Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.046457335 = product of:
  0.09291467 = sum of:
    0.09291467 = sum of:
      0.07098418 = weight(_text_:translating in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07098418 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4287632 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.16555567 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
      0.021930497 = weight(_text_:22 in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021930497 = score(doc=3312,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.057227984 = queryNorm
          0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

303.48/33 22

DDC

303.48/33 22

Footnote

Throughout the book, the authors portray social informatics research as being underutilized and misunderstood outside the field, and they should be commended for acknowledging and addressing these problems head-on. Yes, there is resistance from ICT professionals and faculty and students in technical disciplines, most of whom have not been trained to consider social and institutional issues as part of their work. However, this stance sometimes results in a defensive tone. Social informatics research is repeatedly described as "systematic," "rigorous," and "empirically anchored," as if in preemptive response to doubts about the seriousness of social informatics scholarship. Chapter titles such as "Perceptions of the Relevance of Social Informatics Research" and "Raising the Profile of Social Informatics Research" contribute to this impression. Nonscholarly observers are dismissed as "pundits," and students who lack a social informatics perspective have "typically naïve" conceptualizations (p. 100). The concluding chapter ends not with a powerful and memorable synthesis, but with a final plea: "Taking Social Informatics Seriously." The content of the book is strong enough to stand on its own, but the manner in which it is presented sometimes detracts from the message. The book's few weaknesses can be viewed simply as the price of attempting both to survey social informatics research findings and to articulate their importance for such a diverse set of audiences, in such a brief volume. The central tension of the book, and the field of social informatics as a whole, is that on the one hand the particular-use context of an ICT is of critical importance, but furthering a social informatics agenda requires that some context-independent findings and tools be made evident to those outside the field. Understanding and Communicating Social Informatics is an important and worthwhile contribution toward reconciling this tension, and translating social informatics research findings into better real-world systems."

0.020625338 = product of:
  0.041250676 = sum of:
    0.041250676 = product of:
      0.12375202 = sum of:
        0.12375202 = weight(_text_:objects in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12375202 = score(doc=2354,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.30417082 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.4068504 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? How can hyperlinks reveal not just the value of a Web site but the politics of association? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such "methods of the medium" as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By "thinking along" with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, the events surrounding the Srebrenica massacre according to Dutch, Serbian, Bosnian, and Croatian Wikipedias, presidential candidates' social media "friends," and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).

0.0077536018 = product of:
  0.0155072035 = sum of:
    0.0155072035 = product of:
      0.031014407 = sum of:
        0.031014407 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031014407 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2023 18:25:18

0.0054826243 = product of:
  0.010965249 = sum of:
    0.010965249 = product of:
      0.021930497 = sum of:
        0.021930497 = weight(_text_:22 in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021930497 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20040265 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057227984 = queryNorm
            0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

303.48/33 22 (LoC)

DDC

303.48/33 22 (LoC)