-
Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff)
0.11
0.111532964 = sum of:
0.066322155 = product of:
0.19896646 = sum of:
0.19896646 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19896646 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42482576 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.04521081 = product of:
0.06781621 = sum of:
0.03387074 = weight(_text_:27 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03387074 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.19323751 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.033945475 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033945475 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- 1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
-
Pennington, D. Rasmussen => Rasmussen Pennington, D.:
0.11
0.10850595 = product of:
0.2170119 = sum of:
0.2170119 = product of:
0.32551783 = sum of:
0.16257955 = weight(_text_:27 in 951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16257955 = score(doc=951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.92754006 = fieldWeight in 951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=951)
0.16293828 = weight(_text_:22 in 951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16293828 = score(doc=951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=951)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2023 19:27:14
-
Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999)
0.11
0.108431935 = sum of:
0.054178964 = product of:
0.16253689 = sum of:
0.16253689 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16253689 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.054252975 = product of:
0.08137946 = sum of:
0.040644888 = weight(_text_:27 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040644888 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.23188502 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
0.04073457 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04073457 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
- Date
- 21.10.2000 15:01:22
- Source
- The World Wide Web and Databases: International Workshop WebDB'98, Valencia, Spain, March 27-28, 1998, Selected papers. Eds.: P. Atzeni et al
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.09
0.09316477 = sum of:
0.07958658 = product of:
0.23875974 = sum of:
0.23875974 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23875974 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42482576 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0135781905 = product of:
0.04073457 = sum of:
0.04073457 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04073457 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.09
0.09313488 = sum of:
0.07958658 = product of:
0.23875974 = sum of:
0.23875974 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23875974 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42482576 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013548296 = product of:
0.040644888 = sum of:
0.040644888 = weight(_text_:27 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040644888 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.23188502 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
- Date
- 2. 1.2016 17:27:19
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.09
0.09238902 = product of:
0.18477803 = sum of:
0.18477803 = product of:
0.27716705 = sum of:
0.07820059 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07820059 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.19896646 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19896646 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42482576 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983)
0.09
0.09042162 = product of:
0.18084323 = sum of:
0.18084323 = product of:
0.27126485 = sum of:
0.13548297 = weight(_text_:27 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13548297 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.77295005 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
0.1357819 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1357819 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.09
0.08882844 = sum of:
0.072987214 = product of:
0.21896164 = sum of:
0.21896164 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21896164 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.015841223 = product of:
0.047523666 = sum of:
0.047523666 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047523666 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000)
0.09
0.08733536 = product of:
0.17467073 = sum of:
0.17467073 = product of:
0.26200607 = sum of:
0.108386375 = weight(_text_:27 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108386375 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.61836004 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.15361969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15361969 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:22:27
-
Lathrop, L.: Indexing with Doc-to-help : an overview (1995)
0.09
0.08730234 = product of:
0.17460468 = sum of:
0.17460468 = product of:
0.261907 = sum of:
0.15328148 = weight(_text_:27 in 6810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15328148 = score(doc=6810,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.8744932 = fieldWeight in 6810, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6810)
0.108625524 = weight(_text_:22 in 6810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108625524 = score(doc=6810,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6810, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6810)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 10:22:27
- Source
- Keywords. 3(1995) no.1, S.1+27+30
-
Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: Investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies : a case of wild or tamed categorization? (2014)
0.08
0.08065146 = sum of:
0.026066866 = product of:
0.07820059 = sum of:
0.07820059 = weight(_text_:objects in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07820059 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.054584593 = product of:
0.08187689 = sum of:
0.03387074 = weight(_text_:27 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03387074 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.19323751 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.04800615 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04800615 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Previous studies of user-generated vocabularies (e.g., Golder & Huberman, 2006; Munk & Mork, 2007b; Yoon, 2009) have proposed that a primary source of tag agreement across users is due to wide-spread use of tags at the basic level of abstraction. However, an investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies did not support this notion. This study analyzed approximately 8000 tags generated by 40 subjects. Analysis of 7617 tags assigned to 36 online resources representing four content categories (TOOL, FRUIT, CLOTHING, VEHICLE) and three resource genres (news article, blog, ecommerce) did not find statistically significant preferences in the assignment of tags at the superordinate, subordinate or basic levels of abstraction. Within the framework of Heidegger's (1953/1996) notion of handiness , observed variations in the preferred level of abstraction are both natural and phenomenological in that perception and understanding -- and thus the meaning of "things" -- arise out of the individual's contextualized experiences of engaging with objects. Operationalization of superordinate, subordinate and basic levels of abstraction using Heidegger's notion of handiness may be able to account for differences in the everyday experiences and activities of taggers, thereby leading to a better understanding of user-generated tagging vocabularies.
- Date
- 5. 9.2014 16:22:27
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.08
0.07958658 = product of:
0.15917316 = sum of:
0.15917316 = product of:
0.47751948 = sum of:
0.47751948 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.47751948 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42482576 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020)
0.08
0.0776124 = sum of:
0.066322155 = product of:
0.19896646 = sum of:
0.19896646 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19896646 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.42482576 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.011290248 = product of:
0.03387074 = sum of:
0.03387074 = weight(_text_:27 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03387074 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.19323751 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.08
0.077086836 = sum of:
0.05898258 = product of:
0.17694774 = sum of:
0.17694774 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17694774 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018104255 = product of:
0.054312762 = sum of:
0.054312762 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054312762 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998)
0.08
0.077086836 = sum of:
0.05898258 = product of:
0.17694774 = sum of:
0.17694774 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17694774 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018104255 = product of:
0.054312762 = sum of:
0.054312762 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054312762 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996)
0.08
0.076418445 = product of:
0.15283689 = sum of:
0.15283689 = product of:
0.22925532 = sum of:
0.094838075 = weight(_text_:27 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094838075 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.54106504 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.13441724 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13441724 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 9.1997 19:22:27
- Source
- Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
-
Rauber, A.: Digital preservation in data-driven science : on the importance of process capture, preservation and validation (2012)
0.08
0.07610877 = sum of:
0.06256048 = product of:
0.18768142 = sum of:
0.18768142 = weight(_text_:objects in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18768142 = score(doc=469,freq=8.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.013548296 = product of:
0.040644888 = sum of:
0.040644888 = weight(_text_:27 in 469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040644888 = score(doc=469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.23188502 = fieldWeight in 469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=469)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Current digital preservation is strongly biased towards data objects: digital files of document-style objects, or encapsulated and largely self-contained objects. To provide authenticity and provenance information, comprehensive metadata models are deployed to document information on an object's context. Yet, we claim that simply documenting an objects context may not be sufficient to ensure proper provenance and to fulfill the stated preservation goals. Specifically in e-Science and business settings, capturing, documenting and preserving entire processes may be necessary to meet the preservation goals. We thus present an approach for capturing, documenting and preserving processes, and means to assess their authenticity upon re-execution. We will discuss options as well as limitations and open challenges to achieve sound preservation, speci?cally within scientific processes.
- Source
- Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives held in conjunction with the 16th Int. Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL) on September 27, 2012 in Paphos, Cyprus [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-912/proceedings.pdf]. Eds.: A. Mitschik et al
-
Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016)
0.07
0.07476405 = sum of:
0.05213373 = product of:
0.15640119 = sum of:
0.15640119 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15640119 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022630317 = product of:
0.06789095 = sum of:
0.06789095 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06789095 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Fan, J.; Gao, Y.; Luo, H.; Xu, G.: Automatic image automation by using concept-sensitive salient objects for image content representation (2004)
0.07
0.07471423 = sum of:
0.05213373 = product of:
0.15640119 = sum of:
0.15640119 = weight(_text_:objects in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15640119 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.26633358 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022580495 = product of:
0.06774148 = sum of:
0.06774148 = weight(_text_:27 in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06774148 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.38647503 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 12. 2.2005 14:27:19
-
Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989)
0.07
0.0723373 = product of:
0.1446746 = sum of:
0.1446746 = product of:
0.2170119 = sum of:
0.108386375 = weight(_text_:27 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108386375 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17528036 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.61836004 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4979727 = idf(docFreq=3636, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
0.108625524 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108625524 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17547363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05010913 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
