Search (4689 results, page 1 of 235)

0.21882796 = product of:
  0.5470699 = sum of:
    0.492055 = weight(_text_:2200 in 1711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.492055 = score(doc=1711,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.595989 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.8256109 = fieldWeight in 1711, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1711)
    0.05501491 = weight(_text_:22 in 1711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05501491 = score(doc=1711,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1711, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1711)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Classification

NC 2200 (BVB)

Date

21. 3.2008 12:22:03

RVK

NC 2200 (BVB)

0.17994046 = product of:
  0.44985116 = sum of:
    0.32246184 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32246184 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5737571 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.1273893 = weight(_text_:link in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1273893 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.35324624 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.17606492 = product of:
  0.4401623 = sum of:
    0.21951754 = weight(_text_:objects in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21951754 = score(doc=764,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
    0.22064476 = weight(_text_:link in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22064476 = score(doc=764,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.6118405 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Although the object-oriente paradigm is well suited for modelling self-contained independent objects, it is not suited for modelling persistent relations (static links) between abstract data objects. At the same time, the concept of computer-navigable links is an integral part of hypermedia paradigm. In contrast to multimedia, where the object-oriented paradigm plays a leading role, the 'static link' deficiency considerably reduces the application of object-oriented methods in hypermedia. Presents a new logical data model (the HM Data Model) which incorporates the well-known principles of object-oriented data modelling into the management of large-scale, multi-user hypermedia databases. The model is based on the notion of abstract hypermedia data objects called S-collections. Computer-navigable links approach not only overcomes the static link deficiency of the object-oriented paradigm, but also supports modularity, incremental development, and flexible versioning, and provides a solid logical basis for sematic modelling

0.15099071 = product of:
  0.37747675 = sum of:
    0.32246184 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32246184 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5737571 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.05501491 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05501491 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.14973345 = product of:
  0.37433362 = sum of:
    0.105615415 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105615415 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.2687182 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2687182 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5737571 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.14701848 = product of:
  0.3675462 = sum of:
    0.294193 = weight(_text_:link in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.294193 = score(doc=2830,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.8157873 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
    0.073353216 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073353216 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The PRO-CITE and BIBLIO-LINK software packages make the process of compiling bibliographies and internal data bases much easier than when all the steps in the process were manual (compiling, typing). The 2 programs work on records that have been downloaded from on-line data bases. BIBLIO-LINK analyses the downloaded records to determine document type and stores the data in the appropriate PRO-CITE workform, putting fields from the downloaded record into the correct PRO-CITE fields.

Object

BIBLIO-LINK

Source

Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24

0.14396289 = product of:
  0.3599072 = sum of:
    0.29572314 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29572314 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.06418406 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06418406 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.

Date

21.11.2019 18:46:22

0.13895331 = product of:
  0.34738326 = sum of:
    0.12673849 = weight(_text_:objects in 1084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12673849 = score(doc=1084,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 1084, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1084)
    0.22064476 = weight(_text_:link in 1084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22064476 = score(doc=1084,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.6118405 = fieldWeight in 1084, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1084)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

An important stage in the process of retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objetcs; an operation that is usually undertaken manually such as the allocation of subject index terms to documents. Reports results of a study in which several different sets of hypertext links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full text documents. The similarity between the members of each pair of link sets was then evaluated. Results indicated that little similarity existed among the link sets, a finding comparable with those of studies of inter indexer consistency, which suggests that there is generally only a low level of agreemenet between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by indexers. Concludes with that part of the study designed to test the validity of making these kinds of assumptions in the context of hypertext link sets

0.13553482 = product of:
  0.33883706 = sum of:
    0.16898467 = weight(_text_:objects in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16898467 = score(doc=5,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
    0.16985239 = weight(_text_:link in 5) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16985239 = score(doc=5,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.47099498 = fieldWeight in 5, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Discusses some aspects of the management of image collections in electronic form. Looks at developments in the UK higher education sector and acquisitions of large picture collections by commercial interests. Considers the indexing and retrieval problems posed by images, particularly in the art field, where a picture may contain hundreds of objects that could conceivably be referenced, and possible solutions being examined, such as the computer matching of shapes

Source

IT link. 10(1997) no.3, S.3-5

0.12898473 = product of:
  0.6449237 = sum of:
    0.6449237 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6449237 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5737571 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.12582558 = product of:
  0.31456396 = sum of:
    0.2687182 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2687182 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5737571 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.04584576 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04584576 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.12493346 = product of:
  0.31233364 = sum of:
    0.23898041 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23898041 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.073353216 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073353216 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68

0.12493346 = product of:
  0.31233364 = sum of:
    0.23898041 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23898041 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.073353216 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073353216 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.123657085 = product of:
  0.20609513 = sum of:
    0.08449233 = weight(_text_:objects in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08449233 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
    0.084926195 = weight(_text_:link in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084926195 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.23549749 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
    0.036676608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036676608 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

Despite the existence of a logical structural model for bibliographic records which integrates any record type, library catalogues persist in offering catalogue records at the level of 'items'. Such records however, do not clearly indicate which works they contain. Hence the search possibilities of the end user are unduly limited. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) present through a conceptual model, independent of any cataloguing code or implementation, a globalized view of the bibliographic universe. This model, a synthesis of the existing cataloguing rules, consists of clearly structured entities and well defined types of relationships among them. From a theoretical viewpoint, the model is likely to be a good knowledge organiser with great potential in identifying the author and the work represented by an item or publication and is able to link different works of the author with different editions, translations or adaptations of those works aiming at better answering the user needs. This paper is presenting an interpretation of the FRBR model opposing it to a traditional bibliographic record of a complex library material.

Content

1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity

Date

17. 6.2015 14:40:22

0.12264984 = product of:
  0.3066246 = sum of:
    0.17923531 = weight(_text_:objects in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17923531 = score(doc=708,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
    0.1273893 = weight(_text_:link in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1273893 = score(doc=708,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.35324624 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

This Standard presents guidelines and conventions for the contents, display, construction, testing, maintenance, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. This Standard focuses on controlled vocabularies that are used for the representation of content objects in knowledge organization systems including lists, synonym rings, taxonomies, and thesauri. This Standard should be regarded as a set of recommendations based on preferred techniques and procedures. Optional procedures are, however, sometimes described, e.g., for the display of terms in a controlled vocabulary. The primary purpose of vocabulary control is to achieve consistency in the description of content objects and to facilitate retrieval. Vocabulary control is accomplished by three principal methods: defining the scope, or meaning, of terms; using the equivalence relationship to link synonymous and nearly synonymous terms; and distinguishing among homographs.

0.12160281 = product of:
  0.30400702 = sum of:
    0.2123155 = weight(_text_:link in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2123155 = score(doc=2805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.58874375 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
    0.09169152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09169152 = score(doc=2805,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2805, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2805)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source

Link-up. 12(1995) no.3, S.20-22

0.12160281 = product of:
  0.30400702 = sum of:
    0.2123155 = weight(_text_:link in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2123155 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.58874375 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
    0.09169152 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09169152 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".

0.121168934 = product of:
  0.30292234 = sum of:
    0.21123083 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21123083 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.09169152 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09169152 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23698951 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.11859297 = product of:
  0.2964824 = sum of:
    0.14786157 = weight(_text_:objects in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14786157 = score(doc=3530,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3597023 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
    0.14862084 = weight(_text_:link in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14862084 = score(doc=3530,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36062464 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.4121206 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3287 = idf(docFreq=582, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

ISO standards for document description have been recently developed. These standards view documents as hierarchical objects and it is likely that languages such as SGML (Standard Generalised Markup Language) will become widely used in the future for document markup. As structured documents become available, so there will be a need to evolve tools to take advantage of structural knowledge. A conceptual model for bibliographic data has been designed, known as Maestro (Management Environment for Structured Text Retrieval and Organization). It supports structured documents and provides a query language to retrieve and link information contained in these structures. The Maestro system is being built on top of an existing full text retrieval system known as FullText

0.11481283 = product of:
  0.57406414 = sum of:
    0.57406414 = weight(_text_:2200 in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.57406414 = score(doc=2199,freq=1.0), product of:
        0.595989 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06767591 = queryNorm
        0.96321267 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
          1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
            1.0 = termFreq=1.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

2200