Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Beatty, S.: Table of contents or index data for subject enrichment : sources and developments (1993) 0.02
    0.024590136 = product of:
      0.12295068 = sum of:
        0.12295068 = weight(_text_:index in 3939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12295068 = score(doc=3939,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 3939, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3939)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the present manual procedures at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library for subject enrichment with reference to the evaluation with reference to the evaluation study carried out in 1991. Investigates potential sources of contents and index data in machine readable form. Reports of the Monographic Table of Contents Project at OCLC and on the latest developments in USMARC format for contents page data
  2. Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992) 0.02
    0.022587484 = product of:
      0.11293741 = sum of:
        0.11293741 = weight(_text_:index in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11293741 = score(doc=2230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.50173557 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
  3. Makinen, R.H.; Friesen B.: Enhancing online bibliographic records to improve retrieval of reference collection monographs (1995) 0.02
    0.021734815 = product of:
      0.10867407 = sum of:
        0.10867407 = weight(_text_:index in 1700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10867407 = score(doc=1700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 1700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1700)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a project to enhance the records of the reference book collection, held on the online catalogue of the Minnesota University, Bio-Medical Library, with tables of contents or summaries; and to keyword index the enhancement fields to improve searching
  4. Beatty, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms : the Australian Defence Force Academy experience (1992) 0.02
    0.02151637 = product of:
      0.10758185 = sum of:
        0.10758185 = weight(_text_:index in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10758185 = score(doc=4649,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In 1986, all titles added to the collection at the Australian Defence Force Academy Library, are processed through their OPAC via a subject enhancement procedure (ESP). The procedure used for subject enhancement is based on the techniques developed by P.A. Atherton and B. Settel during the Subject Access Project at Syracuse Univ., 1977. Terms are selected from contents pages or the index of the book, depending on whether the terms are content bearing, and whether the terms refer to 5 or more pages of text. This results in the addition of an average of 73 words or 20 phrases to each MARC record. The terms are keyed into the MARC field 653 using in house modifications of the library's URICA system
  5. Advances in online public access catalogs : Vol.1 (1992) 0.01
    0.010867408 = product of:
      0.054337036 = sum of:
        0.054337036 = weight(_text_:index in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054337036 = score(doc=4653,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.24139762 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: USER INTERFACES: HULSER, R.P.: Overview of graphical user interfaces; TROUTMA, L.: The online public access catalog and music materials: issues for system and interface design; MISCHO, W.H. u. T.W. COLE: The Illinois extended OPAC: library information workstation design and development; BALLARD, T. u. J. SMITH: The human interface: an ongoing study of OPAC usage at Adelphi University; Pt.2: ENHANCING THE TRADITIONAL CATALOG RECORD: WITTENBACH; S.A.: Building a better mousetrap: enhanced cataloging and access for the online catalog; BEATTY, S.: Subject enrichment using contents or index terms: the Australian Defence Force Academy experience; Enhancing USMARC records with table of contents (MARBI discussion paper; no.46); Pt.3: REDEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE OPAC AND MOVING BEYOND THE LIBRARY WALLS: TROLL, D.A.: The Mercury Project: meeting the expectations of electronc library patrons; JAMIESON, R.C.: Oriental language materials in online public access catalogues; JUZNIC, P. u. H. PAAR: Cooperative cataloguing in Yugoslavia and the development of the OPAC; PERRY, A.: The PACLink Project at the State University of New York: leveraging collections for the future
  6. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.01
    0.005583288 = product of:
      0.02791644 = sum of:
        0.02791644 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02791644 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25