Search (4184 results, page 1 of 210)

  1. Lambert, N.: ORBIT'S PowerSearch : what's great, what's missing (1994) 0.33 
    0.32976204 = product of:
  0.8244051 = sum of:
    0.7506513 = weight(_text_:orbit in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7506513 = score(doc=2700,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5113917 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        1.4678597 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
    0.07375377 = weight(_text_:22 in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07375377 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Reviews the PowerSearch multifile searching software introduced by ORBIT Search Service as it is used for searching patent databases. Looks at its useful features: deduping, patent family grouping, merge, and virtual file merging. Looks at some possible improvements to both PowerSearch itself and to the ORBIT system to accomodate PowerSearch
    Source
    Searcher. 2(1994) no.5, S.18-22
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12 
    0.12145217 = product of:
  0.3036304 = sum of:
    0.25937817 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25937817 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46151215 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.044252258 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044252258 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12 
    0.12044088 = product of:
  0.3011022 = sum of:
    0.08495372 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08495372 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.21614847 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21614847 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46151215 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Online-Hosts für Wissenschaft, Technik und Medizin auf dem deutschen Informationsmarkt : Eine komparative Analyse (2005) 0.12 
    0.12010421 = product of:
  0.600521 = sum of:
    0.600521 = weight(_text_:orbit in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.600521 = score(doc=3335,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5113917 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        1.1742878 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Wir vergleichen die Content-Aggregatoren DataStar, DIALOG, DIMDI, FIZ Karlsruhe (STN International), FIZ Technik, Ovid, Questel-Orbit and Thomson Scientific's Web of Knowledge hinsichtlich ihrer Stellung auf dem Markt elektronischer Informationsdienste in Deutschland. Besprochen werden die Wettbewerbssituation sowie die Kooperationen, die Stärken bzw. Alleinstellungsmerkmale der Informationsanbieter und die kritischen Erfolgsfaktoren der WTMHosts. Marktführer ist in Deutschland eindeutig STN.
    Object
    Questel-Orbit
  5. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.12 
    0.11579921 = product of:
  0.28949803 = sum of:
    0.23787038 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23787038 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.051627636 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051627636 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  6. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.10 
    0.103751265 = product of:
  0.51875633 = sum of:
    0.51875633 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.51875633 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46151215 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  7. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.10 
    0.10121014 = product of:
  0.25302535 = sum of:
    0.21614847 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21614847 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46151215 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.036876883 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036876883 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  8. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.10 
    0.10049253 = product of:
  0.2512313 = sum of:
    0.19222832 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19222832 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.05900301 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05900301 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  9. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.10 
    0.10049253 = product of:
  0.2512313 = sum of:
    0.19222832 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19222832 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.05900301 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05900301 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  10. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.10 
    0.09746448 = product of:
  0.2436612 = sum of:
    0.16990744 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16990744 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.07375377 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07375377 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  11. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.09 
    0.090735674 = product of:
  0.22683918 = sum of:
    0.1899623 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1899623 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.036876883 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036876883 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  12. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Intellectual property information : A comparative analysis of main information providers (2006) 0.09 
    0.09007816 = product of:
  0.4503908 = sum of:
    0.4503908 = weight(_text_:orbit in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4503908 = score(doc=210,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5113917 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.88071585 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    After modeling expert user needs with regard to intellectual property information, we analyze and compare the main providers in this specific information area (Thomson DIALOG, Esp@cenet by the European Patent Office, Questel-Orbit, and STN International) in terms of system content and system functionality. The key question is whether the main providers are able to satisfy these expert user needs. For patent information, some special retrieval features such as chemical structure search (including Markush search), patent family references and citations search, biosequence search, and basic informetric functionality such as ranking, mapping, and visualization of information flows are realized. Considering the results of information science research, the practice of patent information shows unexhausted improvement opportunities (e.g., the application of bibliographic patent coupling and co-patent-citation for mapping patents, patent assignees, and technology specialties). For trademark search, users need multiple truncated search (realized) as well as phonetic search and image retrieval (not realized yet).
    Object
    Questel-Orbit
  13. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.09 
    0.088330105 = product of:
  0.22082525 = sum of:
    0.176573 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.176573 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.044252258 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044252258 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  14. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.09 
    0.08793097 = product of:
  0.21982741 = sum of:
    0.16819978 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16819978 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.051627636 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051627636 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  15. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.09 
    0.08793097 = product of:
  0.21982741 = sum of:
    0.16819978 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16819978 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.051627636 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051627636 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  16. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.09 
    0.08645939 = product of:
  0.43229693 = sum of:
    0.43229693 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43229693 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.46151215 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  17. Smith-Cohen, D.: Developing an inhouse database from online sources (1993) 0.08 
    0.08492649 = product of:
  0.42463246 = sum of:
    0.42463246 = weight(_text_:orbit in 4277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42463246 = score(doc=4277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5113917 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.8303468 = fieldWeight in 4277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4277)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Describes the creation of a database of citations in a narrow subject area from references downloaded from commercial databases, with customised added indexing, for access by end users. The database was on the subject of biological environmental and physical aspects of arctic wetlands and was compiled by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Databases were selected from the DIALOG and ORBIT hosts and downloaded records were loaded into a database using Pro-Cite software and searched using Inmagic search software
  18. Rossall, D.: ¬The INSPEC database : engineering (1995) 0.08 
    0.08492649 = product of:
  0.42463246 = sum of:
    0.42463246 = weight(_text_:orbit in 3864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42463246 = score(doc=3864,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5113917 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.8303468 = fieldWeight in 3864, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3864)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    INSPEC is one of the largest-established and best known bibliographic databases for engineering information. It is available both online and on CD-ROM. INSPEC is produced in Stevenage, UK, by the Institution of Electrical Engineers. It is available on many major online host systems including BRS, Data-Star, Dialog, ESA-IRS, OCLC, Orbit and STN. Discusses the history of INSPEC services since 1898; content and coverage; magnetic tape services; the latest developments in full text and document delivery; and commitment to quality and the INSPEC 2 upgrade
  19. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.08 
    0.082701355 = product of:
  0.20675339 = sum of:
    0.14417124 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14417124 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.06258215 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06258215 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
  20. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.08 
    0.07797158 = product of:
  0.19492894 = sum of:
    0.13592593 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13592593 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2893332 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
    0.05900301 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05900301 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19062689 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05443637 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3512
  • m 381
  • el 217
  • s 164
  • x 40
  • b 39
  • i 23
  • r 22
  • ? 8
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications