-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.11
0.11421771 = product of:
0.28554428 = sum of:
0.1738785 = weight(_text_:index in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1738785 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.11166576 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11166576 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.10
0.101135254 = product of:
0.25283813 = sum of:
0.1738785 = weight(_text_:index in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1738785 = score(doc=6940,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.078959614 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078959614 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.10
0.100094 = product of:
0.250235 = sum of:
0.1944021 = weight(_text_:index in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1944021 = score(doc=4642,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.86365044 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05583288 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.10
0.0999405 = product of:
0.24985124 = sum of:
0.1521437 = weight(_text_:index in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1521437 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.09770754 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09770754 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.10
0.0999405 = product of:
0.24985124 = sum of:
0.1521437 = weight(_text_:index in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1521437 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.09770754 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09770754 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.10
0.0999405 = product of:
0.24985124 = sum of:
0.1521437 = weight(_text_:index in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1521437 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.09770754 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09770754 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.10
0.0999405 = product of:
0.24985124 = sum of:
0.1521437 = weight(_text_:index in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1521437 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.09770754 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09770754 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007)
0.08
0.08256644 = product of:
0.2064161 = sum of:
0.15058322 = weight(_text_:index in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15058322 = score(doc=737,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.6689808 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05583288 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Recycling eines Buchregisters Eine Index-Revision liegt dann vor, wenn das Register zu einer vorhergehenden Auflage eines Buches für die Neuauflage überarbeitet wird. Es gibt Vor- und Nachteile beim Versuch, einen Index zu überarbeiten - sowie verschiedene Erfolgsmaßstäbe. Eine detaillierte Fallstudie wir vorgestellt und die benutzte Software-Methode beschrieben.
- Date
- 8.12.2007 18:41:22
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.07
0.07146314 = product of:
0.17865784 = sum of:
0.14376229 = weight(_text_:index in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14376229 = score(doc=5775,freq=14.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.63867813 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.03489555 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03489555 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.06
0.057108857 = product of:
0.14277214 = sum of:
0.08693925 = weight(_text_:index in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08693925 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.3862362 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.05583288 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05583288 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Dienelt, O.: ¬Ein Workshop über Indexing (2003)
0.05
0.052803494 = product of:
0.13200873 = sum of:
0.10758185 = weight(_text_:index in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10758185 = score(doc=1502,freq=16.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.4779429 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.024426885 = weight(_text_:22 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024426885 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18038483 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- "Unter der Leitung von Frank Merrett von der Socieryy of Indexers (www.indexers.org.uk), die in Sheffield ihren Hauptsitz hat, fand am 22. Januar in London ein Workshop statt, in dem Einblicke in das Indexing (Registererstellung) ermöglicht wurden. SechsTeilnehmerinnen und drei Teilnehmer (Bibliothekare, Katalogisierer, angehende Indexer, Benutzer von Indices) bekamen durch Merrett neben den grundlegenden Dingen auch ein wenig Einblick in die Berufswirklichkeit eines Indexers vermittelt. Zunächst wurden einige Definitionen dessen, was ein Index ist, angesprochen: Ein Index (Register) ist eine systematische Anordnung von Eintragungen, die es dem Benutzer ermöglichen, Informationen in einem Dokument zu finden (nach Norm BS ISO 999,1996). Auch andere Definitionen besagen, dass die im Hauptteil eines Dokuments enthaltenen Informationen so herausgefiltert werden sollen, dass durch die Benutzung des Registers ein möglichst benutzerfreundlicher Zugang zum Hauptteil erfolgen kann. Ein Index soll den einen Benutzer entscheiden lassen, ob ein Dokument etwas für ihn Interessantes enthält. Dem anderen soll es dazu dienen, das Gelesene wieder aufzufrischen. Ein Index muss beiden gerecht werden. Nach Eintreffen des Materials vom Verlag (sehr oft als Papierausdruck) beginnt der erste Schritt, der vom persönlichen Arbeitsstil des Indexers abhängt. Manche beginnen sofort beim Lesen mit dem Niederschreiben von Begriffen, oft unter Verwendung von Software (Macrex, Cindex), andere markieren oder unterstreichen zunächst die relevanten Begriffe. Hier beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit, die darin besteht, wichtige Informationen aus dem Text herauszufiltern und so aufzubereiten, dass ein Buchleser zu Wichtigem hingeführt wird. Dazu gehören Entscheidungen wie zum Beispiel »was ist wichtig«, »was kann/ muss weggelassen werden«, »wo müssen Siehe- beziehungsweise Siehe-auch-Verweise eingebrachtwerden«. Bibliothekarisch gesehen, ist dies Sacherschließung und zugleich formale Erfassung, letztlich das Aufbauen eines Kreuzkatalogs. So wie ein Sacherschließer muss auch ein Indexer ständig überlegen, mit welchen Begriffen er dem Benutzer des Registers einen guten Zugang zur Information verschaffen kann. Ein gutes Verständnis des Faches, das in der Vorlage behandelt wird, ist deshalb unbedingt notwendig. Das wurde anhand einiger Seiten geübt, genauso wie das Aufbe-reiten des Index. Äußerste Genauigkeit ist hier nötig. Anhand eines fertigen Index mit eingebauten Ungenauigkeiten wurde geübt, sehr genau hinzuschauen und kleinste Ungenauigkeiten zu erkennen. Merrett sagte, dass ein gut geschriebenes Buch besser zu bearbeiten sei als eines, das einen weniger guten Hauptteil hat. Oft hat ein Indexer nur zwei Wochen Zeit für die Erstellung eines Registers. Die wenigsten dürften allerdings ständig von morgens bis abends an einem Index arbeiten, und nur sehr wenige verdienen ausschließlich mit dem Erstellen von Registern ihren Lebensunterhalt. Meistens ist dies ein Nebenjob. Nach Frank Merrett sind die Verhandlungen mit einem Verlag über einen zu erstellenden Index recht vorsichtig zu führen. Insbesondere über die Termine (Eintreffen des Manuskripts, Abliefern des Produkts) sowie die Form der Vorlage (welches Format, welcher Umfang) muss sich ein Indexer absichern, um keine Überraschungen zu erleben. So kann es sein, dass die Vorlage nicht als Buch, sondern als ein Stapel von Druckbogen, ungefalzt und unsortiert, ankommt. Auch das Honorar muß vom Indexer in Anbetracht des zu erwartenden Aufwandes verhandelt werden. Indexer ist keine geschützte Bezeichnung, deshalb kann sich jeder so nennen. Die Prüfungen, die man bei der Sociery of Indexers ablegen kann, sind aber ein Qualitätsnachweis. Die Society kann durch das Aufführen der Namen und Spezialgebiete auf der Homepage beziehungsweise in einem Verzeichnis einiges für die Mitglieder tun. Die Sociery legt auf das Kontakthalten mit Verlegern großen Wert, um dort auf die Dienste der Indexer hinzuweisen. Um Aufträge muß sich aber jeder selbst kümmern.
-
Wheatley, H.B.: What is an index : a few notes on indexes and indexers (1879)
0.05
0.052704133 = product of:
0.26352066 = sum of:
0.26352066 = weight(_text_:index in 3801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26352066 = score(doc=3801,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
1.1707164 = fieldWeight in 3801, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3801)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- London : Index Society
- Series
- Index Society: publications; 1
-
Garfield, E.: ¬The Permuterm Subject Index : an autobiographic review (1976)
0.05
0.049180273 = product of:
0.24590136 = sum of:
0.24590136 = weight(_text_:index in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24590136 = score(doc=3299,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
1.092441 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Object
- Permuterm Subject Index
-
Schimmel, A.: Morgenland und Abendland (2002)
0.05
0.045174967 = product of:
0.22587483 = sum of:
0.22587483 = weight(_text_:index in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22587483 = score(doc=4431,freq=24.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
1.0034711 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Darin (S.311): "Der Eidex ist ein liebes Tier, Der Index frißt sehr viel Papier. Der Eidex lebt vergnügt im Süden, Der Index tut mich sehr ermüden. Der Eidex liegt auf warmen Steinen, Der Index bringt mich fast zum Weinen. Der Eidex frißt gemütlich Mücken, Der Index krümmt mir meinen Rücken. Der Eidex sonnt sich still am Bach, Der Index läßt mich stöhnen - ach ... Der Eidex tanzt den Sonnentanz, Der Index hat 'nen langen Schwanz. Der Eidex hebt im Tanz die Pfoten, Der Index kämpft mit Fußfußnoten. Der Eidex legt jetzt rasch ein Ei, Der Index tut's in die Kartei. Der Eidex fängt nun an zu betteln, Der Index gräbt in seinen Zetteln. Der Eidex sagt: «Du bist so fleißig», Der Index sagt: «Oh ... Seite dreißig ...» Der Eidex hofft auf süßen Schlummer, Der Index doch wälzt sich vor Kummer. Der Eidex wird ins Bett gebracht, Der Index, ach, starrt in die Nacht: Die Frage steht vor ihm wie Rauch: Stimmt Seite 170 auch?"
-
Rasheed, M.A.: Comparative index terms (1989)
0.04
0.04346963 = product of:
0.21734814 = sum of:
0.21734814 = weight(_text_:index in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21734814 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.9655905 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Newbrough, C.: ¬The user-friendly index (1992)
0.04
0.04346963 = product of:
0.21734814 = sum of:
0.21734814 = weight(_text_:index in 6351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21734814 = score(doc=6351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.9655905 = fieldWeight in 6351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6351)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Ramesh Babu, B.: Some thoughts on requirements for a good index to a book (1991)
0.04
0.03764581 = product of:
0.18822904 = sum of:
0.18822904 = weight(_text_:index in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18822904 = score(doc=998,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.836226 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Discusses the characteristics of a good book index such as exhaustiveness, internal and external guidance, indexing scheme, depth of index, alphabetization, locators, physical appearance and layout. Highlights current indexing practices and enumerates the qualities and ethical responsibilities of indexers
-
Fetters, L.: ¬A book-style index for the web : the University of Texas policies and procedures website (1998)
0.04
0.03764581 = product of:
0.18822904 = sum of:
0.18822904 = weight(_text_:index in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18822904 = score(doc=3766,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.836226 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the process of creating a web index for an online index of printed documents. Includes practical examples of HTML linking, and the use of named software
-
Wallis, E.; Lavall, C.: Naming the indexer : where credit is due (1995)
0.04
0.036885202 = product of:
0.18442601 = sum of:
0.18442601 = weight(_text_:index in 2961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18442601 = score(doc=2961,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.8193307 = fieldWeight in 2961, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2961)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Traces attittudes over the years to naming the authors of an index, and identifies the arguments for and against placing the name with the printed index
-
ISO 999: Index of a publication (1975)
0.03
0.0347757 = product of:
0.1738785 = sum of:
0.1738785 = weight(_text_:index in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1738785 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.051511593 = queryNorm
0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
