Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

Prathap, G.: ¬The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index (2014) 0.04

0.042591367 = product of:
  0.21295683 = sum of:
    0.21295683 = weight(_text_:index in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21295683 = score(doc=1207,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.94608164 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract: The h-index, as originally proposed (Hirsch, 2005), is a purely heuristic construction. Burrell (2013) showed that efforts to derive formulae from the mathematical framework of Lotkaian informetrics could lead to misleading results. On this note, we argue that a simple heuristic "thermodynamical" model can enable a better three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the information production process leading to what we call the zynergy-index.
Object: h-index
zynergy-index.

Prathap, G.: ¬The inconsistency of the H-index (2012) 0.04

0.036885202 = product of:
  0.18442601 = sum of:
    0.18442601 = weight(_text_:index in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18442601 = score(doc=287,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.8193307 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object: h-index

Prathap, G.: ¬A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel-Schubert model for the h-index (2011) 0.03

0.0347757 = product of:
  0.1738785 = sum of:
    0.1738785 = weight(_text_:index in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1738785 = score(doc=4453,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.7724724 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract: Recently, it was shown that among existing theoretical models for the h-index, the Glänzel-Schubert model provides the best fit for a chosen example involving the research evaluation of universities. In this brief communication, we propose a thermodynamic explanation for the success of the Glänzel-Schubert model of the h-index.
Object: h-index

Prathap, G.: ¬The thermodynamics-bibliometrics consilience and the meaning of h-type indices (2012) 0.03

0.026081776 = product of:
  0.13040888 = sum of:
    0.13040888 = weight(_text_:index in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13040888 = score(doc=4990,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object: h-index

Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014) 0.02

0.024590136 = product of:
  0.12295068 = sum of:
    0.12295068 = weight(_text_:index in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12295068 = score(doc=1250,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object: h-index
g-index

Prathap, G.: ¬A three-class, three-dimensional bibliometric performance indicator (2014) 0.02

0.021734815 = product of:
  0.10867407 = sum of:
    0.10867407 = weight(_text_:index in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10867407 = score(doc=1308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051511593 = queryNorm
        0.48279524 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract: In this brief communication, we show how a simple 3D bibliometric performance evaluation based on the zynergy-index (Prathap, 2013) can be simplified by the recently introduced 3-class approach (Ye & Leydesdorff, in press).