-
Zhang, Y.: Scholarly use of Internet-based electronic resources (2001)
0.01
0.013040888 = product of:
0.06520444 = sum of:
0.06520444 = weight(_text_:index in 5212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06520444 = score(doc=5212,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.28967714 = fieldWeight in 5212, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5212)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- By Internet resources Zhang means any electronic file accessible by any Internet protocol. Their usage is determined by an examination of the citations to such sources in a nine-year sample of four print and four electronic LIS journals, by a survey of editors of these journals, and by a survey of scholars with "in press" papers in these journals. Citations were gathered from Social Science Citation Index and manually classed as e-sources by the format used. All authors with "in press" papers were asked about their use and opinion of Internet sources and for any suggestions for improvement. Use of electronic sources is heavy and access is very high. Access and ability explain most usage while satisfaction was not significant. Citation of e-journals increases over the eight years. Authors report under citation of e-journals in favor of print equivalents. Traditional reasons are given for citing and not citing, but additional reasons are also present for e-journals.
-
Xu, H.; Bu, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, C.; Sun, M.; Zhang, Y.; Meyer, E.; Salas, E.; Ding, Y.: Team power dynamics and team impact : new perspectives on scientific collaboration using career age as a proxy for team power (2022)
0.01
0.010867408 = product of:
0.054337036 = sum of:
0.054337036 = weight(_text_:index in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054337036 = score(doc=663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Power dynamics influence every aspect of scientific collaboration. Team power dynamics can be measured by team power level and team power hierarchy. Team power level is conceptualized as the average level of the possession of resources, expertise, or decision-making authorities of a team. Team power hierarchy represents the vertical differences of the possessions of resources in a team. In Science of Science, few studies have looked at scientific collaboration from the perspective of team power dynamics. This research examines how team power dynamics affect team impact to fill the research gap. In this research, all coauthors of one publication are treated as one team. Team power level and team power hierarchy of one team are measured by the mean and Gini index of career age of coauthors in this team. Team impact is quantified by citations of a paper authored by this team. By analyzing over 7.7 million teams from Science (e.g., Computer Science, Physics), Social Sciences (e.g., Sociology, Library & Information Science), and Arts & Humanities (e.g., Art), we find that flat team structure is associated with higher team impact, especially when teams have high team power level. These findings have been repeated in all five disciplines except Art, and are consistent in various types of teams from Computer Science including teams from industry or academia, teams with different gender groups, teams with geographical contrast, and teams with distinct size.
-
Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998)
0.01
0.009869952 = product of:
0.04934976 = sum of:
0.04934976 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04934976 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 17:22:22
-
Zhang, Y.: Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluation (2010)
0.01
0.008374932 = product of:
0.04187466 = sum of:
0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04187466 = score(doc=2360,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2360, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2360)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This article reports the author's recent research in developing a holistic model for various levels of digital library (DL) evaluation in which perceived important criteria from heterogeneous stakeholder groups are organized and presented. To develop such a model, the author applied a three-stage research approach: exploration, confirmation, and verification. During the exploration stage, a literature review was conducted followed by an interview, along with a card sorting technique, to collect important criteria perceived by DL experts. Then the criteria identified were used for developing an online survey during the confirmation stage. Survey respondents (431 in total) from 22 countries rated the importance of the criteria. A holistic DL evaluation model was constructed using statistical techniques. Eventually, the verification stage was devised to test the reliability of the model in the context of searching and evaluating an operational DL. The proposed model fills two lacunae in the DL domain: (a) the lack of a comprehensive and flexible framework to guide and benchmark evaluations, and (b) the uncertainty about what divergence exists among heterogeneous DL stakeholders, including general users.
-
Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009)
0.01
0.008374932 = product of:
0.04187466 = sum of:
0.04187466 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04187466 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:49:11
-
Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Song, S.: ¬The design and evaluation of a nudge-based interface to facilitate consumers' evaluation of online health information credibility (2023)
0.01
0.00697911 = product of:
0.03489555 = sum of:
0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489555 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:18:34
-
Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023)
0.01
0.00697911 = product of:
0.03489555 = sum of:
0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489555 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:07:12
