Search (4639 results, page 1 of 232)

  1. Redeker, G.H.J.: Learning Objects : Sequenzierung auf Grundlage pädagogischer Metadaten (2004) 0.16 
    0.16387609 = sum of:
  0.086390875 = product of:
    0.25917262 = sum of:
      0.25917262 = weight(_text_:objects in 3160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.25917262 = score(doc=3160,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.8137008 = fieldWeight in 3160, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3160)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.07748522 = product of:
    0.15497044 = sum of:
      0.15497044 = weight(_text_:liegt in 3160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15497044 = score(doc=3160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 3160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3160)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der primäre Fokus im Rahmen gegenwärtiger Standardisierungsdiskussionen zu Lerntechnologien liegt auf oekonomischen und technischen Aspekten. Ueberraschend wenig diskutiert werden dagegen instruktionelle bzw didaktische Optionen, die sich aus dem Leaming-Object-Ansatz ergeben. Zielsetzung des vorliegenden Beitrags ist es, eine didaktische Taxonomie und Meta Beschreibung für Leaming-Objects vorzustellen. Darauf aufbauend werden Moglichkeiten zur Beschreibung komplexer didaktischer Navigationsstrukturen und zur Sequenzierung von Learning-Objects dargestellt.
  2. Zbornik, S.: Elektronische Märkte, elektronische Hierarchien und elektronische Netzwerke : Koordination des wirtschaftlichen Leistungsaustausches durch Mehrwertdienste auf der Basis von EDI und offenen Kommunikationssystemen, diskutiert am Beispiel der Elektronikindustrie (1996) 0.14 
    0.13745224 = product of:
  0.2749045 = sum of:
    0.2749045 = sum of:
      0.19371304 = weight(_text_:liegt in 4148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19371304 = score(doc=4148,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.5976189 = fieldWeight in 4148, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4148)
      0.08119146 = weight(_text_:22 in 4148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08119146 = score(doc=4148,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4148, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4148)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Zugrunde liegt die Dissertation des Verfassers. - Rez. in: Nachrichten für Dokumentation 47(1996) H.3, S.187-188 (F. Glasen)
    Series
    Schriften zur Informationswissenschaft; Bd.22
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.13 
    0.12774357 = sum of:
  0.07931532 = product of:
    0.23794594 = sum of:
      0.23794594 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23794594 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5080533 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.04842826 = product of:
    0.09685652 = sum of:
      0.09685652 = weight(_text_:liegt in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09685652 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Werden Maschinen mit Begriffen beschrieben, die ursprünglich der Beschreibung des Menschen dienen, so liegt zunächst der Verdacht nahe, dass jene Maschinen spezifischmenschliche Fähigkeiten oder Eigenschaften besitzen. Für körperliche Fähigkeiten, die mechanisch nachgeahmt werden, hat sich in der Alltagssprache eine anthropomorphisierende Sprechweise bereits etabliert. So wird kaum in Frage gestellt, dass bestimmte Maschinen weben, backen, sich bewegen oder arbeiten können. Bei nichtkörperlichen Eigenschaften, etwa kognitiver, sozialer oder moralischer Art sieht dies jedoch anders aus. Dass mittlerweile intelligente und rechnende Maschinen im alltäglichen Sprachgebrauch Eingang gefunden haben, wäre jedoch undenkbar ohne den langjährigen Diskurs über Künstliche Intelligenz, welcher insbesondere die zweite Hälfte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts geprägt hat. In jüngster Zeit ist es der Autonomiebegriff, welcher zunehmend Verwendung zur Beschreibung neuer Technologien findet, wie etwa "autonome mobile Roboter" oder "autonome Systeme". Dem Begriff nach rekurriert die "Autonomie" jener Technologien auf eine bestimmte Art technologischen Fortschritts, die von der Fähigkeit zur Selbstgesetzgebung herrührt. Dies wirft aus philosophischer Sicht jedoch die Frage auf, wie die Selbstgesetzgebung in diesem Fall definiert ist, zumal sich der Autonomiebegriff in der Philosophie auf die politische oder moralische Selbstgesetzgebung von Menschen oder Menschengruppen beziehungsweise ihre Handlungen bezieht. Im Handbuch Robotik hingegen führt der Autor geradezu beiläufig die Bezeichnung "autonom" ein, indem er prognostiziert, dass "[.] autonome Roboter in Zukunft sogar einen Großteil der Altenbetreuung übernehmen werden."
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12 
    0.11953582 = sum of:
  0.09517838 = product of:
    0.28553513 = sum of:
      0.28553513 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.28553513 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5080533 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.024357436 = product of:
    0.048714872 = sum of:
      0.048714872 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048714872 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  5. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.12 
    0.115703136 = sum of:
  0.08728613 = product of:
    0.26185837 = sum of:
      0.26185837 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.26185837 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02841701 = product of:
    0.05683402 = sum of:
      0.05683402 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05683402 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  6. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.11 
    0.11048894 = product of:
  0.22097787 = sum of:
    0.22097787 = product of:
      0.3314668 = sum of:
        0.09352086 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09352086 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059926 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.23794594 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23794594 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5080533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059926 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  7. Rautenberg, M.: Konzeption eines Internetangebots für Kinder über Buchautoren und -autorinnen im Rahmen der europäischen virtuellen Kinderbibliothek CHILIAS (1997) 0.11 
    0.1099618 = product of:
  0.2199236 = sum of:
    0.2199236 = sum of:
      0.15497044 = weight(_text_:liegt in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15497044 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
      0.06495316 = weight(_text_:22 in 1491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06495316 = score(doc=1491,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1491, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1491)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Unter dem Projektnamen CHILIAS entsteht in den Jahren 1996-1998 in Kooperation verschiedener europäischer Partner die virtuelle Simulation einer Kinderbibliothek auf dem Internet. Hintergrund ist das EU-Förderprogramm Telematik für Bibliotheken. Ein Konzept für ein Internetangebote über Autoren und Literatur für Kinder als Zielgruppe wird erarbeitet. Durch den beispielhaften Entwurf einer Internetseite über die Schriftstellerin Astrid Lindgren wird das Konzept konkretisiert und veranschaulicht. Eine visuelle Umsetzung des Konzepts liegt im HTML-Format auf Diskette bei
    Date
    22. 7.1998 18:00:49
  8. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.11 
    0.1099618 = product of:
  0.2199236 = sum of:
    0.2199236 = sum of:
      0.15497044 = weight(_text_:liegt in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15497044 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
      0.06495316 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06495316 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Recycling eines Buchregisters Eine Index-Revision liegt dann vor, wenn das Register zu einer vorhergehenden Auflage eines Buches für die Neuauflage überarbeitet wird. Es gibt Vor- und Nachteile beim Versuch, einen Index zu überarbeiten - sowie verschiedene Erfolgsmaßstäbe. Eine detaillierte Fallstudie wir vorgestellt und die benutzte Software-Methode beschrieben.
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  9. Degkwitz, A.: Bologna, University 2.0 : Akademisches Leben als Web-Version? (2008) 0.11 
    0.107987285 = product of:
  0.21597457 = sum of:
    0.21597457 = sum of:
      0.13559912 = weight(_text_:liegt in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13559912 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
      0.08037544 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08037544 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die mit dem Bologna-Prozess eingeleiteten Veränderungen haben erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Weiterentwicklung der deutschen Hochschulen und Universitäten. Dies betrifft auch die Bereiche der Informationsinfrastruktur, für die sich neue Anforderungen und Herausforderungen aus dem Bologna-Prozess ergeben. Ökonomisierung und Technologisierung von Geschäfts- und Supportprozessen sind dabei wesentliche Antriebskräfte, die insbesondere die soziale Dimension akademischen Lebens und die damit verbundenen Werte zu verdrängen drohen: Auch in Zeiten von Bologna ist 'Universität, keine Web-Version! Deshalb sind Bibliotheken, Medien- und Rechenzentren sowie Verwaltungen gut beraten, auf der Plattform der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien und unter Einschluss betriebswirtschaftlicher Verfahren eine 'Vision von Qualität', zu entwickeln, wie sie in der Tradition des europäischen Universitätswesens liegt.
    Date
    22. 2.2008 13:28:00
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 55(2008) H.1, S.18-22
  10. Sandbothe, M.: Interaktivität - Hypertextualität - Transversalität : Eine medienphilosophische Analyse des Internet (1997) 0.11 
    0.10654292 = product of:
  0.21308585 = sum of:
    0.21308585 = sum of:
      0.16437097 = weight(_text_:liegt in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16437097 = score(doc=3183,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.5070964 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
      0.048714872 = weight(_text_:22 in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048714872 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Medien prägen unser Bild von der Wirklichkeit. Das gilt für die Medien im weiten, im engen und im engsten Sinn. Unter Medien im weiten Sinn verstehe ich die Anschauungsformen von Raum und Zeit. Sie fungieren als grundlegende Medien unseres Wahrnehmens und Erkennens, indem sie Gegenstände als identische Entitäten synthetisierbar machen. Diese Einsicht liegt der »kopernikanischen Wende« zugrunde, mit der Kant der modernen Philosophie das Fundament bereitet hat. Die nachkantische Philosophie hat von Hegel und Nietzsche über Heidegger, Dewey und den späten Wittgenstein bis Derrida, Goodman und Rorty vor Augen geführt, daß die Stärke dieses Fundaments in seiner Beweglichkeit, Offenheit und Veränderlichkeit liegt. Bei unseren raum-zeitlichen »Wei- sen der Welterzeugung« handelt es sich nicht um starre, uniforme und ahistorische Apparaturen. Die Medien menschlicher Wirklichkeitskonstruktion sind vielmehr geprägt durch bildliche, sprachliche und schriftliche Zeichensysteme, die historisch kontingent sind und kulturell divergieren.
    Date
    14.11.2009 18:47:22
  11. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.10 
    0.10301443 = sum of:
  0.07053785 = product of:
    0.21161354 = sum of:
      0.21161354 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21161354 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03247658 = product of:
    0.06495316 = sum of:
      0.06495316 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06495316 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  12. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.10 
    0.10301443 = sum of:
  0.07053785 = product of:
    0.21161354 = sum of:
      0.21161354 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21161354 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03247658 = product of:
    0.06495316 = sum of:
      0.06495316 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06495316 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  13. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.10 
    0.10294297 = sum of:
  0.06234724 = product of:
    0.18704171 = sum of:
      0.18704171 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18704171 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.04059573 = product of:
    0.08119146 = sum of:
      0.08119146 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08119146 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  14. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.10 
    0.09961318 = sum of:
  0.07931532 = product of:
    0.23794594 = sum of:
      0.23794594 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23794594 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5080533 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020297864 = product of:
    0.04059573 = sum of:
      0.04059573 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04059573 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  15. Gödert, W.; Oßwald, A.; Rösch, H.; Sleegers, P.: Evit@: Evaluation elektronischer Informationsmittel (2000) 0.10 
    0.096216574 = product of:
  0.19243315 = sum of:
    0.19243315 = sum of:
      0.13559912 = weight(_text_:liegt in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13559912 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
      0.05683402 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05683402 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Evit@ stellt ein Bewertungsinstrument bereit, mit dessen Hilfe qualitative Aussagen über elektronische Informationsmittel möglich werden. Eine Stärke des Verfahrens liegt auf der vergleichenden Produktanalyse und auf einem weitgehend entindividualisierten Ansatz. Das entwickelte Kriteriensystem geht in seiner Differenziertheit über alle bisherigen Ansätze hinaus. Das Verfahren der produkttypenbezogenen Gewichtung eignet sich besonders bei der quantifizierenden Beschreibung aller wesentlichen Eigenschaften und Leistungsmerkmale elektronischer Informationsmittel. Über eine eigens entwikkelte Softwarekomponente kann das Bewertungsergebnis sowohl auf jede einzelne Kategorie bezogen als auch in Form eines kondensierten Endergebnisses dargestellt werden. Diese Ergebnisse bieten im Sinne eines Qualitätsurteils Hilfestellung für Auswahl und Kaufentscheidungen. Für Produzenten elektronischer Informationsmittel kann Evit@ darüber hinaus als Checkliste zur Qualitätssicherung eingesetzt werden.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:00:32
  16. Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018) 0.10 
    0.096216574 = product of:
  0.19243315 = sum of:
    0.19243315 = sum of:
      0.13559912 = weight(_text_:liegt in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13559912 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.32414144 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
      0.05683402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05683402 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Open Access Archive für Fachdisziplinen unterscheiden sich von organisationseigenen Repositorien durch ihre geringere institutionelle Verankerung und konstitutive Translokalität. Aus ihrer Sicht fallen manche Schwierigkeiten der Open Access-Initiative besonders ins Gewicht. Am Beispiel eines kleinen disziplinären Repositoriums Sammelpunkt (für Philosophie) werden zwei Punkte hervorgehoben. Erstens finden sich Journalbeiträge (bisweilen in unterschiedlichen Versionen) immer häufiger in mehreren, offenen oder gebührenpflichtigen, Archiven. Und zweitens können spezialisierte Sammlungen der Anziehungskraft dominanter Portale im akademischen sozialen Netz nichts entgegensetzen. Die Gründe dieser Entwicklung sind zu analysieren. Eine konzeptuelle Unzulänglichkeit liegt darin, dass die publikumswirksame Rede vom offenen Zugang zur Forschungsliteratur bei näherem Hinsehen zu undifferenziert ist, um unbeabsichtigte Praktiken auszuschließen.
    Date
    20. 9.2018 12:22:52
  17. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.10 
    0.09517838 = product of:
  0.19035676 = sum of:
    0.19035676 = product of:
      0.57107025 = sum of:
        0.57107025 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.57107025 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.5080533 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059926 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  18. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.09 
    0.09013763 = sum of:
  0.061720617 = product of:
    0.18516184 = sum of:
      0.18516184 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18516184 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02841701 = product of:
    0.05683402 = sum of:
      0.05683402 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05683402 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  19. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.09 
    0.09013763 = sum of:
  0.061720617 = product of:
    0.18516184 = sum of:
      0.18516184 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18516184 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02841701 = product of:
    0.05683402 = sum of:
      0.05683402 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05683402 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  20. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.09 
    0.0900042 = sum of:
  0.069706336 = product of:
    0.209119 = sum of:
      0.209119 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.209119 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.31851095 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020297864 = product of:
    0.04059573 = sum of:
      0.04059573 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04059573 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20985064 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.059926 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3820
  • m 484
  • el 258
  • s 185
  • x 52
  • b 40
  • r 32
  • i 28
  • ? 8
  • p 6
  • n 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications