Search (4206 results, page 1 of 211)

  1. Wenyin, L.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.: ¬A media agent for automatically builiding a personalized semantic index of Web media objects (2001) 0.18 
    0.18275078 = product of:
  0.45687693 = sum of:
    0.21102121 = weight(_text_:objects in 6522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21102121 = score(doc=6522,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.7046855 = fieldWeight in 6522, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6522)
    0.24585572 = weight(_text_:crawler in 6522) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24585572 = score(doc=6522,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45711228 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.5378454 = fieldWeight in 6522, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6522)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A novel idea of media agent is briefly presented, which can automatically build a personalized semantic index of Web media objects for each particular user. Because the Web is a rich source of multimedia data and the text content on the Web pages is usually semantically related to those media objects on the same pages, the media agent can automatically collect the URLs and related text, and then build the index of the multimedia data, on behalf of the user whenever and wherever she accesses these multimedia data or their container Web pages. Moreover, the media agent can also use an off-line crawler to build the index for those multimedia objects that are relevant to the user's favorites but have not accessed by the user yet. When the user wants to find these multimedia data once again, the semantic index facilitates text-based search for her.
  2. Alqaraleh, S.; Ramadan, O.; Salamah, M.: Efficient watcher based web crawler design (2015) 0.16 
    0.15721165 = product of:
  0.3930291 = sum of:
    0.3548622 = weight(_text_:crawler in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3548622 = score(doc=1627,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.45711228 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.776313 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
    0.038166888 = weight(_text_:22 in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038166888 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to design a watcher-based crawler (WBC) that has the ability of crawling static and dynamic web sites, and can download only the updated and newly added web pages. Design/methodology/approach In the proposed WBC crawler, a watcher file, which can be uploaded to the web sites servers, prepares a report that contains the addresses of the updated and the newly added web pages. In addition, the WBC is split into five units, where each unit is responsible for performing a specific crawling process. Findings Several experiments have been conducted and it has been observed that the proposed WBC increases the number of uniquely visited static and dynamic web sites as compared with the existing crawling techniques. In addition, the proposed watcher file not only allows the crawlers to visit the updated and newly web pages, but also solves the crawlers overlapping and communication problems. Originality/value The proposed WBC performs all crawling processes in the sense that it detects all updated and newly added pages automatically without any human explicit intervention or downloading the entire web sites.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009) 0.14 
    0.14054655 = product of:
  0.35136634 = sum of:
    0.10551061 = weight(_text_:objects in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10551061 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
    0.24585572 = weight(_text_:crawler in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24585572 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45711228 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.5378454 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.
  4. Lehrke, C.: Architektur von Suchmaschinen : Googles Architektur, insb. Crawler und Indizierer (2005) 0.13 
    0.13116427 = product of:
  0.32791066 = sum of:
    0.28974378 = weight(_text_:crawler in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28974378 = score(doc=867,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.45711228 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.6338569 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
    0.038166888 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038166888 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Das Internet mit seinen ständig neuen Usern und seinem extremen Wachstum bringt viele neue Herausforderungen mit sich. Aufgrund dieses Wachstums bedienen sich die meisten Leute der Hilfe von Suchmaschinen um Inhalte innerhalb des Internet zu finden. Suchmaschinen nutzen für die Beantwortung der User-Anfragen Information Retrieval Techniken. Problematisch ist nur, dass traditionelle Information Retrieval (IR) Systeme für eine relativ kleine und zusammenhängende Sammlung von Dokumenten entwickelt wurden. Das Internet hingegen unterliegt einem ständigen Wachstum, schnellen Änderungsraten und es ist über geographisch verteilte Computer verteilt. Aufgrund dieser Tatsachen müssen die alten Techniken erweitert oder sogar neue IRTechniken entwickelt werden. Eine Suchmaschine die diesen Herausforderungen vergleichsweise erfolgreich entgegnet ist Google. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es aufzuzeigen, wie Suchmaschinen funktionieren. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf der Suchmaschine Google. Kapitel 2 wird sich zuerst mit dem Aufbau von Suchmaschinen im Allgemeinen beschäftigen, wodurch ein grundlegendes Verständnis für die einzelnen Komponenten geschaffen werden soll. Im zweiten Teil des Kapitels wird darauf aufbauend ein Überblick über die Architektur von Google gegeben. Kapitel 3 und 4 dienen dazu, näher auf die beiden Komponenten Crawler und Indexer einzugehen, bei denen es sich um zentrale Elemente im Rahmen von Suchmaschinen handelt.
    Pages
    22 S
  5. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.13 
    0.12570074 = product of:
  0.31425184 = sum of:
    0.26845157 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26845157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47765648 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.045800265 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045800265 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  6. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.12 
    0.124654055 = product of:
  0.31163514 = sum of:
    0.08792551 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08792551 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.22370964 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22370964 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47765648 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  7. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.12 
    0.11985003 = product of:
  0.29962507 = sum of:
    0.24619141 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24619141 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.053433646 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053433646 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  8. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.11 
    0.10738063 = product of:
  0.53690314 = sum of:
    0.53690314 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.53690314 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47765648 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  9. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.10 
    0.10475061 = product of:
  0.26187652 = sum of:
    0.22370964 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22370964 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47765648 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.038166888 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038166888 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  10. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.10 
    0.1040079 = product of:
  0.26001975 = sum of:
    0.19895272 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19895272 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.061067022 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061067022 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  11. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.10 
    0.1040079 = product of:
  0.26001975 = sum of:
    0.19895272 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19895272 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.061067022 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061067022 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  12. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.10 
    0.100873925 = product of:
  0.2521848 = sum of:
    0.17585102 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17585102 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.076333776 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076333776 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.09 
    0.09390973 = product of:
  0.23477432 = sum of:
    0.19660743 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19660743 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.038166888 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038166888 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  14. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.09 
    0.09142001 = product of:
  0.22855002 = sum of:
    0.18274975 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18274975 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.045800265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045800265 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  15. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.09 
    0.091006905 = product of:
  0.22751726 = sum of:
    0.17408362 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17408362 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.053433646 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053433646 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  16. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.09 
    0.091006905 = product of:
  0.22751726 = sum of:
    0.17408362 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17408362 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.053433646 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053433646 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
  17. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.09 
    0.08948386 = product of:
  0.4474193 = sum of:
    0.4474193 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4474193 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47765648 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  18. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.09 
    0.085594356 = product of:
  0.21398589 = sum of:
    0.14921454 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14921454 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29945445 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.06477136 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06477136 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1972953 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
  19. Thiele, J.: Sie haben 502.456 Treffer! (1999) 0.08 
    0.081951916 = product of:
  0.40975958 = sum of:
    0.40975958 = weight(_text_:crawler in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40975958 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45711228 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.89640903 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Object
    Crawler
  20. Reinke, S.; Schmidt, M.: Einmal suchen, alles finden : 7 Meta-Suchmaschinen im Test (2001) 0.08 
    0.081951916 = product of:
  0.40975958 = sum of:
    0.40975958 = weight(_text_:crawler in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40975958 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45711228 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05634063 = queryNorm
        0.89640903 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Von MetaSuchmaschinen oder Metacrawlern erwarten viele Datensucher Wunder. Die Crawler durchstöbern Kataloge von Suchmaschinen, fassen Ergebnisse zusammen, gleichen sie ab und präsentieren sie. CHIP hat sieben deutschsprachige, kostenlose Metacrawler getestet

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3533
  • m 382
  • el 221
  • s 164
  • x 40
  • b 39
  • i 23
  • r 22
  • ? 8
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications