Search (4191 results, page 1 of 210)

0.39767912 = product of:
  0.79535824 = sum of:
    0.79535824 = sum of:
      0.73514867 = weight(_text_:assistants in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.73514867 = score(doc=43,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          1.5295364 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.06020958 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06020958 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.21751434 = product of:
  0.43502867 = sum of:
    0.43502867 = sum of:
      0.38987148 = weight(_text_:assistants in 3983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.38987148 = score(doc=3983,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.8111592 = fieldWeight in 3983, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3983)
      0.045157183 = weight(_text_:22 in 3983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045157183 = score(doc=3983,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3983, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3983)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The growing complexity of sources of information and users' needs for information is fast outstripping the manual browsing and searching interfaces of the past. A long-term approach to the complexity problem is to design intelligent information agents that provide active assistance in the process of finding and organizing information. These agents differ from conventional information retrieval in how they interact with the user and the dynamic nature of the information they deal with. This article surveys some work at the MIT Media Lab in developing intelligent informations, especially as assistants to users browsing the Web. These agents don't replace conventional browsing or direct manipulation interfaces, but work with such interfaces to learn from interaction with the user, anticipate the user's needs, and connect the user with othe people who may share his or her interests

Date

7. 8.1999 11:22:55

0.18715547 = product of:
  0.37431094 = sum of:
    0.37431094 = sum of:
      0.32162756 = weight(_text_:assistants in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.32162756 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.66917217 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
      0.05268338 = weight(_text_:22 in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05268338 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The management of library "pick-up books" - a phrase that refers to books pulled off the shelves by readers, discarded in the library after use, and picked up by library assistants for reshelving - is an issue for many collection managers. This research attempts to use geographic information system (GIS) software as a tool to monitor the use of such books so that their distributions by book shelf-ranges can be displayed visually. With GIS, library floor layouts are drawn as maps. This research produces some explanations of the habits of library patrons browsing shelved materials, and makes suggestions to librarians on the expansion of library collections and the rearrangement potential for library space.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.209-216

0.13926883 = product of:
  0.27853766 = sum of:
    0.27853766 = product of:
      0.5570753 = sum of:
        0.5570753 = weight(_text_:assistants in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5570753 = score(doc=808,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            1.1590403 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes a system of team cataloguing, based on tents taken from Total Quality Management and Employee Involvement management theories, implemented within the OCLC Cataloging Section of the Automated Services Unit at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library. The OCLC Cataloging Section employs 5 half time graduate assistants who are responsible for a substantial portion of the classification and copy editing of records for monographs. The workspace was redesigned so that the graduate assistants could increase their interactions, workflow was streamlined, line of communication were improved, training provided and a mentoring programme was implemented as a staff development initiative for the graduate assistants. The adoption of these measures has effectively eliminated a backlog of materials for which full level OCLC bibliographic records had been found

0.13784039 = product of:
  0.27568078 = sum of:
    0.27568078 = product of:
      0.55136156 = sum of:
        0.55136156 = weight(_text_:assistants in 5343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.55136156 = score(doc=5343,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            1.1471523 = fieldWeight in 5343, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5343)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.12995717 = product of:
  0.25991434 = sum of:
    0.25991434 = product of:
      0.5198287 = sum of:
        0.5198287 = weight(_text_:assistants in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5198287 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            1.0815456 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a brief overview of the structure of expert systems and the main features of intelligent agent software. Discusses the potential uses for intelligent agents and assistants in the following library and information centre activities: information retrieval and catalogue searching; reference services; referral services, such as to distance education students; indexing and abstracting; collection development and acquisition; classification of library materials; and library education. Few intelligent agents are commercially available at present but this should change over the next few years

0.11937329 = product of:
  0.23874658 = sum of:
    0.23874658 = product of:
      0.47749317 = sum of:
        0.47749317 = weight(_text_:assistants in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47749317 = score(doc=4652,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            0.99346316 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Today's knowledge workers have to spend a large amount of time and manual effort on creating, analyzing, and modifying textual content. While more advanced semantically-oriented analysis techniques have been developed in recent years, they have not yet found their way into commonly used desktop clients, be they generic (e.g., word processors, email clients) or domain-specific (e.g., software IDEs, biological tools). Instead of forcing the user to leave his current context and use an external application, we propose a ``Semantic Assistants'' approach, where semantic analysis services relevant for the user's current task are offered directly within a desktop application. Our approach relies on an OWL ontology model for context and service information and integrates external natural language processing (NLP) pipelines through W3C Web services.

Content

Vgl. unter: http://rene-witte.net/semantic-assistants-aswc08 [10.1007/978-3-540-89704-0_25].

0.110806 = sum of:
  0.08822741 = product of:
    0.26468223 = sum of:
      0.26468223 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.26468223 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4709497 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.022578591 = product of:
    0.045157183 = sum of:
      0.045157183 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045157183 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.10725324 = sum of:
  0.08091155 = product of:
    0.24273464 = sum of:
      0.24273464 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24273464 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.29524982 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02634169 = product of:
    0.05268338 = sum of:
      0.05268338 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05268338 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.

Date

21.11.2019 18:46:22

0.10694598 = product of:
  0.21389195 = sum of:
    0.21389195 = sum of:
      0.18378717 = weight(_text_:assistants in 6868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18378717 = score(doc=6868,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.3823841 = fieldWeight in 6868, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6868)
      0.03010479 = weight(_text_:22 in 6868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03010479 = score(doc=6868,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 6868, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6868)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: MARTIN, L.M. u. T.E. JACOBSON: Reflections on maturity: introduction to 'Library instruction revisited: bibliographic instruction comes of age'; BOBER, C., S. POULIN u. L. VILENO: Evaluating library instruction in academic libraries: a critical review of the literature, 1980-1993; SALONY, M.F.: The history of bibliographic instruction: changing trends from books to the electronic world; ALLEN, E.E.: Active learning and teaching: improving postsecondary library instruction; KLAVANO, A.M. u. E.R. KULLESEID: Bibliographic instruction: renewal and transformation in one academic library; HANSON, M.G.: Joining the conversation: collaborative learning and bibliographic instruction; OSBORNE, N.S. u. C. POON: Serving diverse library populations through the specialized instructional services concept; Whitehead, A. u. M.M. LONG: Providing off campus bibliographic instruction: when off campus means someone else's campus; MOECKEL, N. u. J. PRESNELL: Recognizing, understanding and responding: a program model of library instruction services for international students; HELMS, C.M.: Reaching out to the international students through bibliographic instruction; HULTS, P.: Noodling down the Internet: or, one foot in the last lane, the other stuck in the trenches; HUGHES, G.J.F., P.V. HOFFMANN u. C. DEMETRACOPOULOS: Cartobibliographic instruction: another path in the library instruction program; PIETTE, M.I.: Library instruction: principles, theories, connections and challenges; DOTY, P.: How index learning turns no student pale: an essay on rhetoric and bibliographic instruction; BLANDY, S.G.: Keeping library instruction alive; TURNER, D.J. u. M.E. GROTZKY: They teach too: a role for paraprofessionals in library instruction; RIELLY, L.J. u. G.A. BROWNING: Point of use instruction: the evolving role of stacks support staff and student assistants in an academic library; STRIFE, M.L.: Special libraries and instruction: one to one public relations

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of education for library and information science 37(1996) no.3, S.300-301 (C. Peterson); Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.5, S.399-400 (P.S. Thomas)

0.10241984 = product of:
  0.20483968 = sum of:
    0.20483968 = product of:
      0.3072595 = sum of:
        0.08669095 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08669095 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29524982 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.22056854 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22056854 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4709497 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.100634776 = sum of:
  0.020227887 = product of:
    0.06068366 = sum of:
      0.06068366 = weight(_text_:objects in 923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06068366 = score(doc=923,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29524982 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.20553327 = fieldWeight in 923, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=923)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.08040689 = product of:
    0.16081378 = sum of:
      0.16081378 = weight(_text_:assistants in 923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16081378 = score(doc=923,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.33458608 = fieldWeight in 923, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=923)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

They might appear intelligent, but LLMs are nothing of the sort. They don't understand the meanings of the words they are using, nor the concepts expressed within the sentences they create. When asked how to bring a cow back to life, earlier versions of ChatGPT, for example, which ran on a souped-up version of GPT-3, would confidently provide a list of instructions. So-called hallucinations like this happen because language models have no concept of what a "cow" is or that "death" is a non-reversible state of being. LLMs do not have minds that can think about objects in the world and how they relate to each other. All they "know" is how likely it is that some sets of words will follow other sets of words, having calculated those probabilities from their training data. To make sense of all this, I spoke with Gary Marcus, an emeritus professor of psychology and neural science at New York University, for "Babbage", our science and technology podcast. Last year, as the world was transfixed by the sudden appearance of ChatGPT, he made some fascinating predictions about GPT-4.
He doesn't dismiss the potential of LLMs to become useful assistants in all sorts of ways-Google and Microsoft have already announced that they will be integrating LLMs into their search and office productivity software. But he talked me through some of his criticisms of the technology's apparent capabilities. At the heart of Dr Marcus's thoughtful critique is an attempt to put LLMs into proper context. Deep learning, the underlying technology that makes LLMs work, is only one piece of the puzzle in the quest for machine intelligence. To reach the level of artificial general intelligence (AGI) that many tech companies strive for-i.e. machines that can plan, reason and solve problems in the way human brains can-they will need to deploy a suite of other AI techniques. These include, for example, the kind of "symbolic AI" that was popular before artificial neural networks and deep learning became all the rage.

0.0954912 = sum of:
  0.065386415 = product of:
    0.19615923 = sum of:
      0.19615923 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19615923 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29524982 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03010479 = product of:
    0.06020958 = sum of:
      0.06020958 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06020958 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68

0.0954912 = sum of:
  0.065386415 = product of:
    0.19615923 = sum of:
      0.19615923 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19615923 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29524982 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03010479 = product of:
    0.06020958 = sum of:
      0.06020958 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06020958 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.09542495 = sum of:
  0.057793967 = product of:
    0.1733819 = sum of:
      0.1733819 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1733819 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29524982 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.037630986 = product of:
    0.07526197 = sum of:
      0.07526197 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07526197 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.092338346 = sum of:
  0.07352285 = product of:
    0.22056854 = sum of:
      0.22056854 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22056854 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4709497 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.018815493 = product of:
    0.037630986 = sum of:
      0.037630986 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037630986 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.09189358 = product of:
  0.18378717 = sum of:
    0.18378717 = product of:
      0.36757433 = sum of:
        0.36757433 = weight(_text_:assistants in 2192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36757433 = score(doc=2192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            0.7647682 = fieldWeight in 2192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reports on efforts at the University of Florida to explore the team approach to original monograph cataloging and serials CONSER. The author describes how teams of librarians and assistants worked to produce a finished product in an effort to handle problematic materials. A major reworking of assignments and increased levels of professionalism and cooperation among the staff was noted as a result of the approach.

0.09189358 = product of:
  0.18378717 = sum of:
    0.18378717 = product of:
      0.36757433 = sum of:
        0.36757433 = weight(_text_:assistants in 6534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36757433 = score(doc=6534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.480635 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            0.7647682 = fieldWeight in 6534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.652365 = idf(docFreq=20, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6534)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Recent trends have brought great changes in academic reference services. Budget shortfalls, technological advances, changing responsibilities, and increased service demands have prompted many to examine alternative staffing arrangements. In this article, the authors describe a pilot project in an academic reference department where graduate assistants from academic units other than library and information science assist in the provision of reference, information, and instructional services. These students, compensated by tuition waivers and stipends, augment existing refrence services and are also well situated to reap other academic and professional benefits

0.08822741 = product of:
  0.17645483 = sum of:
    0.17645483 = product of:
      0.52936447 = sum of:
        0.52936447 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.52936447 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4709497 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05554955 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.0835548 = sum of:
  0.05721311 = product of:
    0.17163932 = sum of:
      0.17163932 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17163932 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29524982 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02634169 = product of:
    0.05268338 = sum of:
      0.05268338 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05268338 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19452506 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05554955 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24