Search (8738 results, page 1 of 437)

  1. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.27
    0.26826623 = product of:
      0.44711035 = sum of:
        0.2714535 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2714535 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.11674028 = weight(_text_:system in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11674028 = score(doc=5455,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.5966609 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.058916554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058916554 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  2. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.19
    0.19095795 = product of:
      0.31826323 = sum of:
        0.19194663 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19194663 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.06740003 = weight(_text_:system in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06740003 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
        0.058916554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058916554 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Theme
    Content Management System
  3. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.18
    0.17622888 = product of:
      0.2937148 = sum of:
        0.16452567 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16452567 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.05777145 = weight(_text_:system in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05777145 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.07141765 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07141765 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
  4. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.15
    0.1453814 = product of:
      0.24230233 = sum of:
        0.13572675 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13572675 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
        0.04765902 = weight(_text_:system in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04765902 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
        0.058916554 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058916554 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  5. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.15
    0.1453814 = product of:
      0.24230233 = sum of:
        0.13572675 = weight(_text_:objects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13572675 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.04765902 = weight(_text_:system in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04765902 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.058916554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058916554 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  6. Dufour, C.; Bartlett, J.C.; Toms, E.G.: Understanding how webcasts are used as sources of information (2011) 0.14
    0.14289044 = product of:
      0.23815073 = sum of:
        0.13710473 = weight(_text_:objects in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13710473 = score(doc=4195,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
        0.058962744 = weight(_text_:system in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058962744 = score(doc=4195,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.30135927 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
        0.042083252 = weight(_text_:22 in 4195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042083252 = score(doc=4195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4195)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Webcasting systems were developed to provide remote access in real-time to live events. Today, these systems have an additional requirement: to accommodate the "second life" of webcasts as archival information objects. Research to date has focused on facilitating the production and storage of webcasts as well as the development of more interactive and collaborative multimedia tools to support the event, but research has not examined how people interact with a webcasting system to access and use the contents of those archived events. Using an experimental design, this study examined how 16 typical users interact with a webcasting system to respond to a set of information tasks: selecting a webcast, searching for specific information, and making a gist of a webcast. Using several data sources that included user actions, user perceptions, and user explanations of their actions and decisions, the study also examined the strategies employed to complete the tasks. The results revealed distinctive system-use patterns for each task and provided insights into the types of tools needed to make webcasting systems better suited for also using the webcasts as information objects.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:16:14
  7. Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004) 0.14
    0.14255546 = product of:
      0.23759241 = sum of:
        0.11633722 = weight(_text_:objects in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11633722 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.070755295 = weight(_text_:system in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070755295 = score(doc=2419,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.0504999 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0504999 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:22:48
  8. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.14
    0.13859908 = product of:
      0.3464977 = sum of:
        0.2959978 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2959978 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52666956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.0504999 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0504999 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  9. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.14
    0.13744502 = product of:
      0.34361252 = sum of:
        0.096947685 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096947685 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.24666484 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24666484 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52666956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  10. Ku, L.-W.; Ho, H.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Opinion mining and relationship discovery using CopeOpi opinion analysis system (2009) 0.14
    0.13639852 = product of:
      0.22733086 = sum of:
        0.13710473 = weight(_text_:objects in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13710473 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
        0.04814288 = weight(_text_:system in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04814288 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
        0.042083252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042083252 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    We present CopeOpi, an opinion-analysis system, which extracts from the Web opinions about specific targets, summarizes the polarity and strength of these opinions, and tracks opinion variations over time. Objects that yield similar opinion tendencies over a certain time period may be correlated due to the latent causal events. CopeOpi discovers relationships among objects based on their opinion-tracking plots and collocations. Event bursts are detected from the tracking plots, and the strength of opinion relationships is determined by the coverage of these plots. To evaluate opinion mining, we use the NTCIR corpus annotated with opinion information at sentence and document levels. CopeOpi achieves sentence- and document-level f-measures of 62% and 74%. For relationship discovery, we collected 1.3M economics-related documents from 93 Web sources over 22 months, and analyzed collocation-based, opinion-based, and hybrid models. We consider as correlated company pairs that demonstrate similar stock-price variations, and selected these as the gold standard for evaluation. Results show that opinion-based and collocation-based models complement each other, and that integrated models perform the best. The top 25, 50, and 100 pairs discovered achieve precision rates of 1, 0.92, and 0.79, respectively.
  11. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.13
    0.13473935 = product of:
      0.33684838 = sum of:
        0.2959978 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2959978 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52666956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.040850587 = weight(_text_:system in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040850587 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
    Source
    System Sciences, 2009. HICSS '09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference
  12. Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Automatic image indexation to support content-based retrieval (1992) 0.13
    0.13032697 = product of:
      0.3258174 = sum of:
        0.28496683 = weight(_text_:objects in 3032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28496683 = score(doc=3032,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.86305994 = fieldWeight in 3032, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3032)
        0.040850587 = weight(_text_:system in 3032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040850587 = score(doc=3032,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 3032, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3032)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents a new approach for the automatic interpretation of the content of graphical and pictorial images and the creation of access structures based on this analysis. The automatic indexation of images is necessary to support the access to a database of images, giving conditions of the semantic image content. The key aspect of the image analysis process is on the composition of objects, in terms of other objects, taking into account different interpretations and different levels of recognition. The image analysis process can be applied to images belonging to specific domains, described in advance to the system. Image analysis is performed in two steps: in the first step, simple objects are recognized starting from basic graphical/pictorial elements; in the second step, complex objects are recognized (applying domain rules) as compositions of simpler objects and different interpretations are generated. The image query language allows the user to express conditions on the objects to be found in the images, on their relative positions, on their interpretation and degree of recognition. A comprehensive example, based on 2D graphical images, is discussed, and the implemented prototype is described.
  13. Lunin, L.F.: Analyzing art objects for an image data base (1994) 0.13
    0.12575024 = product of:
      0.3143756 = sum of:
        0.23267443 = weight(_text_:objects in 2979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23267443 = score(doc=2979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 2979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2979)
        0.081701174 = weight(_text_:system in 2979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081701174 = score(doc=2979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 2979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2979)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Examines some of the facets to consider in planning an art information system that incorporates images of fiber art
  14. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.12
    0.12461263 = product of:
      0.2076877 = sum of:
        0.11633722 = weight(_text_:objects in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11633722 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
        0.040850587 = weight(_text_:system in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040850587 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
        0.0504999 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0504999 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  15. Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005) 0.12
    0.120395415 = product of:
      0.30098853 = sum of:
        0.26013795 = weight(_text_:objects in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26013795 = score(doc=5727,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
        0.040850587 = weight(_text_:system in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040850587 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
  16. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.12
    0.11839912 = product of:
      0.5919956 = sum of:
        0.5919956 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5919956 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52666956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  17. Quinn, C.N.; Boesen, M.; Kedziar, D.: Designing multimedia environments for thinking skill practices (1993) 0.12
    0.11607245 = product of:
      0.29018113 = sum of:
        0.19389537 = weight(_text_:objects in 8029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19389537 = score(doc=8029,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 8029, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8029)
        0.09628576 = weight(_text_:system in 8029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09628576 = score(doc=8029,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19565599 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 8029, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8029)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a story-based, complex content learning environment that provides generative support. Describes a system based on the story method in the form of interactive, reader-controlled adventure games. The system enables learners to not only control the characters but also to manipulate the objects in the story
  18. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.12
    0.115499236 = product of:
      0.2887481 = sum of:
        0.24666484 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24666484 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.52666956 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.042083252 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042083252 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  19. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.11
    0.11468031 = product of:
      0.2867008 = sum of:
        0.21936758 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21936758 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.06733321 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06733321 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  20. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.11
    0.11468031 = product of:
      0.2867008 = sum of:
        0.21936758 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21936758 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33018196 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
        0.06733321 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06733321 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21754007 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06212183 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications