-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.92
0.921278 = sum of:
0.89615536 = product of:
1.344233 = sum of:
0.500723 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.500723 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4454688 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.8435101 = weight(_text_:2fdoc in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.8435101 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5781808 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.025122626 = product of:
0.075367875 = sum of:
0.075367875 = weight(_text_:12 in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075367875 = score(doc=973,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.5185995 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
- Date
- 12. 9.2023 19:15:48
12. 9.2023 19:25:17
-
Comaroni, J.P.: Use of the Dewey Decimal Classification in the United States and Canada (1978)
0.18
0.18062684 = product of:
0.36125368 = sum of:
0.36125368 = product of:
0.5418805 = sum of:
0.49204755 = weight(_text_:abridges in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.49204755 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5781808 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.85102713 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.04983293 = weight(_text_:22 in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04983293 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A summary of a survey of the use of the DDC in libraries of the United States and Canada is presented. (5% of alle libraries in the United States and Canada use DDC; of these are at least 75% use the most recent full or abridges edition. Librarians wish to have DDC revised continuously, but they do not want the meanings of numbers changed. Any assistance that can be provided in the application of DDC is welcome. Most of the larger libraries do not believe zhat the current index provides sufficient assistance. Divisions needing revision are listed with an index number reflecting priority. DDC is seen to be warmly regarded by librarians in general and by public service librarians in particular
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 22(1978), S.402-408
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.12
0.12350243 = sum of:
0.06184865 = product of:
0.18554595 = sum of:
0.18554595 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18554595 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.061653785 = product of:
0.092480674 = sum of:
0.035528753 = weight(_text_:12 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035528753 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.05695192 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05695192 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Date
- 8.10.2004 12:19:07
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff)
0.11
0.10807848 = sum of:
0.06954487 = product of:
0.2086346 = sum of:
0.2086346 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2086346 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4454688 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.038533617 = product of:
0.057800423 = sum of:
0.022205472 = weight(_text_:12 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022205472 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.03559495 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03559495 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- 1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
-
#2434
0.11
0.10789412 = product of:
0.21578825 = sum of:
0.21578825 = product of:
0.32368237 = sum of:
0.12435064 = weight(_text_:12 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12435064 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.8556455 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.19933172 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19933172 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 9.2011 12:28:22
-
Forsyth, D.A.: Finding pictures of objects in large collections of images (1997)
0.10
0.10442196 = sum of:
0.046386488 = product of:
0.13915946 = sum of:
0.13915946 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13915946 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.05803547 = product of:
0.0870532 = sum of:
0.026646566 = weight(_text_:12 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026646566 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.060406636 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060406636 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
3. 1.1999 12:21:22
-
Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016)
0.10
0.09998507 = sum of:
0.046386488 = product of:
0.13915946 = sum of:
0.13915946 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13915946 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.053598583 = product of:
0.080397874 = sum of:
0.037683938 = weight(_text_:12 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037683938 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.25929976 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.04271394 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04271394 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
- Date
- 12. 3.2016 14:00:12
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.10
0.09769181 = sum of:
0.083453834 = product of:
0.2503615 = sum of:
0.2503615 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2503615 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4454688 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01423798 = product of:
0.04271394 = sum of:
0.04271394 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04271394 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.10
0.09687837 = product of:
0.19375674 = sum of:
0.19375674 = product of:
0.2906351 = sum of:
0.0820005 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0820005 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.2086346 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2086346 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4454688 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.09
0.093144774 = sum of:
0.076533794 = product of:
0.22960138 = sum of:
0.22960138 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22960138 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.016610976 = product of:
0.04983293 = sum of:
0.04983293 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04983293 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.09
0.092626825 = sum of:
0.046386488 = product of:
0.13915946 = sum of:
0.13915946 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13915946 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.04624034 = product of:
0.06936051 = sum of:
0.026646566 = weight(_text_:12 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026646566 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.04271394 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04271394 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Date
- 8.10.2004 12:19:07
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Álvarez, E. Corera- -> Corera-Álvarez, E.:
0.09
0.09248068 = product of:
0.18496136 = sum of:
0.18496136 = product of:
0.27744204 = sum of:
0.10658626 = weight(_text_:12 in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10658626 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.7334104 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
0.17085576 = weight(_text_:22 in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17085576 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 2.2008 12:22:10
-
Lubas, R.L.; Wolfe, R.H.W.; Fleischman, M.: Creating metadata practices for MIT's OpenCourseWare Project (2004)
0.09
0.09221396 = sum of:
0.038266897 = product of:
0.11480069 = sum of:
0.11480069 = weight(_text_:objects in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11480069 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.05394706 = product of:
0.08092059 = sum of:
0.03108766 = weight(_text_:12 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03108766 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.04983293 = weight(_text_:22 in 2843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04983293 = score(doc=2843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2843)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT's OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the standard's specifications. The newly formed MIT Libraries Metadata Unit adapted established practices from AACR2 and MARC traditions when facing situations in which there were no precedents to follow.
- Date
- 8.10.2004 12:19:07
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.138-143
-
DiMarco, J.: Examining Bloom's Taxonomy and Peschl's Modes of Knowing for Classification of Learning Objects on the PBS.org/teachersource Website (2008)
0.08
0.08471264 = sum of:
0.077310815 = product of:
0.23193243 = sum of:
0.23193243 = weight(_text_:objects in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23193243 = score(doc=2496,freq=16.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.83047986 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.007401824 = product of:
0.022205472 = sum of:
0.022205472 = weight(_text_:12 in 2496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022205472 = score(doc=2496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 2496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2496)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- The delivery of learning objects, small chunks of stand alone core components of reusable instruction (Nugent 2005) are used extensively in k-12 environments. Learning objects are videos and animated clips which are deployed in classrooms through public television companion websites. One such site is PBS. org/teachersource. Scholars and institutional reports (Schaffer & Douglas 2004, Nugent 2005, and PBS 2003) have identified challenges with learning objects lacking reliable pedagogical and curricular context due to the need for interpretation of raw materials by teachers and students (Nugent 2005). Technical challenges in learning objects include pedagogy and context relationships, issues with metadata in digital portals, and digital rights to content. This is a study of metadata representations of learning objects. The goal of this study was to propose and apply a comparative taxonomy to classify learning objects based on Bloom's Taxonomy in 2006 and Peschl's modes of knowing in 2007, thus adding to the discourse on taxonomies present in learning object repositories and knowledge-oriented educational processes existing in public broadcasting and educational new media content domains. In an effort to re-examine the data and conclusions, I matched Bloom's model against modes of knowing keywords put forth by Peschl (2006). Matching the Peschl model against the Bloom model provided a new template to use in determining the cognitive level of learning objectives embedded in PBS TeacherSource website learning objects.
-
Aker, A.; Plaza, L.; Lloret, E.; Gaizauskas, R.: Do humans have conceptual models about geographic objects? : a user study (2013)
0.08
0.08471264 = sum of:
0.077310815 = product of:
0.23193243 = sum of:
0.23193243 = weight(_text_:objects in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23193243 = score(doc=680,freq=16.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.83047986 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.007401824 = product of:
0.022205472 = sum of:
0.022205472 = weight(_text_:12 in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022205472 = score(doc=680,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.15279384 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, we investigate what sorts of information humans request about geographical objects of the same type. For example, Edinburgh Castle and Bodiam Castle are two objects of the same type: "castle." The question is whether specific information is requested for the object type "castle" and how this information differs for objects of other types (e.g., church, museum, or lake). We aim to answer this question using an online survey. In the survey, we showed 184 participants 200 images pertaining to urban and rural objects and asked them to write questions for which they would like to know the answers when seeing those objects. Our analysis of the 6,169 questions collected in the survey shows that humans have shared ideas of what to ask about geographical objects. When the object types resemble each other (e.g., church and temple), the requested information is similar for the objects of these types. Otherwise, the information is specific to an object type. Our results may be very useful in guiding Natural Language Processing tasks involving automatic generation of templates for image descriptions and their assessment, as well as image indexing and organization.
- Date
- 23. 3.2013 12:32:04
-
Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005)
0.08
0.08222567 = sum of:
0.073343486 = product of:
0.22003044 = sum of:
0.22003044 = weight(_text_:objects in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22003044 = score(doc=5727,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008882189 = product of:
0.026646566 = sum of:
0.026646566 = weight(_text_:12 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026646566 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
- Date
- 5. 6.2001 12:25:05
-
Huvila, I.: ¬The politics of boundary objects : hegemonic interventions and the making of a document (2011)
0.08
0.08222567 = sum of:
0.073343486 = product of:
0.22003044 = sum of:
0.22003044 = weight(_text_:objects in 4936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22003044 = score(doc=4936,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.7878624 = fieldWeight in 4936, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4936)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008882189 = product of:
0.026646566 = sum of:
0.026646566 = weight(_text_:12 in 4936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026646566 = score(doc=4936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 4936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4936)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Boundary objects are artifacts that reside in the interface between communities and are capable of bridging assumed and experienced differences. Bridging is not, however, necessarily a neutral or a consensual activity. With an emphasis on documents, the present article discusses the politics of boundary objects by analyzing the role of archaeological reports at boundaries between communities with conflicting interests. The analysis demonstrates and discusses the political and purposeful nature of boundary objects-how they are devices for creating and maintaining hegemonies within communities and achieving authority over other intersecting groups of people. The study uses the notion of hegemony and the discourse theory of Laclau and Mouffe (2001) to conceptualize the role of boundary objects as articulations of power and to explicate the dynamics of how the power is exercised.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2528-2539
-
Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998)
0.08
0.08083263 = sum of:
0.06184865 = product of:
0.18554595 = sum of:
0.18554595 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18554595 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018983975 = product of:
0.05695192 = sum of:
0.05695192 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05695192 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996)
0.08
0.07904054 = sum of:
0.032800198 = product of:
0.09840059 = sum of:
0.09840059 = weight(_text_:objects in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09840059 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.04624034 = product of:
0.06936051 = sum of:
0.026646566 = weight(_text_:12 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026646566 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
0.04271394 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04271394 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
- Date
- 12. 8.2002 13:14:08
- Source
- Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
-
Winget, M.A.: Annotations on musical scores by performing musicians : collaborative models, interactive methods, and music digital library tool development (2008)
0.08
0.07904054 = sum of:
0.032800198 = product of:
0.09840059 = sum of:
0.09840059 = weight(_text_:objects in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09840059 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2792752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.04624034 = product of:
0.06936051 = sum of:
0.026646566 = weight(_text_:12 in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026646566 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14532962 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
0.04271394 = weight(_text_:22 in 2368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04271394 = score(doc=2368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18400022 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052544024 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2368)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Although there have been a number of fairly recent studies in which researchers have explored the information-seeking and management behaviors of people interacting with musical retrieval systems, there have been very few published studies of the interaction and use behaviors of musicians interacting with their primary information object, the musical score. The ethnographic research reported here seeks to correct this deficiency in the literature. In addition to observing rehearsals and conducting 22 in-depth musician interviews, this research provides in-depth analysis of 25,000 annotations representing 250 parts from 13 complete musical works, made by musicians of all skill levels and performance modes. In addition to producing specific and practical recommendations for digital-library development, this research also provides an augmented annotation framework that will enable more specific study of human-information interaction, both with musical scores, and with more general notational/instructional information objects.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1878-1897
