Search (5710 results, page 1 of 286)

  1. Larmore, D.P.: ¬A new kid on the block : the start of a NACO Funnel Project and what is needed to start your own (2006) 0.56
    0.55720466 = product of:
      0.83580697 = sum of:
        0.7545568 = weight(_text_:funnel in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.7545568 = score(doc=5773,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.5072232 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052739903 = queryNorm
            1.4876227 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
        0.08125016 = product of:
          0.16250032 = sum of:
            0.16250032 = weight(_text_:project in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16250032 = score(doc=5773,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.7299641 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a new Program for Cooperative Cataloging NACO funnel project that was begun in August 2004 among four academic and one state library in South Dakota. The desire to start this project originated from the South Dakota State Library, whose cataloging staff wanted to receive training on authority record creation in order to create and update authority records for state agency names. Details the work and steps that go into creating a funnel project, the training process, and includes a brief discussion of the types and scope of records that the South Dakota NACO Funnel Project has created to date.
  2. McGurr, M.; Mason, C.; Monaco, M.: Public and academic library cataloging collaboration in Ohio's NACO Funnel Project (2013) 0.40
    0.40277284 = product of:
      0.60415924 = sum of:
        0.56011313 = weight(_text_:funnel in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.56011313 = score(doc=1940,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.5072232 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052739903 = queryNorm
            1.1042736 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
        0.044046097 = product of:
          0.08809219 = sum of:
            0.08809219 = weight(_text_:project in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08809219 = score(doc=1940,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.39571697 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers at The Ohio State University (OSU) Libraries, Columbus Metropolitan Library (CML), and Cleveland Public Library (CPL) are collaborating through the Ohio Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) funnel to create personal name authority records that directly benefit library patrons. Although OSU provides training and review, all three libraries receive value from the collaboration. There have been obstacles, however, such as cataloging training and workflow differences between public and academic libraries. This article will discuss the challenges and benefits of this interlibrary cataloger collaboration from the point of view of all three libraries, plans for the future, and best practices for other libraries that are interested in public/academic library collaborations of this kind.
    Object
    NACO Funnel Project
  3. Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011) 0.27
    0.26819184 = product of:
      0.40228775 = sum of:
        0.3772784 = weight(_text_:funnel in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3772784 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5072232 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052739903 = queryNorm
            0.74381137 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
        0.02500935 = product of:
          0.0500187 = sum of:
            0.0500187 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0500187 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:36:22
  4. Runcie, R.: Collaborative cataloging within a centralized network : the case of the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus (2013) 0.24
    0.23635119 = product of:
      0.3545268 = sum of:
        0.32338148 = weight(_text_:funnel in 1941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32338148 = score(doc=1941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5072232 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052739903 = queryNorm
            0.6375526 = fieldWeight in 1941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1941)
        0.031145293 = product of:
          0.062290587 = sum of:
            0.062290587 = weight(_text_:project in 1941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062290587 = score(doc=1941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 1941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    NACO Funnel Project
  5. Byrum Jr., J.D.: NACO: a cooperative model for building and maintaining a shared name authority database (2004) 0.20
    0.1969593 = product of:
      0.29543895 = sum of:
        0.26948455 = weight(_text_:funnel in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26948455 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5072232 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052739903 = queryNorm
            0.5312938 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.02595441 = product of:
          0.05190882 = sum of:
            0.05190882 = weight(_text_:project in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05190882 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.23317845 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Name Authority Cooperative (NACO), founded in 1976, now encompasses some 395 institutions that have collectively developed and maintained a database of more than 2,000,000 authority records in addition to the more than 3,500,000 records created by Library of Congress staff. The NACO family of libraries is expanding at a rate of about 50 new members annually. The membership include institutions from all but four of the 50 U.S. states and 43 institutions in 16 countries within Europe, Africa, Oceania, Asia, and Latin America. The NACO model has changed over time to create more cost-effective and user-friendly policies and procedures to meet participants' needs. Increased recognition, especially by library administrators, of the value of authority control also encouraged NACO to flourish. This presentation explains membership requirements, benefits to the participants, as well as the role of the Library of Congress which serves as secretariat to NACO and oversees a variety of training and documentation activities to support program operations. One of the NACO's unique features - the opportunity to participate via a "Funnel Project" in which a group of institutions band together - is also described. Internationally, as the trend towards adopting AACR and MARC 21 increases, the number of NACO partners outside the U.S. also increases. For countries where other standards prevail or where English is not the official language, NACO can serve as a model to consider to provide a framework for a national program while awaiting longer-term development of a more global approach to authority control.
  6. Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004) 0.13
    0.12746833 = product of:
      0.19120249 = sum of:
        0.038409553 = product of:
          0.11522866 = sum of:
            0.11522866 = weight(_text_:objects in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11522866 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28031632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15279293 = sum of:
          0.102774225 = weight(_text_:project in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.102774225 = score(doc=2843,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.4616698 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
          0.0500187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0500187 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
  7. Franks, A.R.D.; Cristán, A.: International cooperation in the program for cooperative cataloging : present and prospects (2000) 0.13
    0.12575947 = product of:
      0.3772784 = sum of:
        0.3772784 = weight(_text_:funnel in 5399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3772784 = score(doc=5399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5072232 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052739903 = queryNorm
            0.74381137 = fieldWeight in 5399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5399)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The past ten years have seen an expansion in participation by non-U.S. institutions in what were once solely American cooperative cataloging programs. Overlaying older bilateral relationships between national libraries, membership in the Program for Cooperative Cataloging has come to include willing institutions in a variety of organizational models: single membership, participation in a group ''funnel'' specially formed for the purpose, or as an outgrowth of a local bibliographic network. The resulting dispersion of bibliographic and authority work among many institutions gives rise to a welcome participatory model in standards and rule-setting.
  8. Ashton, J.; Kent, C.: FAST: a journey toward sustainability in subject indexing at the British Library (2023) 0.13
    0.12575947 = product of:
      0.3772784 = sum of:
        0.3772784 = weight(_text_:funnel in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3772784 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5072232 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052739903 = queryNorm
            0.74381137 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an update on progress since the partial roll-out of FAST in 2015 at the British Library. It discusses developments to the product and the provision of community interaction with FAST via a FAST funnel, ensuring the vocabulary is robust and flexible enough to meet the continued needs of Legal Deposit workflows. It describes the planning and implementation methods used in rolling out FAST to the majority of cataloging workflows at the British Library leading to extensive training over the autumn of 2022.
  9. Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008) 0.12
    0.116741076 = product of:
      0.1751116 = sum of:
        0.021948319 = product of:
          0.06584495 = sum of:
            0.06584495 = weight(_text_:objects in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06584495 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28031632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15316328 = sum of:
          0.12458117 = weight(_text_:project in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12458117 = score(doc=2664,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.5596283 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
          0.028582115 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028582115 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    DISC-UK DataShare (2007-2009), a project led by the University of Edinburgh and funded by JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee, UK), arises from an existing consortium of academic data support professionals working in the domain of social science datasets (Data Information Specialists Committee-UK). We are working together across four universities with colleagues engaged in managing open access repositories for e-prints. Our project supports 'early adopter' academics who wish to openly share datasets and presents a model for depositing 'orphaned datasets' that are not being deposited in subject-domain data archives/centres. Outputs from the project are intended to help to demystify data as complex objects in repositories, and assist other institutional repository managers in overcoming barriers to incorporating research data. By building on lessons learned from recent JISC-funded data repository projects such as SToRe and GRADE the project will help realize the vision of the Digital Repositories Roadmap, e.g. the milestone under Data, "Institutions need to invest in research data repositories" (Heery and Powell, 2006). Application of appropriate metadata is an important area of development for the project. Datasets are not different from other digital materials in that they need to be described, not just for discovery but also for preservation and re-use. The GRADE project found that for geo-spatial datasets, Dublin Core metadata (with geo-spatial enhancements such as a bounding box for the 'coverage' property) was sufficient for discovery within a DSpace repository, though more indepth metadata or documentation was required for re-use after downloading. The project partners are examining other metadata schemas such as the Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) versions 2 and 3, used primarily by social science data archives (Martinez, 2008). Crosswalks from the DDI to qualified Dublin Core are important for describing research datasets at the study level (as opposed to the variable level which is largely out of scope for this project). DataShare is benefiting from work of of the DRIADE project (application profile development for evolutionary biology) (Carrier, et al, 2007), eBank UK (developed an application profile for crystallography data) and GAP (Geospatial Application Profile, in progress) in defining interoperable Dublin Core qualified metadata elements and their application to datasets for each partner repository. The solution devised at Edinburgh for DSpace will be covered in the poster.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  10. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.11
    0.1074004 = product of:
      0.1611006 = sum of:
        0.038409553 = product of:
          0.11522866 = sum of:
            0.11522866 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11522866 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28031632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12269105 = sum of:
          0.07267235 = weight(_text_:project in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07267235 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.0500187 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0500187 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  11. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.10
    0.101861954 = product of:
      0.30558586 = sum of:
        0.30558586 = sum of:
          0.20554845 = weight(_text_:project in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20554845 = score(doc=3473,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.9233396 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
          0.1000374 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1000374 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  12. OCLC/LC fiction headings project : too little, too late? (1992) 0.09
    0.0934789 = product of:
      0.2804367 = sum of:
        0.2804367 = sum of:
          0.16610822 = weight(_text_:project in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16610822 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.74617106 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
          0.11432846 = weight(_text_:22 in 1298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11432846 = score(doc=1298,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1298, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1298)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 10:22:14
  13. Terry, J.: Electronic archiving : OCLC begins electronic archiving pilot project (1997) 0.09
    0.0934789 = product of:
      0.2804367 = sum of:
        0.2804367 = sum of:
          0.16610822 = weight(_text_:project in 7493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16610822 = score(doc=7493,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.74617106 = fieldWeight in 7493, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7493)
          0.11432846 = weight(_text_:22 in 7493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11432846 = score(doc=7493,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7493, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7493)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1997, no.226, Mar./Apr., S.21-22
  14. Li, X.: Designing an interactive Web tutorial with cross-browser dynamic HTML (2000) 0.09
    0.09205749 = product of:
      0.13808623 = sum of:
        0.032922477 = product of:
          0.09876742 = sum of:
            0.09876742 = weight(_text_:objects in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09876742 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28031632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.10516375 = sum of:
          0.062290587 = weight(_text_:project in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.062290587 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
          0.04287317 = weight(_text_:22 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04287317 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Texas A&M University Libraries developed a Web-based training (WBT) application for LandView III, a federal depository CD-ROM publication using cross-browser dynamic HTML (DHTML) and other Web technologies. The interactive and self-paced tutorial demonstrates the major features of the CD-ROM and shows how to navigate the programs. The tutorial features dynamic HTML techniques, such as hiding, showing and moving layers; dragging objects; and windows-style drop-down menus. It also integrates interactive forms, common gateway interface (CGI), frames, and animated GIF images in the design of the WBT. After describing the design and implementation of the tutorial project, an evaluation of usage statistics and user feedback was conducted, as well as an assessment of its strengths and weaknesses, and a comparison of this tutorial with other common types of training methods. The present article describes an innovative approach for CD-ROM training using advanced Web technologies such as dynamic HTML, which can simulate and demonstrate the interactive use of the CD-ROM, as well as the actual search process of a database.
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:21:22
  15. Renear, A.H.; Wickett, K.M.; Urban, R.J.; Dubin, D.; Shreeves, S.L.: Collection/item metadata relationships (2008) 0.09
    0.09205749 = product of:
      0.13808623 = sum of:
        0.032922477 = product of:
          0.09876742 = sum of:
            0.09876742 = weight(_text_:objects in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09876742 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28031632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.10516375 = sum of:
          0.062290587 = weight(_text_:project in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.062290587 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
          0.04287317 = weight(_text_:22 in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04287317 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Contemporary retrieval systems, which search across collections, usually ignore collection-level metadata. Alternative approaches, exploiting collection-level information, will require an understanding of the various kinds of relationships that can obtain between collection-level and item-level metadata. This paper outlines the problem and describes a project that is developing a logic-based framework for classifying collection/item metadata relationships. This framework will support (i) metadata specification developers defining metadata elements, (ii) metadata creators describing objects, and (iii) system designers implementing systems that take advantage of collection-level metadata. We present three examples of collection/item metadata relationship categories, attribute/value-propagation, value-propagation, and value-constraint and show that even in these simple cases a precise formulation requires modal notions in addition to first-order logic. These formulations are related to recent work in information retrieval and ontology evaluation.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  16. Kemmerling, A.: ¬Het MIRO-project : kennisachterstand in museale informatieverzorging structureel aangepakt (1994) 0.09
    0.08933747 = product of:
      0.1340062 = sum of:
        0.062079217 = product of:
          0.18623765 = sum of:
            0.18623765 = weight(_text_:objects in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18623765 = score(doc=3477,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28031632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.07192698 = product of:
          0.14385396 = sum of:
            0.14385396 = weight(_text_:project in 3477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14385396 = score(doc=3477,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.64620316 = fieldWeight in 3477, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Because of the individual character of museums the use of online catalogues to describe objects in the collections in the Netherlands has lagged behind that of libraries. In 1993 the MIRO (Museale Informatieverzorgingen Registratie Opleidingen) project was inaugurated to identify probllem areas and devise solutions. The project identified 4 areas for which training is required for museum staff: description of objects, compilation of indexes, automation in museums, and the use of multimedia systems. Following the project's report the Dutch government has dedicated extra funds for museum automation
  17. Introduction [to the ELINOR project] (1998) 0.08
    0.08375758 = product of:
      0.25127274 = sum of:
        0.25127274 = sum of:
          0.17981744 = weight(_text_:project in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17981744 = score(doc=1402,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.8077539 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
          0.07145529 = weight(_text_:22 in 1402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07145529 = score(doc=1402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1402)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    reviews the general outline of the ELINOR project, the first electronic library to be built in a UK university
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
    Source
    ELINOR: Electronic Library Project. Ed.: A. Ramsden
  18. Lavoie, B.F.: Web characterization project analyzes net content (1999) 0.08
    0.08179404 = product of:
      0.2453821 = sum of:
        0.2453821 = sum of:
          0.1453447 = weight(_text_:project in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1453447 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.6528997 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
          0.1000374 = weight(_text_:22 in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1000374 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1999, no.242, Nov/Dez., S.22-23
  19. Pavelsek, M.J.: Guidelines for evaluating e-journal providers with applications to JSTOR and project Muse (1998) 0.08
    0.08179404 = product of:
      0.2453821 = sum of:
        0.2453821 = sum of:
          0.1453447 = weight(_text_:project in 4701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1453447 = score(doc=4701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.6528997 = fieldWeight in 4701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4701)
          0.1000374 = weight(_text_:22 in 4701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1000374 = score(doc=4701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18468615 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052739903 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.39-57
  20. Cavallaro, U.: HIFI: hypertext interface for information : multimedia and relational databases (1993) 0.08
    0.080538236 = product of:
      0.12080735 = sum of:
        0.062079217 = product of:
          0.18623765 = sum of:
            0.18623765 = weight(_text_:objects in 4572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18623765 = score(doc=4572,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28031632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 4572, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4572)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.05872813 = product of:
          0.11745626 = sum of:
            0.11745626 = weight(_text_:project in 4572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11745626 = score(doc=4572,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22261414 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052739903 = queryNorm
                0.52762264 = fieldWeight in 4572, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    HIFI (ESPRIT project 6532) creates a set of tools to allow a reader to access a large body of heterogeneous information, managed by external databases created beforehand, through a hypertext interface. The HIFI approach is a model-based description of the hypertext application as it appears to the reader. A declarative and/or operational mapping translates hypertext operations (search, queries and navigation) into operations on the underlying information base and also 'materialises' hypertext objects, using objects of the underlying databases. The system supports hypertext development. Illustrates this with the cooperation of end users as partners or project sponsors

Languages

Types

  • a 4819
  • m 446
  • el 351
  • s 214
  • r 75
  • x 45
  • b 42
  • i 24
  • p 11
  • ? 8
  • n 7
  • d 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications