-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.66
0.6612305 = product of:
1.6530763 = sum of:
0.6157663 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.6157663 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5478172 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
1.03731 = weight(_text_:2fdoc in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
1.03731 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.71102023 = queryWeight, product of:
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
1.4589037 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.24
0.2381795 = product of:
0.39696583 = sum of:
0.30788314 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30788314 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5478172 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.03655505 = weight(_text_:1 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03655505 = score(doc=562,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.23029712 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.052527644 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052527644 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
- Source
- Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
-
Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff)
0.20
0.20259072 = product of:
0.3376512 = sum of:
0.2565693 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2565693 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5478172 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.037308846 = weight(_text_:1 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037308846 = score(doc=3577,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.23504603 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.04377304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04377304 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Content
- 1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.20
0.19960634 = product of:
0.33267722 = sum of:
0.22817592 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22817592 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.034464434 = weight(_text_:1 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034464434 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.07003686 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07003686 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.19
0.19274937 = product of:
0.32124892 = sum of:
0.19965392 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19965392 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.060312755 = weight(_text_:1 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060312755 = score(doc=735,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.37997085 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.06128225 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06128225 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28
-
Chowdhury, G.G.; Neelameghan, A.; Chowdhury, S.: VOCON: Vocabulary control online in MicroIsis databases (1995)
0.15
0.15479954 = product of:
0.2579992 = sum of:
0.14117664 = weight(_text_:objects in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14117664 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.030156378 = weight(_text_:1 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030156378 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.0866662 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0866662 = score(doc=1087,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Discusses the need for facilities for online vocabulary control and standardization of terms, codes, etc., so as to secure consistency in naming of subjects, objects, countries, languages, etc., in databases at data entry stage. Most information storage and retrieval packages for microcomputers including MicroIsis provide for online vocabulary control in formulating search expressions for information retrieval, but not at the data entry stage. VOCON.PAS is a Pascal interface program for use with MicroIsis software for (a) online selection of term(s) and/or code(s) from vocabulary control tool, such as, thesaurus, subject heading list, classification scheme, nomenclature list(s)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.18-22
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The limits of Web metadata, and beyond (1998)
0.15
0.15281478 = product of:
0.25469127 = sum of:
0.14117664 = weight(_text_:objects in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14117664 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.05223239 = weight(_text_:1 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05223239 = score(doc=3383,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.32906446 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.06128225 = weight(_text_:22 in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06128225 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Highlights 2 major problems of the WWW metadata: it will take some time before a reasonable number of people start using metadata to provide a better Web classification, and that no one can guarantee that a majority of the Web objects will be ever properly classified via metadata. Addresses the problem of how to cope with intrinsic limits of Web metadata, proposes a method to solve these problems and show evidence of its effectiveness. Examines the important problem of what is the required critical mass in the WWW for metadata in order for it to be really useful
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 30(1998) nos.1/7, S.1-9
-
Yee, R.; Beaubien, R.: ¬A preliminary crosswalk from METS to IMS content packaging (2004)
0.15
0.14970475 = product of:
0.2495079 = sum of:
0.17113194 = weight(_text_:objects in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17113194 = score(doc=4752,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.025848325 = weight(_text_:1 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025848325 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.052527644 = weight(_text_:22 in 4752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052527644 = score(doc=4752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4752)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- As educational technology becomes pervasive, demand will grow for library content to be incorporated into courseware. Among the barriers impeding interoperability between libraries and educational tools is the difference in specifications commonly used for the exchange of digital objects and metadata. Among libraries, Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a new but increasingly popular standard; the IMS content-package (IMS-CP) plays a parallel role in educational technology. This article describes how METS-encoded library content can be converted into digital objects for IMS-compliant systems through an XSLT-based crosswalk. The conceptual models behind METS and IMS-CP are compared, the design and limitations of an XSLT-based translation are described, and the crosswalks are related to other techniques to enhance interoperability.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.69-81
-
Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016)
0.15
0.14970475 = product of:
0.2495079 = sum of:
0.17113194 = weight(_text_:objects in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17113194 = score(doc=2835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.025848325 = weight(_text_:1 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025848325 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.052527644 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052527644 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.1, S.44-55
-
Will, L.: Museum objects as sources of information (1994)
0.15
0.14857182 = product of:
0.37142953 = sum of:
0.32268947 = weight(_text_:objects in 8294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32268947 = score(doc=8294,freq=8.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.9395807 = fieldWeight in 8294, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8294)
0.04874007 = weight(_text_:1 in 8294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04874007 = score(doc=8294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.30706283 = fieldWeight in 8294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8294)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Museums like libraries, have 2 missions: they preserve objects for the future and they make them available for use today. If objects are intended for use, museum must decide how this can best be achieved; by displaying and interpreting them in exhibitions, and by providing documentary and physical access to objects in store. Discusses these options focusing on the development of museum information centres and of museum catalogues. Describes the structure of the catalogue, name and subject access and the choice between singular forms for indexing, free text indexing, and classification into related groups
- Source
- Managing information. 1(1994) no.1, S.32-34
-
Varela, C.A.; Agha, G.A.: What after Java? : From objects to actors (1998)
0.15
0.14706387 = product of:
0.24510644 = sum of:
0.14117664 = weight(_text_:objects in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14117664 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.04264756 = weight(_text_:1 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04264756 = score(doc=3612,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.26867998 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.06128225 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06128225 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 30(1998) nos.1/7, S.573-577
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.14
0.14296392 = product of:
0.35740978 = sum of:
0.100840464 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100840464 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.2565693 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2565693 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5478172 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998)
0.14
0.13956916 = product of:
0.23261526 = sum of:
0.14117664 = weight(_text_:objects in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14117664 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.030156378 = weight(_text_:1 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030156378 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.06128225 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06128225 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
- Date
- 9. 4.2000 17:22:00
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.11-14
-
Perugini, S.: Supporting multiple paths to objects in information hierarchies : faceted classification, faceted search, and symbolic links (2010)
0.14
0.13956916 = product of:
0.23261526 = sum of:
0.14117664 = weight(_text_:objects in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14117664 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.030156378 = weight(_text_:1 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030156378 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.06128225 = weight(_text_:22 in 4227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06128225 = score(doc=4227,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4227, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4227)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 46(2010) no.1, S.22-43
-
Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999)
0.14
0.13956916 = product of:
0.23261526 = sum of:
0.14117664 = weight(_text_:objects in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14117664 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.030156378 = weight(_text_:1 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030156378 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.06128225 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06128225 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:30:31
-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.14
0.13745421 = product of:
0.34363553 = sum of:
0.28235328 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28235328 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.06128225 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06128225 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.13
0.13349259 = product of:
0.33373147 = sum of:
0.30788314 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30788314 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5478172 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.025848325 = weight(_text_:1 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025848325 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
- Pages
- S.1-10
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.13
0.13349259 = product of:
0.33373147 = sum of:
0.30788314 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30788314 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5478172 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.025848325 = weight(_text_:1 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025848325 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 1. 1.2023 17:48:50
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Ku, L.-W.; Ho, H.-W.; Chen, H.-H.: Opinion mining and relationship discovery using CopeOpi opinion analysis system (2009)
0.12
0.12475396 = product of:
0.20792326 = sum of:
0.14260995 = weight(_text_:objects in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14260995 = score(doc=2938,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
0.021540271 = weight(_text_:1 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021540271 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.13570388 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
0.04377304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04377304 = score(doc=2938,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2938, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2938)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- We present CopeOpi, an opinion-analysis system, which extracts from the Web opinions about specific targets, summarizes the polarity and strength of these opinions, and tracks opinion variations over time. Objects that yield similar opinion tendencies over a certain time period may be correlated due to the latent causal events. CopeOpi discovers relationships among objects based on their opinion-tracking plots and collocations. Event bursts are detected from the tracking plots, and the strength of opinion relationships is determined by the coverage of these plots. To evaluate opinion mining, we use the NTCIR corpus annotated with opinion information at sentence and document levels. CopeOpi achieves sentence- and document-level f-measures of 62% and 74%. For relationship discovery, we collected 1.3M economics-related documents from 93 Web sources over 22 months, and analyzed collocation-based, opinion-based, and hybrid models. We consider as correlated company pairs that demonstrate similar stock-price variations, and selected these as the gold standard for evaluation. Results show that opinion-based and collocation-based models complement each other, and that integrated models perform the best. The top 25, 50, and 100 pairs discovered achieve precision rates of 1, 0.92, and 0.79, respectively.
-
Essers, J.; Schreinemakers, J.: ¬The conceptions of knowledge and information in knowledge management (1996)
0.12
0.11963071 = product of:
0.19938451 = sum of:
0.12100855 = weight(_text_:objects in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12100855 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34343988 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
0.025848325 = weight(_text_:1 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025848325 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15872996 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
0.052527644 = weight(_text_:22 in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052527644 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22627504 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.06461623 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The emergence of Knowledge Management (KM) over the last decade has triggered the question how or even whether this new management discipline can be distinguished from the established field of Information Management (IM). In this paper we critically examine this demarcation issue from two angles. First we will investigate to what extent the difference between IM and KM can be anchored an a conceptual distinction between their respective objects: information and knowledge. After having shown that this widely adopted strategy promises little success, we will shift our attention to an examination of the fundamental objectives or guiding principles behind both disciplines. Seen from this angle we argue that KM in order to foster organizational learning, innovation and strategy flexibility, should adopt a postmodern epistemological perspective that is geared to the management of incommensurability and difference within and between organizations.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge management; vol.1
- Source
- Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
