Search (8136 results, page 1 of 407)

  1. Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998) 0.22 
    0.21827133 = sum of:
  0.04517859 = product of:
    0.13553576 = sum of:
      0.13553576 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13553576 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.17309274 = sum of:
    0.114259094 = weight(_text_:web in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.114259094 = score(doc=3383,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    0.058833648 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058833648 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
    Abstract
    Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.20 
    0.20071056 = sum of:
  0.16421184 = product of:
    0.49263552 = sum of:
      0.49263552 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.49263552 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5259285 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03649873 = product of:
    0.07299746 = sum of:
      0.07299746 = weight(_text_:web in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07299746 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.19 
    0.19275442 = sum of:
  0.0985271 = product of:
    0.2955813 = sum of:
      0.2955813 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2955813 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5259285 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.094227314 = sum of:
    0.043798473 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043798473 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.05042884 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05042884 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.18 
    0.17944206 = sum of:
  0.06707282 = product of:
    0.20121846 = sum of:
      0.20121846 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20121846 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.11236924 = sum of:
    0.061940394 = weight(_text_:web in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061940394 = score(doc=3968,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.05042884 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05042884 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
    Source
    The World Wide Web and Databases: International Workshop WebDB'98, Valencia, Spain, March 27-28, 1998, Selected papers. Eds.: P. Atzeni et al
  5. Li, X.: Designing an interactive Web tutorial with cross-browser dynamic HTML (2000) 0.18 
    0.1767503 = sum of:
  0.038724504 = product of:
    0.11617351 = sum of:
      0.11617351 = weight(_text_:objects in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11617351 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13802579 = sum of:
    0.087596945 = weight(_text_:web in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087596945 = score(doc=4897,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    0.05042884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05042884 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
    Abstract
    Texas A&M University Libraries developed a Web-based training (WBT) application for LandView III, a federal depository CD-ROM publication using cross-browser dynamic HTML (DHTML) and other Web technologies. The interactive and self-paced tutorial demonstrates the major features of the CD-ROM and shows how to navigate the programs. The tutorial features dynamic HTML techniques, such as hiding, showing and moving layers; dragging objects; and windows-style drop-down menus. It also integrates interactive forms, common gateway interface (CGI), frames, and animated GIF images in the design of the WBT. After describing the design and implementation of the tutorial project, an evaluation of usage statistics and user feedback was conducted, as well as an assessment of its strengths and weaknesses, and a comparison of this tutorial with other common types of training methods. The present article describes an innovative approach for CD-ROM training using advanced Web technologies such as dynamic HTML, which can simulate and demonstrate the interactive use of the CD-ROM, as well as the actual search process of a database.
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:21:22
  6. Gendt, M. van; Isaac, I.; Meij, L. van der; Schlobach, S.: Semantic Web techniques for multiple views on heterogeneous collections : a case study (2006) 0.18 
    0.1767503 = sum of:
  0.038724504 = product of:
    0.11617351 = sum of:
      0.11617351 = weight(_text_:objects in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11617351 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13802579 = sum of:
    0.087596945 = weight(_text_:web in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.087596945 = score(doc=2418,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
    0.05042884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05042884 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
    Abstract
    Integrated digital access to multiple collections is a prominent issue for many Cultural Heritage institutions. The metadata describing diverse collections must be interoperable, which requires aligning the controlled vocabularies that are used to annotate objects from these collections. In this paper, we present an experiment where we match the vocabularies of two collections by applying the Knowledge Representation techniques established in recent Semantic Web research. We discuss the steps that are required for such matching, namely formalising the initial resources using Semantic Web languages, and running ontology mapping tools on the resulting representations. In addition, we present a prototype that enables the user to browse the two collections using the obtained alignment while still providing her with the original vocabulary structures.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Varela, C.A.; Agha, G.A.: What after Java? : From objects to actors (1998) 0.18 
    0.17627604 = sum of:
  0.04517859 = product of:
    0.13553576 = sum of:
      0.13553576 = weight(_text_:objects in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13553576 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.13109745 = sum of:
    0.0722638 = weight(_text_:web in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0722638 = score(doc=3612,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    0.058833648 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058833648 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
    Abstract
    Discusses drawbacks of the Java programming language, and proposes some potential improvements for concurrent object-oriented software development. Java's passive object model does not provide an effective means for building distributed applications, critical for the future of Web-based next-generation information systems. Suggests improvements to Java's existing mechanisms for maintaining consistency across multiple threads, sending asynchronous messages and controlling resources. Drives the discussion with examples and suggestions from work on the Actor model of computation
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  8. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.17 
    0.1657999 = sum of:
  0.072158866 = product of:
    0.21647659 = sum of:
      0.21647659 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21647659 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.093641035 = sum of:
    0.051617 = weight(_text_:web in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051617 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.042024035 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042024035 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  9. Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000) 0.16 
    0.15590811 = sum of:
  0.032270424 = product of:
    0.096811265 = sum of:
      0.096811265 = weight(_text_:objects in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.096811265 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.123637676 = sum of:
    0.08161364 = weight(_text_:web in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08161364 = score(doc=6959,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
    0.042024035 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042024035 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
    Abstract
    The success of the World Wide Web Shows that we can access, search, and retrieve information from globally distributed databases. lf a database, such as a library catalog, has some sort of Web-based front end, we can type its URL into a Web browser and use its HTML-based forms to search for items in that database. Depending an how well the query conforms to the database content, how the search engine interprets the query, and how the server formats the results into HTML, we might actually find something usable. While the first two issues depend an ourselves and the server, an the Web the latter falls to the mercy of HTML, which we all know as a great destroyer of information because it codes for display but not for content description. When looking at an HTML-formatted display, we must depend an our own interpretation to recognize such entities as author names, titles, and subject identifiers. The Web browser can do nothing but display the information. lf we want some other view of the result, such as sorting the records by date (provided it offers such an option to begin with), the server must do it. This makes poor use of the computing power we have at the desktop (or even laptop), which, unless it involves retrieving more records, could easily do the result Set manipulation that we currently send back to the server. Despite having personal computers wich immense computational power, as far as information retrieval goes, we still essentially use them as dumb terminals.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  10. Nanfito, N.: ¬The indexed Web : engineering tools for cataloging, storing and delivering Web based documents (1999) 0.16 
    0.15546715 = product of:
  0.3109343 = sum of:
    0.3109343 = sum of:
      0.1445276 = weight(_text_:web in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1445276 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.71389294 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.16640669 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16640669 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2001 12:22:47
    Source
    Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22
  11. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.16 
    0.15511046 = sum of:
  0.04517859 = product of:
    0.13553576 = sum of:
      0.13553576 = weight(_text_:objects in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13553576 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.10993187 = sum of:
    0.05109822 = weight(_text_:web in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05109822 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    0.058833648 = weight(_text_:22 in 597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058833648 = score(doc=597,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 597, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=597)
    Abstract
    This paper considers the relevance of Charles Ami Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to the uiniverse of Internet accessible digital objects and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. The paper examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the World Wide Web. THe authors identify emerging techniques and technologies that can be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloging to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.25-42
  12. Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010) 0.16 
    0.15511046 = sum of:
  0.04517859 = product of:
    0.13553576 = sum of:
      0.13553576 = weight(_text_:objects in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13553576 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.10993187 = sum of:
    0.05109822 = weight(_text_:web in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05109822 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    0.058833648 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058833648 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
    Abstract
    We present three fundamental, interrelated approaches to support multiple access paths to each terminal object in information hierarchies: faceted classification, faceted search, and web directories with embedded symbolic links. This survey aims to demonstrate how each approach supports users who seek information from multiple perspectives. We achieve this by exploring each approach, the relationships between these approaches, including tradeoffs, and how they can be used in concert, while focusing on a core set of hypermedia elements common to all. This approach provides a foundation from which to study, understand, and synthesize applications which employ these techniques. This survey does not aim to be comprehensive, but rather focuses on thematic issues.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
  13. Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014) 0.16 
    0.15511046 = sum of:
  0.04517859 = product of:
    0.13553576 = sum of:
      0.13553576 = weight(_text_:objects in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13553576 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.10993187 = sum of:
    0.05109822 = weight(_text_:web in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05109822 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    0.058833648 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058833648 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
    Abstract
    This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.15 
    0.15109375 = sum of:
  0.038724504 = product of:
    0.11617351 = sum of:
      0.11617351 = weight(_text_:objects in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11617351 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.11236924 = sum of:
    0.061940394 = weight(_text_:web in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061940394 = score(doc=3387,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    0.05042884 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05042884 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
    Abstract
    Libraries are the tools we use to learn and to answer our questions. The quality of our work depends, among others, on the quality of the tools we use. Recent research in digital libraries is focused, on one hand on improving the infrastructure of the digital library management systems (DLMS), and on the other on improving the metadata models used to annotate collections of objects maintained by DLMS. The latter includes, among others, the semantic web and social networking technologies. Recently, the semantic web and social networking technologies are being introduced to the digital libraries domain. The expected outcome is that the overall quality of information discovery in digital libraries can be improved by employing social and semantic technologies. In this chapter we present the results of an evaluation of social and semantic end-user information discovery services for the digital libraries.
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  15. Koehler, W.: Web page change and persistence : a four-year longitudinal study (2002) 0.15 
    0.15008056 = sum of:
  0.07744901 = product of:
    0.23234703 = sum of:
      0.23234703 = weight(_text_:objects in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23234703 = score(doc=203,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.07263156 = product of:
    0.14526312 = sum of:
      0.14526312 = weight(_text_:web in 203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14526312 = score(doc=203,freq=22.0), product of:
          0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.717526 = fieldWeight in 203, product of:
            4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
              22.0 = termFreq=22.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=203)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Changes in the topography of the Web can be expressed in at least four ways: (1) more sites on more servers in more places, (2) more pages and objects added to existing sites and pages, (3) changes in traffic, and (4) modifications to existing text, graphic, and other Web objects. This article does not address the first three factors (more sites, more pages, more traffic) in the growth of the Web. It focuses instead on changes to an existing set of Web documents. The article documents changes to an aging set of Web pages, first identified and "collected" in December 1996 and followed weekly thereafter. Results are reported through February 2001. The article addresses two related phenomena: (1) the life cycle of Web objects, and (2) changes to Web objects. These data reaffirm that the half-life of a Web page is approximately 2 years. There is variation among Web pages by top-level domain and by page type (navigation, content). Web page content appears to stabilize over time; aging pages change less often than once they did
  16. Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016) 0.15 
    0.14899203 = sum of:
  0.054764725 = product of:
    0.16429417 = sum of:
      0.16429417 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16429417 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.094227314 = sum of:
    0.043798473 = weight(_text_:web in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043798473 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    0.05042884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05042884 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
  17. Ku, L.-W.; Ho, H.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Opinion mining and relationship discovery using CopeOpi opinion analysis system (2009) 0.14 
    0.13927831 = sum of:
  0.045637272 = product of:
    0.13691181 = sum of:
      0.13691181 = weight(_text_:objects in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13691181 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.093641035 = sum of:
    0.051617 = weight(_text_:web in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051617 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
    0.042024035 = weight(_text_:22 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042024035 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21723396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.062034417 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
    Abstract
    We present CopeOpi, an opinion-analysis system, which extracts from the Web opinions about specific targets, summarizes the polarity and strength of these opinions, and tracks opinion variations over time. Objects that yield similar opinion tendencies over a certain time period may be correlated due to the latent causal events. CopeOpi discovers relationships among objects based on their opinion-tracking plots and collocations. Event bursts are detected from the tracking plots, and the strength of opinion relationships is determined by the coverage of these plots. To evaluate opinion mining, we use the NTCIR corpus annotated with opinion information at sentence and document levels. CopeOpi achieves sentence- and document-level f-measures of 62% and 74%. For relationship discovery, we collected 1.3M economics-related documents from 93 Web sources over 22 months, and analyzed collocation-based, opinion-based, and hybrid models. We consider as correlated company pairs that demonstrate similar stock-price variations, and selected these as the gold standard for evaluation. Results show that opinion-based and collocation-based models complement each other, and that integrated models perform the best. The top 25, 50, and 100 pairs discovered achieve precision rates of 1, 0.92, and 0.79, respectively.
  18. Wenyin, L.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.: ¬A media agent for automatically builiding a personalized semantic index of Web media objects (2001) 0.13 
    0.13109097 = sum of:
  0.07744901 = product of:
    0.23234703 = sum of:
      0.23234703 = weight(_text_:objects in 6522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23234703 = score(doc=6522,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 6522, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6522)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.05364196 = product of:
    0.10728392 = sum of:
      0.10728392 = weight(_text_:web in 6522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10728392 = score(doc=6522,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 6522, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6522)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A novel idea of media agent is briefly presented, which can automatically build a personalized semantic index of Web media objects for each particular user. Because the Web is a rich source of multimedia data and the text content on the Web pages is usually semantically related to those media objects on the same pages, the media agent can automatically collect the URLs and related text, and then build the index of the multimedia data, on behalf of the user whenever and wherever she accesses these multimedia data or their container Web pages. Moreover, the media agent can also use an off-line crawler to build the index for those multimedia objects that are relevant to the user's favorites but have not accessed by the user yet. When the user wants to find these multimedia data once again, the semantic index facilitates text-based search for her.
    Theme
    Web-Agenten
  19. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.13 
    0.1294973 = sum of:
  0.0985271 = product of:
    0.2955813 = sum of:
      0.2955813 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2955813 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5259285 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.030970197 = product of:
    0.061940394 = sum of:
      0.061940394 = weight(_text_:web in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.061940394 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
    Source
    WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
  20. Qin, J.; Wesley, K.: Web indexing with meta fields : a survey of Web objects in polymer chemistry (1998) 0.13 
    0.12641719 = sum of:
  0.07744901 = product of:
    0.23234703 = sum of:
      0.23234703 = weight(_text_:objects in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23234703 = score(doc=3589,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.32971734 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.048968185 = product of:
    0.09793637 = sum of:
      0.09793637 = weight(_text_:web in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09793637 = score(doc=3589,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.20244996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.062034417 = queryNorm
          0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study of 4 WWW search engines: AltaVista; Lycos; Excite and WebCrawler to collect data on Web objects on polymer chemistry. 1.037 Web objects were examined for data in 4 categories: document information; use of meta fields; use of images and use of chemical names. Issues raised included: whether to provide metadata elements for parts of entities or whole entities only, the use of metasyntax, problems in representation of special types of objects, and whether links should be considered when encoding metadata. Use of metafields was not widespread in the sample and knowledge of metafields in HTML varied greatly among Web object creators. The study formed part of a metadata project funded by the OCLC Library and Information Science Research Grant Program

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 6683
  • m 815
  • el 591
  • s 333
  • x 108
  • r 44
  • b 43
  • i 40
  • n 16
  • p 9
  • ? 8
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications