Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
    Object
    Web of Science
  2. Meho, L.I.; Yang, K.: Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty : Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
    Object
    Web of Science
  3. Sanderson, M.: Revisiting h measured on UK LIS and IR academics (2008) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 1867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 1867, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1867)
    Object
    Web of Science
  4. Meho, L.I.; Rogers, Y.: Citation counting, citation ranking, and h-index of human-computer interaction researchers : a comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 2352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 2352, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2352)
    Object
    Web of Science
  5. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? : a macrolevel study (2008) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 2375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 2375, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2375)
    Object
    Web of Science
  6. Archambault, E.; Campbell, D; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
    Object
    Web of Science
  7. Meho, L.I.; Sugimoto, C.R.: Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies : a tale of two citation databases - Scopus and Web of Science (2009) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
    Object
    Web of Science
  8. Harzing, A.-W.: Comparing the Google Scholar h-index with the ISI Journal Impact Factor (2008) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    Object
    Web of Science
  9. Jacso, P.: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster (2008) 7.87 
    7.8682456 = weight(object_ss:Web of Science in 5586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  7.8682456 = fieldWeight in 5586, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    7.8682456 = idf(docFreq=45, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=5586)
    Object
    Web of Science

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes