Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Broughton, V."
  1. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003) 0.03
    0.029657505 = product of:
      0.11863002 = sum of:
        0.11863002 = weight(_text_:objects in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11863002 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the way in which classification schemes can be applied to the organization of digital resources. The case is argued for the particular suitability of schemes based an faceted principles for the organization of complex digital objects. Details are given of a co-operative project between the School of Library Archive & Information Studies, University College London, and the United Kingdom Higher Education gateways Arts and Humanities Data Service and Humbul, in which a faceted knowledge structure is being developed for the indexing and display of digital materials within a new combined humanities portal.
  2. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.03
    0.025747584 = product of:
      0.10299034 = sum of:
        0.10299034 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10299034 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  3. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001) 0.02
    0.02471459 = product of:
      0.09885836 = sum of:
        0.09885836 = weight(_text_:objects in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09885836 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33668926 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Broughton is one of the key people working on the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (BC2). Her article has a brief, informative history of facets, then discusses semantic vs. syntactic relationships, standard facets used by Ranganathan and the Classification Research Group, facet analysis and citation order, and how to build subject indexes out of faceted classifications, all with occasional reference to digital environments and hypertext, but never with any specifics. It concludes by saying of faceted classification that the "capacity which it has to create highly sophisticated structures for the accommodation of complex objects suggests that it is worth investigation as an organizational tool for digital materials, and that the results of such investigation would be knowledge structures of unparalleled utility and elegance." How to build them is left to the reader, but this article provides an excellent starting point. It includes an example that shows how general concepts can be applied to a small set of documents and subjects, and how terms can be adapted to suit the material and users
  4. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.02
    0.015019425 = product of:
      0.0600777 = sum of:
        0.0600777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0600777 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  5. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.01
    0.012873792 = product of:
      0.05149517 = sum of:
        0.05149517 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05149517 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22182742 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06334615 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14