Search (4222 results, page 1 of 212)

  1. Chen, Y.-L.; Chuang, C.-H.; Chiu, Y.-T.: Community detection based on social interactions in a social network (2014) 0.13 
    0.13231698 = product of:
  0.33079243 = sum of:
    0.10660155 = weight(_text_:objects in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10660155 = score(doc=1219,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
    0.22419086 = weight(_text_:friends in 1219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22419086 = score(doc=1219,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.51096666 = fieldWeight in 1219, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1219)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Recent research has involved identifying communities in networks. Traditional methods of community detection usually assume that the network's structural information is fully known, which is not the case in many practical networks. Moreover, most previous community detection algorithms do not differentiate multiple relationships between objects or persons in the real world. In this article, we propose a new approach that utilizes social interaction data (e.g., users' posts on Facebook) to address the community detection problem in Facebook and to find the multiple social groups of a Facebook user. Some advantages to our approach are (a) it does not depend on structural information, (b) it differentiates the various relationships that exist among friends, and (c) it can discover a target user's multiple communities. In the experiment, we detect the community distribution of Facebook users using the proposed method. The experiment shows that our method can achieve the result of having the average scores of Total-Community-Purity and Total-Cluster-Purity both at approximately 0.8.
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.13 
    0.12700044 = product of:
  0.31750107 = sum of:
    0.27122724 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27122724 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48259526 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.04627382 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04627382 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.13 
    0.12594293 = product of:
  0.31485733 = sum of:
    0.08883463 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08883463 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.2260227 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2260227 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48259526 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.12 
    0.12108922 = product of:
  0.30272305 = sum of:
    0.24873693 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24873693 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.053986125 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053986125 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  5. Trenner, L.: How to win friends and influence people : definitions of user-friendliness in interactive computer systems (1987) 0.12 
    0.119568445 = product of:
  0.5978422 = sum of:
    0.5978422 = weight(_text_:friends in 802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5978422 = score(doc=802,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        1.3625777 = fieldWeight in 802, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=802)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  6. Walsh, J.A.: "Images of God and friends of God" : the holy icon as document (2012) 0.11 
    0.11026414 = product of:
  0.27566034 = sum of:
    0.08883463 = weight(_text_:objects in 4974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08883463 = score(doc=4974,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4974, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4974)
    0.1868257 = weight(_text_:friends in 4974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1868257 = score(doc=4974,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.4258055 = fieldWeight in 4974, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4974)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Information studies, from origins in the field of documentation, has long been concerned with the question, What is a document? The purpose of this study is to examine Christian icons-typically tempera paintings on wooden panels-as information objects, as documents: documents that obtain meaning through tradition and standardization, documents around which a sophisticated scaffolding of classification and categorization has developed, documents that highlight their own materiality. Theological arguments that associate the icon with the Incarnation are juxtaposed with theories on the materiality of the document and "information as thing." Icons are examined as visual and multimedia documents: all icons are graphic; many also incorporate textual information. Icons emerge as a complex information resource: a resource-with origins in the earliest years of Christianity-that developed over centuries with accompanying systems of standardization and classification, a resource at the center of theological and political differences that shook empires, a primarily visual resource within a theological framework that affords the visual equal status with the textual, a resource with enduring relevance to hundreds of millions of Christians, a resource that continues to evolve as ancient and modern icons take on new material forms made possible through digital technologies. And crist was all, by reason as I preve, Firste a prophete by holy informacion, And by his doctryne, most worthy of byleve. -John Lydgate. Life of Our Lady. IV. II. 309-311 We confess and proclaim our salvation in word and images. -Kontakion of the Sunday of Orthodoxy
  7. Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Lipford, H.; Bello-Ogunu, E.: Facebook apps and tagging : the trade-off between personal privacy and engaging with friends (2015) 0.11 
    0.10983063 = product of:
  0.54915315 = sum of:
    0.54915315 = weight(_text_:friends in 2165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.54915315 = score(doc=2165,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        1.2516075 = fieldWeight in 2165, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2165)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The use of social network sites offers many potential social benefits, but also raises privacy concerns and challenges for users. The trade-off users have to make between using sites such as Facebook to connect with their friends versus protecting their personal privacy is not well understood. Furthermore, very little behavioral research has focused on how personal privacy concerns are related to information disclosures made by one's friends. Our survey study of 116 Facebook users shows that engaging with friends through tagging activity and third-party application use is associated with higher levels of personal Facebook usage and a stronger emotional attachment to Facebook. However, users who have high levels of personal privacy concern and perceive a lack of effectiveness in Facebook's privacy policies tend to engage less frequently in tagging and app activities with friends, respectively. Our model and results explore illustrate the complexity of the trade-off between privacy concerns, engaging with friends through tagging and apps, and Facebook usage.
  8. Rogers, R.: Digital methods (2013) 0.11 
    0.10902138 = product of:
  0.27255344 = sum of:
    0.123092875 = weight(_text_:objects in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.123092875 = score(doc=2354,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.4068504 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
    0.14946055 = weight(_text_:friends in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14946055 = score(doc=2354,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.34064442 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? How can hyperlinks reveal not just the value of a Web site but the politics of association? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such "methods of the medium" as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By "thinking along" with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, the events surrounding the Srebrenica massacre according to Dutch, Serbian, Bosnian, and Croatian Wikipedias, presidential candidates' social media "friends," and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).
  9. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.11 
    0.1084909 = product of:
  0.5424545 = sum of:
    0.5424545 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5424545 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48259526 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  10. Levergood, B.; Farrenkopf, S.; Frasnelli, E.: ¬The specification of the language of the field and interoperability : cross-language access to catalogues and online libraries (CACAO) (2008) 0.11 
    0.10818588 = product of:
  0.2704647 = sum of:
    0.22419086 = weight(_text_:friends in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22419086 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.51096666 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
    0.04627382 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04627382 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The CACAO Project (Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries) has been designed to implement natural language processing and cross-language information retrieval techniques to provide cross-language access to information in libraries, a critical issue in the linguistically diverse European Union. This project report addresses two metadata-related challenges for the library community in this context: "false friends" (identical words having different meanings in different languages) and term ambiguity. The possible solutions involve enriching the metadata with attributes specifying language or the source authority file, or associating potential search terms to classes in a classification system. The European Library will evaluate an early implementation of this work in late 2008.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Erickson, L.B.; Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.; Perkins, D.F.: ¬The boundaries between : parental involvement in a teen's online world (2016) 0.11 
    0.10818588 = product of:
  0.2704647 = sum of:
    0.22419086 = weight(_text_:friends in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22419086 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.51096666 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
    0.04627382 = weight(_text_:22 in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04627382 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The increasing popularity of the Internet and social media is creating new and unique challenges for parents and adolescents regarding the boundaries between parental control and adolescent autonomy in virtual spaces. Drawing on developmental psychology and Communication Privacy Management (CPM) theory, we conduct a qualitative study to examine the challenge between parental concern for adolescent online safety and teens' desire to independently regulate their own online experiences. Analysis of 12 parent-teen pairs revealed five distinct challenges: (a) increased teen autonomy and decreased parental control resulting from teens' direct and unmediated access to virtual spaces, (b) the shift in power to teens who are often more knowledgeable about online spaces and technology, (c) the use of physical boundaries by parents as a means to control virtual spaces, (d) an increase in indirect boundary control strategies such as covert monitoring, and (e) the blurring of lines in virtual spaces between parents' teens and teens' friends.
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:05:22
  12. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.11 
    0.10583369 = product of:
  0.2645842 = sum of:
    0.2260227 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2260227 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48259526 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.03856152 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03856152 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  13. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.11 
    0.1050833 = product of:
  0.26270825 = sum of:
    0.20100981 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20100981 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.06169843 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06169843 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  14. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.11 
    0.1050833 = product of:
  0.26270825 = sum of:
    0.20100981 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20100981 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.06169843 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06169843 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  15. Rothstein on reference : ... with some help from friends (1990) 0.10 
    0.1046224 = product of:
  0.523112 = sum of:
    0.523112 = weight(_text_:friends in 265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.523112 = score(doc=265,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43875828 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        1.1922555 = fieldWeight in 265, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7079034 = idf(docFreq=53, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=265)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  16. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.10 
    0.101916924 = product of:
  0.2547923 = sum of:
    0.17766926 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17766926 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.07712304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07712304 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  17. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.09 
    0.09488072 = product of:
  0.2372018 = sum of:
    0.19864027 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19864027 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.03856152 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03856152 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  18. Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999) 0.09 
    0.09236526 = product of:
  0.23091313 = sum of:
    0.18463932 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18463932 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.04627382 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04627382 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
    Date
    21.10.2000 15:01:22
  19. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.09 
    0.09194789 = product of:
  0.22986972 = sum of:
    0.17588359 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17588359 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.053986125 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053986125 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  20. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.09 
    0.09194789 = product of:
  0.22986972 = sum of:
    0.17588359 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17588359 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3025507 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.053986125 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053986125 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19933525 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05692317 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3537
  • m 391
  • el 219
  • s 167
  • x 40
  • b 39
  • i 24
  • r 22
  • ? 8
  • n 4
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications