Search (6114 results, page 1 of 306)

  1. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.12
    0.11728694 = product of:
      0.17593041 = sum of:
        0.049236603 = product of:
          0.1477098 = sum of:
            0.1477098 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1477098 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12669381 = sum of:
          0.08135542 = weight(_text_:digital in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08135542 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.493069 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.0453384 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0453384 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  2. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.12
    0.116178 = product of:
      0.174267 = sum of:
        0.026111651 = product of:
          0.07833495 = sum of:
            0.07833495 = weight(_text_:objects in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07833495 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14815535 = sum of:
          0.114151545 = weight(_text_:digital in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114151545 = score(doc=3387,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.034003798 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034003798 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
    Source
    Semantic digital libraries. Eds.: S.R. Kruk, B. McDaniel
  3. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.11
    0.11329188 = product of:
      0.16993782 = sum of:
        0.043082025 = product of:
          0.12924607 = sum of:
            0.12924607 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12924607 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12685579 = sum of:
          0.08718469 = weight(_text_:digital in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08718469 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
          0.039671097 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039671097 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  4. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.10
    0.10487959 = product of:
      0.15731938 = sum of:
        0.03046359 = product of:
          0.091390766 = sum of:
            0.091390766 = weight(_text_:objects in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091390766 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12685579 = sum of:
          0.08718469 = weight(_text_:digital in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08718469 = score(doc=597,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
          0.039671097 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039671097 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
  5. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.10
    0.09760394 = product of:
      0.1464059 = sum of:
        0.026111651 = product of:
          0.07833495 = sum of:
            0.07833495 = weight(_text_:objects in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07833495 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12029426 = sum of:
          0.086290464 = weight(_text_:digital in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.086290464 = score(doc=2419,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
          0.034003798 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034003798 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 8th European conference, ECDL 2004, Bath, UK, September 12-17, 2004 : proceedings. Eds.: Heery, R. u. E. Lyon
  6. Marcondes, C.H.: Towards a vocabulary to implement culturally relevant relationships between digital collections in heritage institutions (2020) 0.09
    0.093003854 = product of:
      0.13950577 = sum of:
        0.030772876 = product of:
          0.092318624 = sum of:
            0.092318624 = weight(_text_:objects in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092318624 = score(doc=5757,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.108732894 = sum of:
          0.08039639 = weight(_text_:digital in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08039639 = score(doc=5757,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.4872566 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
          0.028336499 = weight(_text_:22 in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028336499 = score(doc=5757,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Cultural heritage institutions are publishing their digital collections over the web as LOD. This is is a new step in the patrimonialization and curatorial processes developed by such institutions. Many of these collections are thematically superimposed and complementary. Frequently, objects in these collections present culturally relevant relationships, such as a book about a painting, or a draft or sketch of a famous painting, etc. LOD technology enables such heritage records to be interlinked, achieving interoperability and adding value to digital collections, thus empowering heritage institutions. An aim of this research is characterizing such culturally relevant relationships and organizing them in a vocabulary. Use cases or examples of relationships between objects suggested by curators or mentioned in literature and in the conceptual models as FRBR/LRM, CIDOC CRM and RiC-CM, were collected and used as examples or inspiration of cultural relevant relationships. Relationships identified are collated and compared for identifying those with the same or similar meaning, synthesized and normalized. A set of thirty-three culturally relevant relationships are identified and formalized as a LOD property vocabulary to be used by digital curators to interlink digital collections. The results presented are provisional and a starting point to be discussed, tested, and enhanced.
    Date
    4. 3.2020 14:22:41
  7. Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004) 0.09
    0.08796521 = product of:
      0.13194782 = sum of:
        0.03692745 = product of:
          0.11078235 = sum of:
            0.11078235 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11078235 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.09502037 = sum of:
          0.06101657 = weight(_text_:digital in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06101657 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
          0.034003798 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034003798 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
  8. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.09
    0.085440874 = product of:
      0.12816131 = sum of:
        0.03692745 = product of:
          0.11078235 = sum of:
            0.11078235 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11078235 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.091233864 = sum of:
          0.043145232 = weight(_text_:digital in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043145232 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.26148933 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
          0.048088636 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048088636 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  9. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.09
    0.08522656 = product of:
      0.12783983 = sum of:
        0.04865619 = product of:
          0.14596857 = sum of:
            0.14596857 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14596857 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.07918364 = sum of:
          0.05084714 = weight(_text_:digital in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05084714 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.3081681 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
          0.028336499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028336499 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  10. Neunzert, H.: Mathematische Modellierung : ein "curriculum vitae" (2012) 0.08
    0.08285834 = product of:
      0.24857502 = sum of:
        0.24857502 = product of:
          0.74572504 = sum of:
            0.74572504 = weight(_text_:c3 in 2255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.74572504 = score(doc=2255,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.40787706 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                1.8283083 = fieldWeight in 2255, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2255)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag auf der Tagung "Geschichte und Modellierung", Jena, 3. Februar 2012. Vgl. unter: http://www.fmi.uni-jena.de/Fakult%C3%A4t/Institute+und+Abteilungen/Abteilung+f%C3%BCr+Didaktik/Kolloquien.html?highlight=neunzert.
  11. Winget, M.A.: Annotations on musical scores by performing musicians : collaborative models, interactive methods, and music digital library tool development (2008) 0.08
    0.08075468 = product of:
      0.121132016 = sum of:
        0.026111651 = product of:
          0.07833495 = sum of:
            0.07833495 = weight(_text_:objects in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07833495 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.09502037 = sum of:
          0.06101657 = weight(_text_:digital in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06101657 = score(doc=2368,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
          0.034003798 = weight(_text_:22 in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034003798 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although there have been a number of fairly recent studies in which researchers have explored the information-seeking and management behaviors of people interacting with musical retrieval systems, there have been very few published studies of the interaction and use behaviors of musicians interacting with their primary information object, the musical score. The ethnographic research reported here seeks to correct this deficiency in the literature. In addition to observing rehearsals and conducting 22 in-depth musician interviews, this research provides in-depth analysis of 25,000 annotations representing 250 parts from 13 complete musical works, made by musicians of all skill levels and performance modes. In addition to producing specific and practical recommendations for digital-library development, this research also provides an augmented annotation framework that will enable more specific study of human-information interaction, both with musical scores, and with more general notational/instructional information objects.
  12. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.08
    0.08075468 = product of:
      0.121132016 = sum of:
        0.026111651 = product of:
          0.07833495 = sum of:
            0.07833495 = weight(_text_:objects in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07833495 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.09502037 = sum of:
          0.06101657 = weight(_text_:digital in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06101657 = score(doc=2418,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
          0.034003798 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034003798 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Integrated digital access to multiple collections is a prominent issue for many Cultural Heritage institutions. The metadata describing diverse collections must be interoperable, which requires aligning the controlled vocabularies that are used to annotate objects from these collections. In this paper, we present an experiment where we match the vocabularies of two collections by applying the Knowledge Representation techniques established in recent Semantic Web research. We discuss the steps that are required for such matching, namely formalising the initial resources using Semantic Web languages, and running ontology mapping tools on the resulting representations. In addition, we present a prototype that enables the user to browse the two collections using the obtained alignment while still providing her with the original vocabulary structures.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  13. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.08
    0.08075468 = product of:
      0.121132016 = sum of:
        0.026111651 = product of:
          0.07833495 = sum of:
            0.07833495 = weight(_text_:objects in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07833495 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.09502037 = sum of:
          0.06101657 = weight(_text_:digital in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06101657 = score(doc=5583,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.034003798 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034003798 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
  14. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.08
    0.07994192 = product of:
      0.23982576 = sum of:
        0.23982576 = sum of:
          0.12203314 = weight(_text_:digital in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12203314 = score(doc=1339,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.7396035 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
          0.117792614 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.117792614 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
    Source
    Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
  15. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Wissensordnungen im analogen und im digitalen Zeitalter (2017) 0.08
    0.07811959 = product of:
      0.23435877 = sum of:
        0.23435877 = product of:
          0.7030763 = sum of:
            0.7030763 = weight(_text_:c3 in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.7030763 = score(doc=4026,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.40787706 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                1.7237456 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://books.google.de/books?hl=de&lr=&id=0rtGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA35&dq=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung+OR+sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&ots=5u0TwCbFqE&sig=GGw3Coc21CINkone-6Lx8LaSAjY#v=onepage&q=inhaltserschlie%C3%9Fung%20OR%20sacherschlie%C3%9Fung&f=false.
  16. Galloway, P.: Preservation of digital objects (2003) 0.08
    0.077417515 = product of:
      0.11612627 = sum of:
        0.065279126 = product of:
          0.19583736 = sum of:
            0.19583736 = weight(_text_:objects in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19583736 = score(doc=4275,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.8808569 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.05084714 = product of:
          0.10169428 = sum of:
            0.10169428 = weight(_text_:digital in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10169428 = score(doc=4275,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.6163362 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The preservation of digital objects (defined here as objects in digital form that require a computer to support their existence and display) is obviously an important practical issue for the information professions, with its importance growing daily as more information objects are produced in, or converted to, digital form. Yakel's (2001) review of the field provided a much-needed introduction. At the same time, the complexity of new digital objects continues to increase, challenging existing preservation efforts (Lee, Skattery, Lu, Tang, & McCrary, 2002). The field of information science itself is beginning to pay some reflexive attention to the creation of fragile and unpreservable digital objects. But these concerns focus often an the practical problems of short-term repurposing of digital objects rather than actual preservation, by which I mean the activity of carrying digital objects from one software generation to another, undertaken for purposes beyond the original reasons for creating the objects. For preservation in this sense to be possible, information science as a discipline needs to be active in the formulation of, and advocacy for, national information policies. Such policies will need to challenge the predominant cultural expectation of planned obsolescence for information resources, and cultural artifacts in general.
  17. Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005) 0.08
    0.076975465 = product of:
      0.1154632 = sum of:
        0.05838743 = product of:
          0.17516229 = sum of:
            0.17516229 = weight(_text_:objects in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17516229 = score(doc=5727,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.22232598 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.057075772 = product of:
          0.114151545 = sum of:
            0.114151545 = weight(_text_:digital in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114151545 = score(doc=5727,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04182935 = queryNorm
                0.6918357 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
  18. Chen, C.: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries (2002) 0.07
    0.07273681 = product of:
      0.21821041 = sum of:
        0.21821041 = sum of:
          0.12203314 = weight(_text_:digital in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12203314 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.7396035 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
          0.09617727 = weight(_text_:22 in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09617727 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:13:11
    Source
    Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
  19. Shen, R.; Wang, J.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems (2002) 0.07
    0.07273681 = product of:
      0.21821041 = sum of:
        0.21821041 = sum of:
          0.12203314 = weight(_text_:digital in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12203314 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.7396035 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.09617727 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09617727 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:15:14
    Source
    Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
  20. Börner, K.; Chen, C.: Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries : Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges (2002) 0.07
    0.07273681 = product of:
      0.21821041 = sum of:
        0.21821041 = sum of:
          0.12203314 = weight(_text_:digital in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12203314 = score(doc=1359,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16499805 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.7396035 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
          0.09617727 = weight(_text_:22 in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09617727 = score(doc=1359,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14647926 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04182935 = queryNorm
              0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:20:07
    Source
    Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen

Languages

Types

  • a 5105
  • m 601
  • el 431
  • s 265
  • x 46
  • b 42
  • r 34
  • i 28
  • p 9
  • ? 8
  • n 5
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications