Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.02 
    0.02073736 = product of:
  0.051843397 = sum of:
    0.027168518 = weight(_text_:index in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027168518 = score(doc=2392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.12069881 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
    0.02467488 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02467488 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    Footnote
    The book also includes an index, a selected bibliography, and endnotes for each article. More information on the authors of the articles would have been useful, however. One of the best features of Information Ethics is the discussion cases at the end of each chapter. For instance, in the discussion cases, Moore asks questions like: Would you allow one person to die to save nine? Should a scientist be allowed to experiment on people without their knowledge if there is no harm? Should marriages between people carrying a certain gene be outlawed? These discussion cases really add to the value of the readings. The only suggestion would be to have put them at the beginning of each section so the reader could have the questions floating in their heads as they read the material. Information Ethics is a well thought out and organized collection of articles. Moore has done an excellent job of finding articles to provide a fair and balanced look at a variety of complicated and far-reaching topics. Further, the work has breadth and depth. Moore is careful to include enough historical articles, like the 1890 Warren article, to give balance and perspective to new and modern topics like E-mail surveillance, biopiracy, and genetics. This provides a reader with just enough philosophy and history theory to work with the material. The articles are written by a variety of authors from differing fields so they range in length, tone, and style, creating a rich tapestry of ideas and arguments. However, this is not a quick or easy read. The subject matter is complex and one should plan to spend time with the book. The book is well worth the effort though. Overall, this is a highly recommended work for all libraries especially academic ones."
  2. Van der Walt, M.S.: Ethics in indexing and clssification (2006) 0.01 
    0.012295068 = product of:
  0.06147534 = sum of:
    0.06147534 = weight(_text_:index in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06147534 = score(doc=5876,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.27311024 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    To start off I would like to briefly address the relationship between indexing and classification, which are very technical activities performed by information professionals, and the concept of social responsibility (the focus of this conference), which refer to the human side of the profession. Although indexing and classification involve many technicalities, the basic objective of these activities is to provide access to informationbearing objects, thereby contributing to the social process of information transfer. Information transfer takes place between authors (creators of information- bearing objects) and information users. The authors have something to communicate, and the users have information needs that must be satisfied by the information professional acting as intermediary. In the process of facilitating this information transfer the indexer and classifier therefore has a responsibility towards both authors and information users. Authors can expect the information professional to represent their creations as accurately and exhaustively as possible in retrieval systems, within the constraints of time and cost. Users can expect the information professional to index and classify in such a way as to ensure that information that can satisfy their information needs will be retrievable within the shortest time and with the least effort possible. One can also see the social responsibility of indexers and classifiers in a broader context. They do not only have a responsibility towards specific authors and users, but also towards communities as a whole, e.g. the scientific community, the business community, or society at large. In the case of the scientific community effective transfer of information about advances in research can be seen as essential for the progress of science. Providing effective and suitable information retrieval systems to make this transfer possible can therefore be seen as a responsibility of information professionals. In a business enterprise the effective organization of business records and other business information sources can make a significant contribution to the smooth operation of the enterprise, may be essential for legal purposes, and can enable management to use the information for decision-making at all levels. The information manager therefore has a responsibility towards the enterprise to properly organize and index all these resources.
  3. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.01 
    0.011166576 = product of:
  0.05583288 = sum of:
    0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05583288 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  4. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01 
    0.011166576 = product of:
  0.05583288 = sum of:
    0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05583288 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  5. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.01 
    0.011166576 = product of:
  0.05583288 = sum of:
    0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05583288 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  6. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.01 
    0.011166576 = product of:
  0.05583288 = sum of:
    0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05583288 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  7. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.01 
    0.011166576 = product of:
  0.05583288 = sum of:
    0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05583288 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  8. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.01 
    0.009770754 = product of:
  0.04885377 = sum of:
    0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04885377 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  9. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.01 
    0.009770754 = product of:
  0.04885377 = sum of:
    0.04885377 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04885377 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  10. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.01 
    0.00697911 = product of:
  0.03489555 = sum of:
    0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489555 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  11. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01 
    0.00697911 = product of:
  0.03489555 = sum of:
    0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03489555 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  12. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00 
    0.004885377 = product of:
  0.024426885 = sum of:
    0.024426885 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024426885 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
  13. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00 
    0.004187466 = product of:
  0.02093733 = sum of:
    0.02093733 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02093733 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications