Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

0.032224182 = product of:
  0.064448364 = sum of:
    0.064448364 = product of:
      0.12889673 = sum of:
        0.12889673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12889673 = score(doc=5405,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5405, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5405)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22

0.026246116 = product of:
  0.05249223 = sum of:
    0.05249223 = product of:
      0.1574767 = sum of:
        0.1574767 = weight(_text_:objects in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1574767 = score(doc=487,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In information science, writing, printing, telecommunication, and digital computing have been central concerns because of their ability to distribute information. Overlooked is the obvious fact that these technologies fashion copies, and the theorizing of copies has been neglected. We may think a copy is the same as what it copies, but no two objects can really be the same. "The same" means similar enough as an acceptable substitute for some purpose. The differences between usefully similar things are also often important, in forensic analysis, for example, or inferential processes. Status as a copy is only one form of relationship between objects, but copies are so integral to information science that they demand a theory. Indeed, theorizing copies provides a basis for a more complete and unified view of information science.

0.024745075 = product of:
  0.04949015 = sum of:
    0.04949015 = product of:
      0.14847045 = sum of:
        0.14847045 = weight(_text_:objects in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14847045 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Three meanings of "information" are distinguished: "information-as-process"; "information-as-knowledge"; and "information-as-thing", the attributive use of "information" to denote things regarded as informative. The nature and characteristics of "information-as-thing" are discussed, using an indirect approach ("What things are informative?"). Varieties of "information-as-thing"include data, text, documents, objects, and events. On this view "information" includes but extends beyond communication. Whatever information storage and retrieval systems store and retrieve is necessarily "information-as-thing"

0.021651939 = product of:
  0.043303877 = sum of:
    0.043303877 = product of:
      0.12991163 = sum of:
        0.12991163 = weight(_text_:objects in 3028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12991163 = score(doc=3028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3028)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.021651939 = product of:
  0.043303877 = sum of:
    0.043303877 = product of:
      0.12991163 = sum of:
        0.12991163 = weight(_text_:objects in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12991163 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Ordinarily the word document denotes a textual record. Increasingliy sophisticated attempts to provide access to the rapidly growing quantity of available documents raised questions about what should be considered a document. Paul Otlet and other developed a functional view of document and discussed whether sculpture, museum objects, and live animals, could be considered documents. Suzanne Briet equates document with organized physical evidence. These ideas appear to resemble notions of 'material culture' in cultural anthropology and 'object as signs' in semiotics. Others, especially in the USA took a narrower view. New digital technology renews old questions and also old confusions between medium, message and meaning

0.016112091 = product of:
  0.032224182 = sum of:
    0.032224182 = product of:
      0.064448364 = sum of:
        0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064448364 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

13. 6.1996 19:22:20

0.014098079 = product of:
  0.028196158 = sum of:
    0.028196158 = product of:
      0.056392316 = sum of:
        0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056392316 = score(doc=4546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Library hi tech. 10(1992) no.4, S.7-22

0.010070057 = product of:
  0.020140113 = sum of:
    0.020140113 = product of:
      0.040280227 = sum of:
        0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040280227 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.059460267 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik