-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.34
0.34205472 = sum of:
0.07907753 = product of:
0.23723257 = sum of:
0.23723257 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23723257 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.23723257 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23723257 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.025744604 = product of:
0.051489208 = sum of:
0.051489208 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051489208 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.29
0.28503957 = sum of:
0.06390429 = product of:
0.19171287 = sum of:
0.19171287 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19171287 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19171287 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19171287 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.029422404 = product of:
0.05884481 = sum of:
0.05884481 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05884481 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998)
0.29
0.28503957 = sum of:
0.06390429 = product of:
0.19171287 = sum of:
0.19171287 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19171287 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19171287 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19171287 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.029422404 = product of:
0.05884481 = sum of:
0.05884481 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05884481 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009)
0.27
0.27099293 = sum of:
0.06315098 = product of:
0.18945293 = sum of:
0.18945293 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18945293 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18945293 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18945293 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.018389003 = product of:
0.036778007 = sum of:
0.036778007 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036778007 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:52:32
-
Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016)
0.26
0.26271382 = sum of:
0.05648395 = product of:
0.16945185 = sum of:
0.16945185 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16945185 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16945185 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16945185 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.036778007 = product of:
0.07355601 = sum of:
0.07355601 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07355601 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Chang, C.-C.; Wu, T.-C.: Retrieving the most similar symbolic pictures from pictorial databases (1992)
0.26
0.2608882 = product of:
0.39133227 = sum of:
0.09783307 = product of:
0.2934992 = sum of:
0.2934992 = weight(_text_:objects in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2934992 = score(doc=3072,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
1.017126 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2934992 = weight(_text_:objects in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2934992 = score(doc=3072,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
1.017126 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, an iconic indexing mechanism is suggested for spatial similarity retrieval on iconic image databases based upon the spatial relationships among the objects in a picture. The iconic objects dealt with were some kinds of gross panorama of simple objects
-
Falquet, G.; Guyot, J.; Nerima, L.: Languages and tools to specify hypertext views on databases (1999)
0.26
0.2568662 = sum of:
0.058699846 = product of:
0.17609954 = sum of:
0.17609954 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17609954 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17609954 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17609954 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
0.022066802 = product of:
0.044133604 = sum of:
0.044133604 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044133604 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models
- Date
- 21.10.2000 15:01:22
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.25
0.24940963 = sum of:
0.055916257 = product of:
0.16774876 = sum of:
0.16774876 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16774876 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16774876 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16774876 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.025744604 = product of:
0.051489208 = sum of:
0.051489208 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051489208 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.25
0.24940963 = sum of:
0.055916257 = product of:
0.16774876 = sum of:
0.16774876 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16774876 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16774876 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16774876 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.025744604 = product of:
0.051489208 = sum of:
0.051489208 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051489208 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
-
Mervis, C.B.; Rosch, E.: Categorization of natural objects (1981)
0.24
0.24099818 = product of:
0.36149725 = sum of:
0.09037431 = product of:
0.27112293 = sum of:
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 2913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=2913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 2913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2913)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Couprie, L.D.: ICONCLASS: a device for the iconographical analysis of art objects (1978)
0.24
0.24099818 = product of:
0.36149725 = sum of:
0.09037431 = product of:
0.27112293 = sum of:
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Will, L.: ¬The indexing of museum objects (1993)
0.24
0.24099818 = product of:
0.36149725 = sum of:
0.09037431 = product of:
0.27112293 = sum of:
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=6101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 6101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=6101,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 6101, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6101)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Will, L.: Museum objects as sources of information (1994)
0.24
0.24099818 = product of:
0.36149725 = sum of:
0.09037431 = product of:
0.27112293 = sum of:
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 8294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=8294,freq=8.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 8294, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8294)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 8294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=8294,freq=8.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 8294, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8294)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Museums like libraries, have 2 missions: they preserve objects for the future and they make them available for use today. If objects are intended for use, museum must decide how this can best be achieved; by displaying and interpreting them in exhibitions, and by providing documentary and physical access to objects in store. Discusses these options focusing on the development of museum information centres and of museum catalogues. Describes the structure of the catalogue, name and subject access and the choice between singular forms for indexing, free text indexing, and classification into related groups
-
Treu, S.: Conceptual distance and interface-supported visualization of information objects and patterns (1990)
0.24
0.24099818 = product of:
0.36149725 = sum of:
0.09037431 = product of:
0.27112293 = sum of:
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 5307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=5307,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 5307, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5307)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 5307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=5307,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 5307, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5307)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Furnas, G.W.; Landauer, T.K.: Describing categories of objects for menu retrieval systems (1984)
0.24
0.24099818 = product of:
0.36149725 = sum of:
0.09037431 = product of:
0.27112293 = sum of:
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 6507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=6507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 6507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6507)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27112293 = weight(_text_:objects in 6507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27112293 = score(doc=6507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 6507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6507)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Hajibayova, L.; Latham, K.F.: Exploring museum crowdsourcing projects through Bordieu's lens (2017)
0.24
0.239108 = product of:
0.35866198 = sum of:
0.089665495 = product of:
0.26899648 = sum of:
0.26899648 = weight(_text_:objects in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26899648 = score(doc=4129,freq=14.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9322114 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26899648 = weight(_text_:objects in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26899648 = score(doc=4129,freq=14.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.9322114 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Museum crowdsourcing projects have drastically changed the ways in which individuals engage with cultural objects. In particular, individuals' participation in representation of cultural objects through creating, sharing, and curating museum cultural objects contributes to the creation of multifaceted and rich representation of cultural objects as well as transgression of institutional boundaries between cultural heritage institutions. Applying Bourdieu's (2010) conceptualization of cultural capital to museum crowdsourcing initiatives, this study suggests that cultural objects should be considered not only in relation to other objects, but also in relation to the social structure of the world and suggests that successful engagement with the crowd is grounded on an understanding of engaged individuals' cultural capital and habitus. This approach will facilitate creation of not only multifaceted and multivalent representation of cultural objects but also ensure sustainable and meaningful engagement of individuals.
-
Larsen, B.; Ingwersen, P.; Lund, B.: Data fusion according to the principle of polyrepresentation (2009)
0.23
0.22634469 = product of:
0.67903405 = sum of:
0.67903405 = sum of:
0.64961165 = weight(_text_:fusions in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.64961165 = score(doc=2752,freq=10.0), product of:
0.59739757 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
1.0874026 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
0.029422404 = weight(_text_:22 in 2752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029422404 = score(doc=2752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2752)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- We report data fusion experiments carried out on the four best-performing retrieval models from TREC 5. Three were conceptually/algorithmically very different from one another; one was algorithmically similar to one of the former. The objective of the test was to observe the performance of the 11 logical data fusion combinations compared to the performance of the four individual models and their intermediate fusions when following the principle of polyrepresentation. This principle is based on cognitive IR perspective (Ingwersen & Järvelin, 2005) and implies that each retrieval model is regarded as a representation of a unique interpretation of information retrieval (IR). It predicts that only fusions of very different, but equally good, IR models may outperform each constituent as well as their intermediate fusions. Two kinds of experiments were carried out. One tested restricted fusions, which entails that only the inner disjoint overlap documents between fused models are ranked. The second set of experiments was based on traditional data fusion methods. The experiments involved the 30 TREC 5 topics that contain more than 44 relevant documents. In all tests, the Borda and CombSUM scoring methods were used. Performance was measured by precision and recall, with document cutoff values (DCVs) at 100 and 15 documents, respectively. Results show that restricted fusions made of two, three, or four cognitively/algorithmically very different retrieval models perform significantly better than do the individual models at DCV100. At DCV15, however, the results of polyrepresentative fusion were less predictable. The traditional fusion method based on polyrepresentation principles demonstrates a clear picture of performance at both DCV levels and verifies the polyrepresentation predictions for data fusion in IR. Data fusion improves retrieval performance over their constituent IR models only if the models all are quite conceptually/algorithmically dissimilar and equally and well performing, in that order of importance.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:48:28
-
Galloway, P.: Preservation of digital objects (2003)
0.23
0.22593579 = product of:
0.33890367 = sum of:
0.08472592 = product of:
0.25417775 = sum of:
0.25417775 = weight(_text_:objects in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25417775 = score(doc=4275,freq=18.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.8808569 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25417775 = weight(_text_:objects in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25417775 = score(doc=4275,freq=18.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.8808569 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The preservation of digital objects (defined here as objects in digital form that require a computer to support their existence and display) is obviously an important practical issue for the information professions, with its importance growing daily as more information objects are produced in, or converted to, digital form. Yakel's (2001) review of the field provided a much-needed introduction. At the same time, the complexity of new digital objects continues to increase, challenging existing preservation efforts (Lee, Skattery, Lu, Tang, & McCrary, 2002). The field of information science itself is beginning to pay some reflexive attention to the creation of fragile and unpreservable digital objects. But these concerns focus often an the practical problems of short-term repurposing of digital objects rather than actual preservation, by which I mean the activity of carrying digital objects from one software generation to another, undertaken for purposes beyond the original reasons for creating the objects. For preservation in this sense to be possible, information science as a discipline needs to be active in the formulation of, and advocacy for, national information policies. Such policies will need to challenge the predominant cultural expectation of planned obsolescence for information resources, and cultural artifacts in general.
-
Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997)
0.22
0.22292006 = sum of:
0.04792822 = product of:
0.14378466 = sum of:
0.14378466 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14378466 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14378466 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14378466 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.031207174 = product of:
0.062414348 = sum of:
0.062414348 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062414348 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19011576 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
3. 1.1999 12:21:22
-
Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Automatic image indexation to support content-based retrieval (1992)
0.22
0.22137097 = product of:
0.33205643 = sum of:
0.08301411 = product of:
0.24904232 = sum of:
0.24904232 = weight(_text_:objects in 3032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24904232 = score(doc=3032,freq=12.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.86305994 = fieldWeight in 3032, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3032)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.24904232 = weight(_text_:objects in 3032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24904232 = score(doc=3032,freq=12.0), product of:
0.28855738 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.05429041 = queryNorm
0.86305994 = fieldWeight in 3032, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3032)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The article presents a new approach for the automatic interpretation of the content of graphical and pictorial images and the creation of access structures based on this analysis. The automatic indexation of images is necessary to support the access to a database of images, giving conditions of the semantic image content. The key aspect of the image analysis process is on the composition of objects, in terms of other objects, taking into account different interpretations and different levels of recognition. The image analysis process can be applied to images belonging to specific domains, described in advance to the system. Image analysis is performed in two steps: in the first step, simple objects are recognized starting from basic graphical/pictorial elements; in the second step, complex objects are recognized (applying domain rules) as compositions of simpler objects and different interpretations are generated. The image query language allows the user to express conditions on the objects to be found in the images, on their relative positions, on their interpretation and degree of recognition. A comprehensive example, based on 2D graphical images, is discussed, and the implemented prototype is described.
