Search (9053 results, page 1 of 453)

  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.27
    0.2734861 = product of:
      0.6837153 = sum of:
        0.254682 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.254682 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.54378754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.42903328 = weight(_text_:2fda3 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42903328 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.70579016 = queryWeight, product of:
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.60787654 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  2. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.23
    0.23327193 = product of:
      0.38878652 = sum of:
        0.1000987 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1000987 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.254682 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.254682 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.54378754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.034005832 = weight(_text_:21 in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034005832 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Date
    29.12.2020 13:02:21
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  3. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.20
    0.19928335 = product of:
      0.3321389 = sum of:
        0.254682 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.254682 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.54378754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.034005832 = weight(_text_:21 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034005832 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.043451056 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043451056 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  4. Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997) 0.17
    0.1706514 = product of:
      0.284419 = sum of:
        0.16987312 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16987312 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.040806998 = weight(_text_:21 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040806998 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
        0.07373889 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07373889 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    3. 1.1999 12:21:22
  5. Winterhager, M.: Towards bibliometric objects : a relational view to ISI's Science Citation Index (1992) 0.15
    0.15019707 = product of:
      0.37549266 = sum of:
        0.28027633 = weight(_text_:objects in 8855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28027633 = score(doc=8855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 8855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8855)
        0.09521633 = weight(_text_:21 in 8855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09521633 = score(doc=8855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 8855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8855)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Pages
    S.21-34
  6. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.15
    0.14914669 = product of:
      0.2485778 = sum of:
        0.14013816 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14013816 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
        0.047608163 = weight(_text_:21 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047608163 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
        0.060831472 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060831472 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
    Source
    Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.11-14
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.14
    0.14310387 = product of:
      0.35775965 = sum of:
        0.3056184 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3056184 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.54378754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.052141264 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052141264 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  8. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.14
    0.13857017 = product of:
      0.3464254 = sum of:
        0.3056184 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3056184 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.54378754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.040806998 = weight(_text_:21 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040806998 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  9. Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019) 0.14
    0.13644312 = product of:
      0.3411078 = sum of:
        0.28027633 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28027633 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
        0.060831472 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060831472 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
    Date
    21.11.2019 18:46:22
  10. Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996) 0.13
    0.12784003 = product of:
      0.2130667 = sum of:
        0.12011843 = weight(_text_:objects in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12011843 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.040806998 = weight(_text_:21 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040806998 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
        0.052141264 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052141264 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  11. Li, X.: Designing an interactive Web tutorial with cross-browser dynamic HTML (2000) 0.13
    0.12784003 = product of:
      0.2130667 = sum of:
        0.12011843 = weight(_text_:objects in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12011843 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
        0.040806998 = weight(_text_:21 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040806998 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
        0.052141264 = weight(_text_:22 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052141264 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Texas A&M University Libraries developed a Web-based training (WBT) application for LandView III, a federal depository CD-ROM publication using cross-browser dynamic HTML (DHTML) and other Web technologies. The interactive and self-paced tutorial demonstrates the major features of the CD-ROM and shows how to navigate the programs. The tutorial features dynamic HTML techniques, such as hiding, showing and moving layers; dragging objects; and windows-style drop-down menus. It also integrates interactive forms, common gateway interface (CGI), frames, and animated GIF images in the design of the WBT. After describing the design and implementation of the tutorial project, an evaluation of usage statistics and user feedback was conducted, as well as an assessment of its strengths and weaknesses, and a comparison of this tutorial with other common types of training methods. The present article describes an innovative approach for CD-ROM training using advanced Web technologies such as dynamic HTML, which can simulate and demonstrate the interactive use of the CD-ROM, as well as the actual search process of a database.
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:21:22
  12. DiMarco, J.: Examining Bloom's Taxonomy and Peschl's Modes of Knowing for Classification of Learning Objects on the PBS.org/teachersource Website (2008) 0.13
    0.12685108 = product of:
      0.3171277 = sum of:
        0.28312188 = weight(_text_:objects in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28312188 = score(doc=2496,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.83047986 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
        0.034005832 = weight(_text_:21 in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034005832 = score(doc=2496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    The delivery of learning objects, small chunks of stand alone core components of reusable instruction (Nugent 2005) are used extensively in k-12 environments. Learning objects are videos and animated clips which are deployed in classrooms through public television companion websites. One such site is PBS. org/teachersource. Scholars and institutional reports (Schaffer & Douglas 2004, Nugent 2005, and PBS 2003) have identified challenges with learning objects lacking reliable pedagogical and curricular context due to the need for interpretation of raw materials by teachers and students (Nugent 2005). Technical challenges in learning objects include pedagogy and context relationships, issues with metadata in digital portals, and digital rights to content. This is a study of metadata representations of learning objects. The goal of this study was to propose and apply a comparative taxonomy to classify learning objects based on Bloom's Taxonomy in 2006 and Peschl's modes of knowing in 2007, thus adding to the discourse on taxonomies present in learning object repositories and knowledge-oriented educational processes existing in public broadcasting and educational new media content domains. In an effort to re-examine the data and conclusions, I matched Bloom's model against modes of knowing keywords put forth by Peschl (2006). Matching the Peschl model against the Bloom model provided a new template to use in determining the cognitive level of learning objectives embedded in PBS TeacherSource website learning objects.
    Pages
    S.15-21
  13. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.12
    0.12393103 = product of:
      0.30982757 = sum of:
        0.13602333 = weight(_text_:21 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13602333 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.6845522 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
        0.17380422 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17380422 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  14. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.12
    0.12224736 = product of:
      0.6112368 = sum of:
        0.6112368 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.6112368 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.54378754 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  15. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.12
    0.11840768 = product of:
      0.2960192 = sum of:
        0.2264975 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2264975 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
        0.06952169 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06952169 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  16. Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998) 0.12
    0.11840768 = product of:
      0.2960192 = sum of:
        0.2264975 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2264975 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
        0.06952169 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06952169 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  17. Terry, J.L.: Automated library systems : a history of constraints and opportunities (1998) 0.12
    0.117174484 = product of:
      0.2929362 = sum of:
        0.15389283 = weight(_text_:21 in 4700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15389283 = score(doc=4700,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.7744824 = fieldWeight in 4700, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4700)
        0.13904338 = weight(_text_:22 in 4700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13904338 = score(doc=4700,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4700, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4700)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2000 12:40:23
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.21-37
  18. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.11
    0.11483981 = product of:
      0.2870995 = sum of:
        0.2001974 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2001974 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
        0.08690211 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08690211 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  19. Artz, J.M.: ¬A crash course in metaphysics for the database designer (1997) 0.11
    0.10728363 = product of:
      0.26820907 = sum of:
        0.2001974 = weight(_text_:objects in 1898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2001974 = score(doc=1898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 1898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1898)
        0.068011664 = weight(_text_:21 in 1898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068011664 = score(doc=1898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1987041 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.3422761 = fieldWeight in 1898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1898)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a crash course in metaphysics for database designers and show how the problem of universals is central to good database design as it affects the identification of the proper set of objects to be included in the information modelling
    Date
    13. 8.1998 18:21:44
  20. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.11
    0.10691142 = product of:
      0.26727855 = sum of:
        0.22382751 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22382751 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.3409136 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
        0.043451056 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043451056 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22461061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.06414093 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications