.011197394 = product of:
  0.055986967 = sum of:
    0.055986967 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055986967 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30.12.2007 11:22:39
  9. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.01 
    0.00989719 = product of:
  0.04948595 = sum of:
    0.04948595 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04948595 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  10. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01 
    0.009797719 = product of:
  0.048988596 = sum of:
    0.048988596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048988596 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  11. Larivière, V.; Archambault, V.; Gingras, Y.; Vignola-Gagné, E.: ¬The place of serials in referencing practices : comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities (2006) 0.01 
    0.009715169 = product of:
  0.048575845 = sum of:
    0.048575845 = weight(_text_:cd in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048575845 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21311972 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.2279275 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Journal articles constitute the core documents for the diffusion of knowledge in the natural sciences. It has been argued that the same is not true for the social sciences and humanities where knowledge is more often disseminated in monographs that are not indexed in the journal-based databases used for bibliometric analysis. Previous studies have made only partial assessments of the role played by both serials and other types of literature. The importance of journal literature in the various scientific fields has therefore not been systematically characterized. The authors address this issue by providing a systematic measurement of the role played by journal literature in the building of knowledge in both the natural sciences and engineering and the social sciences and humanities. Using citation data from the CD-ROM versions of the Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), and Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) databases from 1981 to 2000 (Thomson ISI, Philadelphia, PA), the authors quantify the share of citations to both serials and other types of literature. Variations in time and between fields are also analyzed. The results show that journal literature is increasingly important in the natural and social sciences, but that its role in the humanities is stagnant and has even tended to diminish slightly in the 1990s. Journal literature accounts for less than 50% of the citations in several disciplines of the social sciences and humanities; hence, special care should be used when using bibliometric indicators that rely only on journal literature.
  12. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  13. Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:26:24
  14. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  16. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  17. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  18. Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    23. 2.2009 18:22:28
  19. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  20. Camacho-Miñano, M.-del-Mar; Núñez-Nickel, M.: ¬The multilayered nature of reference selection (2009) 0.01 
    0.008398045 = product of:
  0.041990224 = sum of:
    0.041990224 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041990224 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18088265 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051653754 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:05:07

Authors

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 6

Types

  • a 34
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes