Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.015303287 = product of:
  0.076516435 = sum of:
    0.076516435 = weight(_text_:objects in 2785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.076516435 = score(doc=2785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 2785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2785)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

"Big Data" is on the covers of Science, Nature, the Economist, and Wired magazines, on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. But despite the media hyperbole, as Christine Borgman points out in this examination of data and scholarly research, having the right data is usually better than having more data; little data can be just as valuable as big data. In many cases, there are no data -- because relevant data don't exist, cannot be found, or are not available. Moreover, data sharing is difficult, incentives to do so are minimal, and data practices vary widely across disciplines. Borgman, an often-cited authority on scholarly communication, argues that data have no value or meaning in isolation; they exist within a knowledge infrastructure -- an ecology of people, practices, technologies, institutions, material objects, and relationships. After laying out the premises of her investigation -- six "provocations" meant to inspire discussion about the uses of data in scholarship -- Borgman offers case studies of data practices in the sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities, and then considers the implications of her findings for scholarly practice and research policy. To manage and exploit data over the long term, Borgman argues, requires massive investment in knowledge infrastructures; at stake is the future of scholarship.

0.013285765 = product of:
  0.066428825 = sum of:
    0.066428825 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066428825 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 1.2017 17:12:50

0.013041425 = product of:
  0.065207124 = sum of:
    0.065207124 = weight(_text_:cd in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.065207124 = score(doc=1633,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25286767 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.25787055 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Betrachtet wird der europäische Entwurf der Informationsgesellschaft in der Folge des EG-Weißbuches von 1993 und der Tagung in Korfu (1994). Es zeigt sich die zentrale Rolle des Informationsengineering. Hier geht es um die Produktion, Speicherung, Verteilung und Abfrage von Informationen. Wirtschaftliche Kennziffern beleuchten den deutschen Informationsmarkt (Online-Datenbanken, CD-ROM, Videotex, professionelle Informationsvermittlung). Die Relevanz elektronischer Informationsdienste für die betriebswirtschaftliche Praxis (Branchen- und Konkurrenzanalysen, Benchmarking) wird anhand von konkreten Beispielrecherchen demonstriert. Elektronische Datenbanken gestatten, die wissenschaftliche Forschung im Rahmen der Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Publikations- Zitations- oder Themenanalysen zu beschreiben und zu bewerten. Ein Kapitel beschreibt detailliert diejenigen Tätigkeiten, die beim Auf- und Ausbau elektronischer Informationsdienste routinemäßig durchgeführt werden, mit dem Ziel, Qualitätsmerkmale für die Informationstätigkeit abzuleiten. Die Komplexität der Informationstätigkeiten führt u.a. in Bereiche der fuzzy logic und der Informationshermeneutik. Abgeschlossen wird das Buch mit einer 'Anatomie' einer konkreten Datenbank. Beispiel ist die ifo Literaturdatenbank, die erfolgreich bei mehreren Hosts als Online-Datenbank sowie zusätzlich als CD-ROM Datenbank vermarktet wird

0.011477466 = product of:
  0.057387326 = sum of:
    0.057387326 = weight(_text_:objects in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057387326 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32574716 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.17617138 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This book provides a practical introduction to metadata for the digital library, describing in detail how to implement a strategic approach which will enable complex digital objects to be discovered, delivered and preserved in the short- and long-term.

0.008303604 = product of:
  0.041518018 = sum of:
    0.041518018 = weight(_text_:22 in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041518018 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

22. 3.2008 12:26:32

0.004982162 = product of:
  0.02491081 = sum of:
    0.02491081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02491081 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2146182 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.06128745 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

27.12.2008 11:22:36