Search (4276 results, page 1 of 214)

  1. Sauermann, L.; Kiesel, M.; Schumacher, K.; Bernardi, A.: Semantic Desktop (2009) 0.29 
    0.28993416 = product of:
  0.5798683 = sum of:
    0.5798683 = sum of:
      0.5248314 = weight(_text_:desktop in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.5248314 = score(doc=2416,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          1.3089371 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
      0.055036914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055036914 = score(doc=2416,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird gezeigt, wie der Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft aussehen könnte und wo das Semantic Web neue Möglichkeiten eröffnet. Dazu werden Ansätze aus dem Bereich Semantic Web, Knowledge Representation, Desktop-Anwendungen und Visualisierung vorgestellt, die es uns ermöglichen, die bestehenden Daten eines Benutzers neu zu interpretieren und zu verwenden. Dabei bringt die Kombination von Semantic Web und Desktop Computern besondere Vorteile - ein Paradigma, das unter dem Titel Semantic Desktop bekannt ist. Die beschriebenen Möglichkeiten der Applikationsintegration sind aber nicht auf den Desktop beschränkt, sondern können genauso in Web-Anwendungen Verwendung finden.
    Date
    3. 1.2012 16:00:22
    Object
    Semantic Desktop
  2. Williams, S.J.: Power and parity for the desktop database : Filemaker Pro 4.0 and Access '97 (1998) 0.26 
    0.2557489 = product of:
  0.5114978 = sum of:
    0.5114978 = sum of:
      0.43287364 = weight(_text_:desktop in 2744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.43287364 = score(doc=2744,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          1.0795931 = fieldWeight in 2744, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2744)
      0.07862416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07862416 = score(doc=2744,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2744, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2744)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Describes the desktop database and its architectures. compares and contrasts 2 of the moset widely used database programs today: Filemaker Pro 4.0 and Microsoft Access
    Date
    22. 1.1999 19:09:55
  3. Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001) 0.24 
    0.24177997 = product of:
  0.48355994 = sum of:
    0.48355994 = sum of:
      0.42852303 = weight(_text_:desktop in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.42852303 = score(doc=4121,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          1.0687426 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
      0.055036914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055036914 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
    Date
    28. 7.2006 20:09:22
  4. Johnson, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval (2000) 0.22 
    0.22254394 = sum of:
  0.030187903 = product of:
    0.09056371 = sum of:
      0.09056371 = weight(_text_:objects in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09056371 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.30843955 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.19235604 = sum of:
    0.15304396 = weight(_text_:desktop in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15304396 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
          0.058031123 = queryNorm
        0.3816938 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
    0.03931208 = weight(_text_:22 in 6959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03931208 = score(doc=6959,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.058031123 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6959, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6959)
    Abstract
    The success of the World Wide Web Shows that we can access, search, and retrieve information from globally distributed databases. lf a database, such as a library catalog, has some sort of Web-based front end, we can type its URL into a Web browser and use its HTML-based forms to search for items in that database. Depending an how well the query conforms to the database content, how the search engine interprets the query, and how the server formats the results into HTML, we might actually find something usable. While the first two issues depend an ourselves and the server, an the Web the latter falls to the mercy of HTML, which we all know as a great destroyer of information because it codes for display but not for content description. When looking at an HTML-formatted display, we must depend an our own interpretation to recognize such entities as author names, titles, and subject identifiers. The Web browser can do nothing but display the information. lf we want some other view of the result, such as sorting the records by date (provided it offers such an option to begin with), the server must do it. This makes poor use of the computing power we have at the desktop (or even laptop), which, unless it involves retrieving more records, could easily do the result Set manipulation that we currently send back to the server. Despite having personal computers wich immense computational power, as far as information retrieval goes, we still essentially use them as dumb terminals.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  5. bs: Startschuss zur Desktop Razzia (2005) 0.19 
    0.18743978 = product of:
  0.37487957 = sum of:
    0.37487957 = product of:
      0.74975914 = sum of:
        0.74975914 = weight(_text_:desktop in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.74975914 = score(doc=3251,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.058031123 = queryNorm
            1.86991 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die Suche nach Informationen und Dateien auf dem eigenen PC blieb bisher ein mühsames Unterfangen. Jetzt aber scheint die Zeit für eine neue, zentrale Desktop Anwendung gekommen. Die Schlacht um die Gunst des PC-Anwenders hat begonnen
    Object
    Google Desktop
    MSN Desktop
    Yahoo Desktop
    Series
    Software: Desktop-Suchmaschinen
  6. Güven, S.; Feiner, S.: ¬A hypermedia authoring tool for augmented and virtual reality (2003) 0.18 
    0.18109268 = sum of:
  0.051230572 = product of:
    0.15369171 = sum of:
      0.15369171 = weight(_text_:objects in 5935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15369171 = score(doc=5935,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.30843955 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 5935, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5935)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1298621 = product of:
    0.2597242 = sum of:
      0.2597242 = weight(_text_:desktop in 5935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2597242 = score(doc=5935,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.64775586 = fieldWeight in 5935, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5935)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Most existing hypermedia authoring systems are intended for use on desktop computers. These systems are typically designed for the creation of 2D documents and therefore employ 2D authoring mechanisms. In contrast, authoring systems for nontraditional multimedia/hypermedia experiences for 3D virtual or augmented worlds focus mainly on creating separate media objects and embedding them within the user's surroundings. As a result, linking these media objects to create 3D hypermedia is a tedious manual task. To address this issue, we present an authoring tool for creating and editing linked 3D hypermedia narratives that are interwoven with a wearable computer user's surrounding environment. Our system is designed for use by authors who are not programmers, and allows them to preview their results on a desktop workstation, as well as with an augmented or virtual reality system.
  7. Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006) 0.18 
    0.17902422 = product of:
  0.35804844 = sum of:
    0.35804844 = sum of:
      0.30301154 = weight(_text_:desktop in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.30301154 = score(doc=5287,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.75571513 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
      0.055036914 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055036914 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:37:49
  8. Crüger, I.: Farbentheorie und Farbgestaltung (2000) 0.15 
    0.15388483 = product of:
  0.30776966 = sum of:
    0.30776966 = sum of:
      0.24487032 = weight(_text_:desktop in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24487032 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.6107101 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
      0.06289933 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06289933 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die moderne Informationstechnik bietet die vielfältigsten Möglichkeiten, Publikationen, ob fürs Internet oder für die Druckausgabe, farbig zu gestalten. Dadurch, dass die Handhabung von Bildbearbeitungs- und Grafik-Software im Bereich Desktop Publishing immer einfacher wird, wird sie schon lange nicht mehr ausschließlich von professionellen Designern, sondern von Fachleuten der verschiedensten Berufsgruppen benutzt. Die allerdings haben in den seltensten Fällen gelernt, wie man mit Farben richtig umgeht. Ihnen wird hier eine Einführung in die Farbentheorie geboten, verbunden mit Grundlagen für die praktische Farbgestaltung
    Date
    15.12.2000 20:22:37
  9. Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002) 0.15 
    0.15388483 = product of:
  0.30776966 = sum of:
    0.30776966 = sum of:
      0.24487032 = weight(_text_:desktop in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24487032 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.6107101 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.06289933 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06289933 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
  10. bs: Desktop-Schnüffler (2006) 0.15 
    0.15304396 = product of:
  0.3060879 = sum of:
    0.3060879 = product of:
      0.6121758 = sum of:
        0.6121758 = weight(_text_:desktop in 4958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6121758 = score(doc=4958,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.058031123 = queryNorm
            1.5267752 = fieldWeight in 4958, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4958)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    So manche Festplatte gleicht einem verstaubten, chaotischen Keller, in dessen finsteren Eingeweiden man nur ungern wühlt. Wer wertvolle Informationen trotzdem heben will, greift zur Desktop-Suchmaschine.
    Object
    Google Desktop
    Copernic Desktop Search
  11. Cataloger's desktop (1994) 0.15 
    0.15150577 = product of:
  0.30301154 = sum of:
    0.30301154 = product of:
      0.6060231 = sum of:
        0.6060231 = weight(_text_:desktop in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6060231 = score(doc=477,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.058031123 = queryNorm
            1.5114303 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Aid
    Cataloger's desktop
  12. bs: ¬Der gläserne PC (2005) 0.14 
    0.13688667 = product of:
  0.27377334 = sum of:
    0.27377334 = product of:
      0.5475467 = sum of:
        0.5475467 = weight(_text_:desktop in 3252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5475467 = score(doc=3252,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.058031123 = queryNorm
            1.3655893 = fieldWeight in 3252, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Lange hat es gedauert, bis die besonderen Fähigkeiten der EDV zum Auffinden von Informationen auch den Desktop-PC erreicht haben. Mittlerweile aber haben einige Branchengrößen die Katze aus dem Sack gelassen und ihre Desktop-Suchmaschinen kostenlos der Userschar vorgelegt. Doch welche Lösung ist die beste? Wir haben die wichtigsten Festplatten-Detektive gründlich durchleuchtet und stellen alle Vor- und Nachteile vor.
    Object
    Google Desktop Beta
    Yahoo Desktop Beta
    MSN Desktop Search Beta
  13. Kramer, A.: Such, Programm! : Elf kostenlose Desktop-Tools schnüffeln um die Wette (2005) 0.14 
    0.13688667 = product of:
  0.27377334 = sum of:
    0.27377334 = product of:
      0.5475467 = sum of:
        0.5475467 = weight(_text_:desktop in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5475467 = score(doc=4560,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.058031123 = queryNorm
            1.3655893 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Copernic Desktop Search
    Google Desktop
    Hotbot Desktop 1.0
    Yahoo Desktop Search 1.1
  14. Fordahl, M.: Mit Google den PC durchforsten : Kleines Programm erstellt in rechenfreien Zeiten einen Index (2004) 0.14 
    0.13601625 = product of:
  0.2720325 = sum of:
    0.2720325 = sum of:
      0.21643682 = weight(_text_:desktop in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21643682 = score(doc=4209,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.53979653 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
      0.055595677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055595677 = score(doc=4209,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Die Google-Suche nach Dateien im Internet kann nun auch auf en eigenen PC ausgedehnt werden. Ein kleines kostenloses Programm, das sich am unteren Bildschirmrand einnistet, startet die Volltextsuche auf der Festplatte. Google erfasst den Inhalt aller Web-Seiten und Dokumente im Microsoft-Office-Format sowie die Namen sonstiger Dateien und zeigt die Trefferliste im Browser in der vertrauten Liste an - allerdings nur auf Computern mit Windows 2000 oder Windows XE Bei der Entwicklung dieses Werkzeugs hat Google sowohl die eigene Suchtechnologie als auch eine Schwäche von Windows ausgenutzt. Bei der "Desktop-Suche" kommt der gleiche Algorithmus zum Einsatz wie bei der Internet-Suche. Für die dazu benötigte Datenbank wird der Index-Dienst von Windows verwendet, der nur wenigen Anwendern bekannt ist, weil er etwas kompliziert und obendrein ziemlich langsam ist. Das neue Google Tool erstellt selbst diesen Suchindex für die Dateien in der Zeit, wenn der Computer gerade untätig ist. Sobald das 400 KB große Programm heruntergeladen und installiert ist, fängt es damit an, den PC zu durchforsten. Bei gut gefüllten Festplatten dauert es ein paar Stunden oder auch ein paar Tage, bis dieser Vorgang abgeschlossen ist. Sobald der Prozessor 30 Sekunden nichts zu tun hat, wird die Arbeit am Index aufgenommen beziehungsweise fortgesetzt. Ist er fertig, bietet diese Datenbank das Material, auf den sich der Google- Algorithmus stürzt, sobald eine Suchanfrage gestartet wird. Die meisten Google-Tricks für die Suche nach Web-Seiten, Bildern oder Beiträgen in Newsgroups funktionieren auch bei der Desktop-Suche."
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Source
    Bergische Landeszeitung. Nr.247 vom 21.10.2004, S.22
  15. Vlaeminck, S.; Wagner, G.G.: Ergebnisse einer Befragung von wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern im Bereich der Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Zur Rolle von Forschungsdatenzentren beim Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten (2014) 0.13 
    0.13464922 = product of:
  0.26929843 = sum of:
    0.26929843 = sum of:
      0.21426152 = weight(_text_:desktop in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21426152 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.5343713 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
      0.055036914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055036914 = score(doc=2543,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2543, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2543)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Ergebnisse einer Analyse zusammengefasst, in der untersucht wurde, ob, und wenn ja welche Services für das Management von publikationsbezogenen Forschungsdaten gegenwärtig bei wissenschaftlichen Infrastrukturdienstleistern in den Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften bestehen. Die Analyse wurde Mithilfe von Desktop-Research sowie einer Online-Befragung, an der sich 22 von 46 angeschriebenen Institutionen beteiligten, durchgeführt. Untersucht wurden vor allem deutsche und europäische Forschungsdatenzentren, Bibliotheken und Archive. Insbesondere wurde untersucht, ob diese Organisationen extern erzeugte Forschungsdaten, den dazugehörigen Berechnungscode (Syntax) und ggf. genutzte (selbstgeschriebene) Software grundsätzlich speichern und hosten. Weitere Themenfelder waren Metadatenstandards, Persistente Identifikatoren, Verfügbarkeit von Schnittstellen (APIs) und Unterstützung von semantischen Technologien.
  16. Sauermann, L.: Semantic Desktop : Der Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft (2006) 0.12 
    0.12243516 = product of:
  0.24487032 = sum of:
    0.24487032 = product of:
      0.48974064 = sum of:
        0.48974064 = weight(_text_:desktop in 4871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48974064 = score(doc=4871,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.058031123 = queryNorm
            1.2214202 = fieldWeight in 4871, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4871)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft wird anders sein als der heutige Status Quo, die Änderungen finden auf verschiedenen Ebenen statt: Technik, Informationsrepräsentation und soziale Verhaltensweisen. In diesem Kapitel werden aktuelle Ansätze aus verschiedenen Forschungsgebieten beschrieben und kombiniert, von Semantic Web bis zu Visualisierung. Semantische Technologien ermöglichen es, die bestehenden Daten eines Benutzers neu zu interpretieren und zu verwenden, dabei bringt die Kombination von Semantic Web und Desktop Computern besondere Vorteile, ein Paradigma, das unter dem Titel Semantic Desktop vorgestellt wird.
    Object
    Semantic Desktop
  17. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12 
    0.11575606 = sum of:
  0.09216881 = product of:
    0.27650642 = sum of:
      0.27650642 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.27650642 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4919885 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.023587247 = product of:
    0.047174495 = sum of:
      0.047174495 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047174495 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  18. Medelsohn, L.D.: Chemistry journals : the transition from paper to electronic with lessons for other disciplines (2003) 0.12 
    0.11541361 = product of:
  0.23082723 = sum of:
    0.23082723 = sum of:
      0.18365273 = weight(_text_:desktop in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18365273 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.45803255 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
      0.047174495 = weight(_text_:22 in 1871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047174495 = score(doc=1871,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1871, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1871)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Chemical information sciences-ranging from subjectspecific bibliometrics to sophisticated theoretical systems for modeling structures and reactions-have historically led in developing new technologies. Hundreds of papers are published or presented at conferences annually in this discipline. One of the more significant conferences at which important research has historically been presented is the Tri-Society Symposium an Chemical Information, an event jointly sponsored by the American Chemical Society, the American Society for Information Science and Technology, and the Special Libraries Association and held every four years. Eight years ago, the theme of this conference was the chemist's workstation; papers were presented an developments enabling chemists to access and process a variety of different types of chemical information from their desktop or laboratory bench. Several of these papers were subsequently published as a Perspectives issue.
    Date
    19.10.2003 17:17:22
  19. Stapleton, M.; Adams, M.: Faceted categorisation for the corporate desktop : visualisation and interaction using metadata to enhance user experience (2007) 0.12 
    0.11541361 = product of:
  0.23082723 = sum of:
    0.23082723 = sum of:
      0.18365273 = weight(_text_:desktop in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18365273 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40096 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.45803255 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.047174495 = weight(_text_:22 in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047174495 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Mark Stapleton and Matt Adamson began their presentation by describing how Dow Jones' Factiva range of information services processed an average of 170,000 documents every day, drawn from over 10,000 sources in 22 languages. These documents are categorized within five facets: Company, Subject, Industry, Region and Language. The digital feeds received from information providers undergo a series of processing stages, initially to prepare them for automatic categorization and then to format them ready for distribution. The categorization stage is able to handle 98% of documents automatically, the remaining 2% requiring some form of human intervention. Depending on the source, categorization can involve any combination of 'Autocoding', 'Dictionary-based Categorizing', 'Rules-based Coding' or 'Manual Coding'
  20. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.11 
    0.11204458 = sum of:
  0.08452612 = product of:
    0.25357836 = sum of:
      0.25357836 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25357836 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.30843955 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.027518457 = product of:
    0.055036914 = sum of:
      0.055036914 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055036914 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2032151 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.058031123 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3585
  • m 395
  • el 224
  • s 167
  • x 40
  • b 39
  • i 24
  • r 22
  • ? 8
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications