Search (8627 results, page 1 of 432)

  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.23
    0.23276643 = product of:
      0.38794404 = sum of:
        0.29589686 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29589686 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.0415645 = weight(_text_:j in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0415645 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.050482683 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050482683 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.22
    0.22497426 = product of:
      0.5624356 = sum of:
        0.49316147 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49316147 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.069274165 = weight(_text_:j in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069274165 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.21
    0.20834474 = product of:
      0.34724122 = sum of:
        0.19382925 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19382925 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
        0.069274165 = weight(_text_:j in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069274165 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
        0.084137805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084137805 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  4. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.18
    0.1760883 = product of:
      0.2934805 = sum of:
        0.20143329 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20143329 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
        0.0415645 = weight(_text_:j in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0415645 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
        0.050482683 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050482683 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  5. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.18
    0.17604822 = product of:
      0.2934137 = sum of:
        0.2167077 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2167077 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.034637082 = weight(_text_:j in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034637082 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.042068902 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042068902 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  6. Polny, J. Montgomery => Montgomery Polny, J.: 0.17
    0.17482202 = product of:
      0.43705505 = sum of:
        0.23512433 = weight(_text_:j in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23512433 = score(doc=4709,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            1.1915612 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
        0.20193073 = weight(_text_:22 in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20193073 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    5. 9.2022 19:22:42
  7. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.14
    0.13739815 = product of:
      0.34349537 = sum of:
        0.09691463 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09691463 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.24658073 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24658073 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  8. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.14
    0.1353368 = product of:
      0.22556132 = sum of:
        0.11629755 = weight(_text_:objects in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11629755 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.058781084 = weight(_text_:j in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058781084 = score(doc=909,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.050482683 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050482683 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  9. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.13
    0.13498454 = product of:
      0.33746135 = sum of:
        0.29589686 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29589686 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.0415645 = weight(_text_:j in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0415645 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  10. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.13
    0.13210295 = product of:
      0.3302574 = sum of:
        0.27136093 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27136093 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.058896463 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058896463 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  11. Raper, J.: Geographic relevance (2007) 0.13
    0.12825838 = product of:
      0.21376395 = sum of:
        0.13705797 = weight(_text_:objects in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13705797 = score(doc=846,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
        0.034637082 = weight(_text_:j in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034637082 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
        0.042068902 = weight(_text_:22 in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042068902 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper concerns the dimensions of relevance in information retrieval systems and their completeness in new retrieval contexts such as mobile search. Geography as a factor in relevance is little understood and information seeking is assumed to take place in indoor environments. Yet the rise of information seeking on the move using mobile devices implies the need to better understand the kind of situational relevance operating in this kind of context. Design/methodology/approach - The paper outlines and explores a geographic information seeking process in which geographic information needs (conditioned by needs and tasks, in context) drive the acquisition and use of geographic information objects, which in turn influence geographic behaviour in the environment. Geographic relevance is defined as "a relation between a geographic information need" (like an attention span) and "the spatio-temporal expression of the geographic information objects needed to satisfy it" (like an area of influence). Some empirical examples are given to indicate the theoretical and practical application of this work. Findings - The paper sets out definitions of geographical information needs based on cognitive and geographic criteria, and proposes four canonical cases, which might be theorised as anomalous states of geographic knowledge (ASGK). The paper argues that geographic relevance is best defined as a spatio-temporally extended relation between information need (an "attention" span) and geographic information object (a zone of "influence"), and it defines four domains of geographic relevance. Finally a model of geographic relevance is suggested in which attention and influence are modelled as map layers whose intersection can define the nature of the relation. Originality/value - Geographic relevance is a new field of research that has so far been poorly defined and little researched. This paper sets out new principles for the study of geographic information behaviour.
    Date
    23.12.2007 14:22:24
  12. DiMarco, J.: Examining Bloom's Taxonomy and Peschl's Modes of Knowing for Classification of Learning Objects on the PBS.org/teachersource Website (2008) 0.12
    0.12350122 = product of:
      0.30875304 = sum of:
        0.27411595 = weight(_text_:objects in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27411595 = score(doc=2496,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.83047986 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
        0.034637082 = weight(_text_:j in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034637082 = score(doc=2496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    The delivery of learning objects, small chunks of stand alone core components of reusable instruction (Nugent 2005) are used extensively in k-12 environments. Learning objects are videos and animated clips which are deployed in classrooms through public television companion websites. One such site is PBS. org/teachersource. Scholars and institutional reports (Schaffer & Douglas 2004, Nugent 2005, and PBS 2003) have identified challenges with learning objects lacking reliable pedagogical and curricular context due to the need for interpretation of raw materials by teachers and students (Nugent 2005). Technical challenges in learning objects include pedagogy and context relationships, issues with metadata in digital portals, and digital rights to content. This is a study of metadata representations of learning objects. The goal of this study was to propose and apply a comparative taxonomy to classify learning objects based on Bloom's Taxonomy in 2006 and Peschl's modes of knowing in 2007, thus adding to the discourse on taxonomies present in learning object repositories and knowledge-oriented educational processes existing in public broadcasting and educational new media content domains. In an effort to re-examine the data and conclusions, I matched Bloom's model against modes of knowing keywords put forth by Peschl (2006). Matching the Peschl model against the Bloom model provided a new template to use in determining the cognitive level of learning objectives embedded in PBS TeacherSource website learning objects.
  13. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.12
    0.118358746 = product of:
      0.5917937 = sum of:
        0.5917937 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5917937 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  14. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.12
    0.11545986 = product of:
      0.28864965 = sum of:
        0.24658073 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24658073 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.042068902 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042068902 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  15. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.11
    0.114641204 = product of:
      0.286603 = sum of:
        0.21929276 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21929276 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.067310244 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067310244 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  16. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.11
    0.114641204 = product of:
      0.286603 = sum of:
        0.21929276 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21929276 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
        0.067310244 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067310244 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21746589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  17. Hjoerland, B.; Hartel, J.: Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains (2003) 0.11
    0.11339897 = product of:
      0.28349742 = sum of:
        0.2350055 = weight(_text_:objects in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2350055 = score(doc=3014,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.7119882 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
        0.048491918 = weight(_text_:j in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048491918 = score(doc=3014,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Domains are basically constituted of three kinds of theories and concepts: (1) ontological theories and concepts about the objects of human activity; (2) epistemological theories and concepts about knowledge and the ways to obtain knowledge, implying methodological principles about the ways objects are investigated; and (3) sociological concepts about the groups of people concerned with the objects. There are complicated relations between these elements. Basic theories about those relationships are, for example, forms of philosophical realism and social constructivism. In this paper these concepts and theories are introduced, and their implications for knowledge organization outlined, with illustrations drawn from this special issue of Knowledge Organization.
  18. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.11
    0.11248713 = product of:
      0.2812178 = sum of:
        0.24658073 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24658073 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.034637082 = weight(_text_:j in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034637082 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  19. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.11
    0.11248713 = product of:
      0.2812178 = sum of:
        0.24658073 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24658073 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52649 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.034637082 = weight(_text_:j in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034637082 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  20. Qin, J.; Wesley, K.: Web indexing with meta fields : a survey of Web objects in polymer chemistry (1998) 0.11
    0.109663844 = product of:
      0.2741596 = sum of:
        0.2325951 = weight(_text_:objects in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2325951 = score(doc=3589,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.33006936 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
        0.0415645 = weight(_text_:j in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0415645 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19732459 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06210065 = queryNorm
            0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study of 4 WWW search engines: AltaVista; Lycos; Excite and WebCrawler to collect data on Web objects on polymer chemistry. 1.037 Web objects were examined for data in 4 categories: document information; use of meta fields; use of images and use of chemical names. Issues raised included: whether to provide metadata elements for parts of entities or whole entities only, the use of metasyntax, problems in representation of special types of objects, and whether links should be considered when encoding metadata. Use of metafields was not widespread in the sample and knowledge of metafields in HTML varied greatly among Web object creators. The study formed part of a metadata project funded by the OCLC Library and Information Science Research Grant Program

Languages

Types

  • a 6963
  • m 952
  • s 488
  • el 441
  • x 80
  • r 60
  • i 54
  • b 49
  • p 13
  • ? 12
  • n 9
  • d 8
  • h 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications