-
Harvey, L.; Rousseau, R.: Development of text-editing skill : from semantic and syntactic mappings to procedures (1995)
0.02
0.024186898 = product of:
0.048373796 = sum of:
0.048373796 = product of:
0.14512138 = sum of:
0.14512138 = weight(_text_:objects in 3845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14512138 = score(doc=3845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3089067 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 3845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3845)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers whether joint syntax (a single step linking object and procedure) or disjoint, 2 step, processes are best suited to particular tasks of text editing. Finds that specific procedures are not necessarily faster to use than general ones. users of joint editors consulted the help menu less often and for longer and experienced a greater workload than users of disjoint editors. The experiment shows that general text editing procedures obeying a disjoint systax minimize workload. Specific objects and joint syntax are advanced features that should be reserved for experienced users
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.01
0.013915013 = product of:
0.027830025 = sum of:
0.027830025 = product of:
0.08349007 = sum of:
0.08349007 = weight(_text_:0 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08349007 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25048113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.309797 = idf(docFreq=1614, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.33331883 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.309797 = idf(docFreq=1614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Isbn
- 0-444-88493-9
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.01
0.013123874 = product of:
0.026247747 = sum of:
0.026247747 = product of:
0.07874324 = sum of:
0.07874324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07874324 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20352289 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
-
Rousseau, R.; Zuccala, A.: ¬A classification of author co-citations : definitions and search strategies (2004)
0.01
0.009939295 = product of:
0.01987859 = sum of:
0.01987859 = product of:
0.05963577 = sum of:
0.05963577 = weight(_text_:0 in 2266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05963577 = score(doc=2266,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25048113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.309797 = idf(docFreq=1614, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.23808488 = fieldWeight in 2266, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.309797 = idf(docFreq=1614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2266)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The term author co-citation is defined and classified according to four distinct forms: the pure first-author co-citation, the pure author co-citation, the general author co-citation, and the special co-authorlco-citation. Each form can be used to obtain one count in an author co-citation study, based an a binary counting rule, which either recognizes the co-citedness of two authors in a given reference list (1) or does not (0). Most studies using author co-citations have relied solely an first-author cocitation counts as evidence of an author's oeuvre or body of work contributed to a research field. In this article, we argue that an author's contribution to a selected field of study should not be limited, but should be based an his/her complete list of publications, regardless of author ranking. We discuss the implications associated with using each co-citation form and show where simple first-author co-citations fit within our classification scheme. Examples are given to substantiate each author co-citation form defined in our classification, including a set of sample Dialog(TM) searches using references extracted from the SciSearch database.
-
Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018)
0.01
0.009939295 = product of:
0.01987859 = sum of:
0.01987859 = product of:
0.05963577 = sum of:
0.05963577 = weight(_text_:0 in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05963577 = score(doc=5226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25048113 = queryWeight, product of:
4.309797 = idf(docFreq=1614, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.23808488 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.309797 = idf(docFreq=1614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Isbn
- 978-0-08-102474-4
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.007874325 = product of:
0.01574865 = sum of:
0.01574865 = product of:
0.047245946 = sum of:
0.047245946 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047245946 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20352289 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.007874325 = product of:
0.01574865 = sum of:
0.01574865 = product of:
0.047245946 = sum of:
0.047245946 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047245946 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20352289 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0052495496 = product of:
0.010499099 = sum of:
0.010499099 = product of:
0.031497296 = sum of:
0.031497296 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031497296 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20352289 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.058119014 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
