Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Smiraglia, R.P."
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation : expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents (2006) 0.03
    0.03460042 = product of:
      0.13840169 = sum of:
        0.13840169 = weight(_text_:objects in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13840169 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata schemas tend to be rationally ordered instruments for the categorization of data about information objects. Instantiation has been demonstrated to be a universal phenomenon. Empirical analysis, both positivist and qualitative, has contributed to typologies of the properties of instantiation. This yields a naïve knowledge organization schema of instantiation. Bibliographic, museum, and archival analyses are compared to demonstrate the value of empirical derivation of categories. In this instance categories, once derived, are demonstrated to represent properties yielding typologies. The empirical generation of categories for knowledge organization is demonstrated.
  2. Smiraglia, R.P.: About knowledge organization : an editorial (2005) 0.02
    0.01977167 = product of:
      0.07908668 = sum of:
        0.07908668 = weight(_text_:objects in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07908668 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    What exactly is "knowledge organization?" It turns out there are many different definitions and not all scholars within the domain agree. The Consulting Editors of this journal have asked the ISKO Scientific Advisory Council to consider a concise definition of knowledge organization, and especially to consider its relationship with the more recently evolved term, "knowledge management," as well. The debate will likely be lengthy; I invite readers to watch these pages for developments as they become available. Of course, ISKO members have a common sensibility about the meaning of knowledge organization. Our Society's organizing charter says that "it is the aim of the Society to promote research, development and application of all methods for the organization of knowledge in general or of particular fields by integrating especially the conceptual approaches of classification research and artificial intelligence." The charter also specifies that "The Society stresses philosophicological, psychological and semantic approaches for a conceptual order of objects." Our journal's statement of scope and aims suggests we are interested in "questions of the adequate structuring and construction of ordering systems and on the problems of their use." Our aim as a journal is to provide "a forum for all those interested in the organization of knowledge on a universal or domain-specific scale, using concept-analytical or concept-synthetical approaches, as well as quantitative and qualitative methodologies." What we can gather from these statements is that the core of our domain is the ordering of what is known, that that ordering might be accomplished in various ways but that concepts are critical lynchpins, and that a wide variety of scientific approaches fall within our embrace. Still, as all scholars know, a definition of a tern may not include the term being defined; ergo, we cannot define knowledge organization as the organization of knowledge [!] - consequently we have charged ISKO to consider whether The Society can provide core definitions.
  3. Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008) 0.01
    0.0053640804 = product of:
      0.021456322 = sum of:
        0.021456322 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021456322 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    12. 6.2008 20:18:22