Search (23 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Broughton, V."
  1. Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature of religion (2000) 0.05
    0.048405726 = product of:
      0.25816387 = sum of:
        0.061906047 = weight(_text_:26 in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061906047 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
        0.09812891 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09812891 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6877445 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
        0.09812891 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09812891 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6877445 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Date
    1. 7.1996 21:26:02
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.4, S.59-61
  2. Broughton, V.: Essential Library of Congress Subject Headings (2009) 0.03
    0.030500617 = product of:
      0.16266996 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=395,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
        0.06070152 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06070152 = score(doc=395,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.42543158 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
        0.06070152 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06070152 = score(doc=395,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.42543158 = fieldWeight in 395, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=395)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    LCSH are increasingly seen as 'the' English language controlled vocabulary, despite their lack of a theoretical foundation, and their evident US bias. In mapping exercises between national subject heading lists, and in exercises in digital resource organization and management, LCSH are often chosen because of the lack of any other widely accepted English language standard for subject cataloguing. It is therefore important that the basic nature of LCSH, their advantages, and their limitations, are well understood both by LIS practitioners and those in the wider information community. Information professionals who attended library school before 1995 - and many more recent library school graduates - are unlikely to have had a formal introduction to LCSH. Paraprofessionals who undertake cataloguing are similarly unlikely to have enjoyed an induction to the broad principles of LCSH. There is currently no compact guide to LCSH written from a UK viewpoint, and this eminently practical text fills that gap. It features topics including: background and history of LCSH; subject heading lists; structure and display in LCSH; form of entry; application of LCSH; document analysis; main headings; topical, geographical and free-floating sub-divisions; building compound headings; name headings; headings for literature, art, music, history and law; and, LCSH in the online environment. There is a strong emphasis throughout on worked examples and practical exercises in the application of the scheme, and a full glossary of terms is supplied. No prior knowledge or experience of subject cataloguing is assumed. This is an indispensable guide to LCSH for practitioners and students alike from a well-known and popular author.
  3. Broughton, V.: Essential classification (2004) 0.03
    0.028066728 = product of:
      0.08981353 = sum of:
        0.023344096 = weight(_text_:author in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023344096 = score(doc=2824,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.15077372 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
        0.019825032 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019825032 = score(doc=2824,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.13894537 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
        0.019825032 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019825032 = score(doc=2824,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.13894537 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
        0.022336038 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022336038 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.12401742 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
        0.0044833384 = product of:
          0.008966677 = sum of:
            0.008966677 = weight(_text_:ed in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008966677 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.07857699 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    Classification is a crucial skill for all information workers involved in organizing collections, but it is a difficult concept to grasp - and is even more difficult to put into practice. Essential Classification offers full guidance an how to go about classifying a document from scratch. This much-needed text leads the novice classifier step by step through the basics of subject cataloguing, with an emphasis an practical document analysis and classification. It deals with fundamental questions of the purpose of classification in different situations, and the needs and expectations of end users. The novice is introduced to the ways in which document content can be assessed, and how this can best be expressed for translation into the language of specific indexing and classification systems. The characteristics of the major general schemes of classification are discussed, together with their suitability for different classification needs.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.1, S.47-49 (M. Hudon): "Vanda Broughton's Essential Classification is the most recent addition to a very small set of classification textbooks published over the past few years. The book's 21 chapters are based very closely an the cataloguing and classification module at the School of Library, Archive, and Information studies at University College, London. The author's main objective is clear: this is "first and foremost a book about how to classify. The emphasis throughout is an the activity of classification rather than the theory, the practical problems of the organization of collections, and the needs of the users" (p. 1). This is not a theoretical work, but a basic course in classification and classification scheme application. For this reviewer, who also teaches "Classification 101," this is also a fascinating peek into how a colleague organizes content and structures her course. "Classification is everywhere" (p. 1): the first sentence of this book is also one of the first statements in my own course, and Professor Broughton's metaphors - the supermarket, canned peas, flowers, etc. - are those that are used by our colleagues around the world. The combination of tone, writing style and content display are reader-friendly; they are in fact what make this book remarkable and what distinguishes it from more "formal" textbooks, such as The Organization of Information, the superb text written and recently updated (2004) by Professor Arlene Taylor (2nd ed. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited, 2004). Reading Essential Classification, at times, feels like being in a classroom, facing a teacher who assures you that "you don't need to worry about this at this stage" (p. 104), and reassures you that, although you now speed a long time looking for things, "you will soon speed up when you get to know the scheme better" (p. 137). This teacher uses redundancy in a productive fashion, and she is not afraid to express her own opinions ("I think that if these concepts are helpful they may be used" (p. 245); "It's annoying that LCC doesn't provide clearer instructions, but if you keep your head and take them one step at a time [i.e. the tables] they're fairly straightforward" (p. 174)). Chapters 1 to 7 present the essential theoretical concepts relating to knowledge organization and to bibliographic classification. The author is adept at making and explaining distinctions: known-item retrieval versus subject retrieval, personal versus public/shared/official classification systems, scientific versus folk classification systems, object versus aspect classification systems, semantic versus syntactic relationships, and so on. Chapters 8 and 9 discuss the practice of classification, through content analysis and subject description. A short discussion of difficult subjects, namely the treatment of unique concepts (persons, places, etc.) as subjects seems a little advanced for a beginners' class.
    Essential Classification is also an exercise book. Indeed, it contains a number of practical exercises and activities in every chapter, along with suggested answers. Unfortunately, the answers are too often provided without the justifications and explanations that students would no doubt demand. The author has taken great care to explain all technical terms in her text, but formal definitions are also gathered in an extensive 172-term Glossary; appropriately, these terms appear in bold type the first time they are used in the text. A short, very short, annotated bibliography of standard classification textbooks and of manuals for the use of major classification schemes is provided. A detailed 11-page index completes the set of learning aids which will be useful to an audience of students in their effort to grasp the basic concepts of the theory and the practice of document classification in a traditional environment. Essential Classification is a fine textbook. However, this reviewer deplores the fact that it presents only a very "traditional" view of classification, without much reference to newer environments such as the Internet where classification also manifests itself in various forms. In Essential Classification, books are always used as examples, and we have to take the author's word that traditional classification practices and tools can also be applied to other types of documents and elsewhere than in the traditional library. Vanda Broughton writes, for example, that "Subject headings can't be used for physical arrangement" (p. 101), but this is not entirely true. Subject headings can be used for physical arrangement of vertical files, for example, with each folder bearing a simple or complex heading which is then used for internal organization. And if it is true that subject headings cannot be reproduced an the spine of [physical] books (p. 93), the situation is certainly different an the World Wide Web where subject headings as metadata can be most useful in ordering a collection of hot links. The emphasis is also an the traditional paperbased, rather than an the electronic version of classification schemes, with excellent justifications of course. The reality is, however, that supporting organizations (LC, OCLC, etc.) are now providing great quality services online, and that updates are now available only in an electronic format and not anymore on paper. E-based versions of classification schemes could be safely ignored in a theoretical text, but they have to be described and explained in a textbook published in 2005. One last comment: Professor Broughton tends to use the same term, "classification" to represent the process (as in classification is grouping) and the tool (as in constructing a classification, using a classification, etc.). Even in the Glossary where classification is first well-defined as a process, and classification scheme as "a set of classes ...", the definition of classification scheme continues: "the classification consists of a vocabulary (...) and syntax..." (p. 296-297). Such an ambiguous use of the term classification seems unfortunate and unnecessarily confusing in an otherwise very good basic textbook an categorization of concepts and subjects, document organization and subject representation."
  4. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.02
    0.019984258 = product of:
      0.10658271 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
        0.06700811 = weight(_text_:2nd in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06700811 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.37205225 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
        0.013043438 = product of:
          0.026086876 = sum of:
            0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026086876 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    The ways in which notation can be used to express the content of documents to which it relates are various. At the most superficial level notation can correspond to the hierarchical structure of the schedules or link to literal components. The notation of compound concepts can express the structure and composition of the compound, and systems exist in which symbols denote the functional roles of the constituent elements and the relationships between them. At the highest level notation can be used to mirror the actual structure of those entities which it represents, as in the case of mathematical systems or chemical compounds. Methods of displaying these structures are examined, and the practicality in a documentary context is questioned, with particular reference to recent revision work on the chemistry class of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2)
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.3, S.140-148
  5. Broughton, V.: Essential classification (2015) 0.02
    0.01676211 = product of:
      0.13409688 = sum of:
        0.11168019 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11168019 = score(doc=2098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6200871 = fieldWeight in 2098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2098)
        0.022416692 = product of:
          0.044833384 = sum of:
            0.044833384 = weight(_text_:ed in 2098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044833384 = score(doc=2098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.39288494 = fieldWeight in 2098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Issue
    2nd ed.
  6. Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification Second Edition (2009) 0.01
    0.014338218 = product of:
      0.11470574 = sum of:
        0.08934415 = weight(_text_:2nd in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08934415 = score(doc=3755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49606967 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
        0.025361594 = product of:
          0.050723188 = sum of:
            0.050723188 = weight(_text_:ed in 3755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050723188 = score(doc=3755,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.4444986 = fieldWeight in 3755, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3755)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    This entry looks at the origins of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition and the theory on which it is built. The reasons for the decision to revise the classification are examined, as are the influences on classification theory of the mid-twentieth century. The process of revision and construction of schedules using facet analysis is described. The use of BC2 is considered along with some recent development work on thesaural and digital formats.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  7. Mills, J.; Broughton, V.: Bliss Bibliographic Classification : Introduction and auxiliary schedules (1992) 0.01
    0.013409688 = product of:
      0.107277505 = sum of:
        0.08934415 = weight(_text_:2nd in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08934415 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49606967 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
        0.017933354 = product of:
          0.035866708 = sum of:
            0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866708 = score(doc=821,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 821, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=821)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Issue
    2nd ed.
  8. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.01
    0.0091238795 = product of:
      0.072991036 = sum of:
        0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05777369 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
        0.015217344 = product of:
          0.030434689 = sum of:
            0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030434689 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  9. Broughton, V.: Language related problems in the construction of faceted terminologies and their automatic management (2008) 0.01
    0.008381055 = product of:
      0.06704844 = sum of:
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
        0.011208346 = product of:
          0.022416692 = sum of:
            0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 2497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022416692 = score(doc=2497,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 2497, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2497)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Content
    The paper describes current work on the generation of a thesaurus format from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition (BC2). The practical problems that occur in moving from a concept based approach to a terminological approach cluster around issues of vocabulary control that are not fully addressed in a systematic structure. These difficulties can be exacerbated within domains in the humanities because large numbers of culture specific terms may need to be accommodated in any thesaurus. The ways in which these problems can be resolved within the context of a semi-automated approach to the thesaurus generation have consequences for the management of classification data in the source vocabulary. The way in which the vocabulary is marked up for the purpose of machine manipulation is described, and some of the implications for editorial policy are discussed and examples given. The value of the classification notation as a language independent representation and mapping tool should not be sacrificed in such an exercise.
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  10. Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008) 0.01
    0.0059227357 = product of:
      0.09476377 = sum of:
        0.09476377 = weight(_text_:2nd in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09476377 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5261613 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Facet analysis is an established methodology for building classifications and subject indexing systems, but has been less rigorously applied to thesauri. The process of creating a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification 2nd edition highlights the ways in which the conceptual relationships in a subject field are handled in the two types of retrieval languages. An underlying uniformity of theory is established, and the way in which software can manage the relationships is discussed. The manner of displaying verbal expressions of concepts (vocabulary control) is also considered, but is found to be less well controlled in the classification than in the thesaurus. Nevertheless, there is good reason to think that facet analysis provides a sound basis for structuring a variety of knowledge organization tools.
  11. Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments 0.00
    0.0049976474 = product of:
      0.03998118 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=3532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  12. Broughton, V.: ¬A new common auxiliary table for relations, processes and operations (2002) 0.00
    0.003869128 = product of:
      0.061906047 = sum of:
        0.061906047 = weight(_text_:26 in 3784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061906047 = score(doc=3784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 3784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3784)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    26. 5.1997 20:18:11
  13. Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000) 0.00
    0.0034900059 = product of:
      0.055840094 = sum of:
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=2476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Basic skills of classification and subject indexing have been little taught in British library schools since automation was introduced into libraries. However, development of the Internet as a major medium of publication has stretched the capability of search engines to cope with retrieval. Consequently, there has been interest in applying existing systems of knowledge organization to electronic resources. Unfortunately, the classification systems have been adopted without a full understanding of modern classification principles. Analytico-synthetic schemes have been used crudely, as in the case of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The fully faceted Bliss Bibliographical Classification, 2nd edition (BC2) with its potential as a tool for electronic resource retrieval is virtually unknown outside academic libraries
  14. Broughton, V.: ¬The revision process in UDC : an examination of the systematic auxiliary of 'Point-of-View' using facet-analytical methods (1998) 0.00
    0.0033163952 = product of:
      0.053062323 = sum of:
        0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 6367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053062323 = score(doc=6367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 6367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6367)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    26. 5.1997 20:18:11
  15. Broughton, V.: ¬The development of a common auxiliary schedule of property : a preliminary survey and proposal for its development (1998) 0.00
    0.0033163952 = product of:
      0.053062323 = sum of:
        0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053062323 = score(doc=6410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    26. 5.1997 20:18:11
  16. Broughton, V.: Classification and subject organization and retrieval (2007) 0.00
    0.0019614608 = product of:
      0.031383373 = sum of:
        0.031383373 = product of:
          0.062766746 = sum of:
            0.062766746 = weight(_text_:ed in 6145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062766746 = score(doc=6145,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.55003893 = fieldWeight in 6145, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    British librarianship and information work, 2001-2005. Ed.: J.H. Bowman
  17. Broughton, V.: Classification and subject organization and retrieval (2006) 0.00
    0.0019614608 = product of:
      0.031383373 = sum of:
        0.031383373 = product of:
          0.062766746 = sum of:
            0.062766746 = weight(_text_:ed in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062766746 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.55003893 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    British librarianship and information work, 1991-2000. Ed.: J.H. Bowman
  18. Broughton, V.: Essential thesaurus construction (2006) 0.00
    0.0018060643 = product of:
      0.028897028 = sum of:
        0.028897028 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028897028 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.14106075 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    In einem abschliessenden Kapitel geht das Buch auf Thesauruspflege und -verwaltung ein, wobei auch das Thema "Thesaurussoftware" angerissen wird - letzteres vielleicht ein wenig zu kurz. Erst hier mag manchem unbefangenen Leser bewusst werden, dass die in den vorhergehenden Kapiteln dargestellte Methodik eigentlich ohne den Einsatz dezidierter Software besprochen wurde, ja vielleicht auch so besprochen werden musste, um ein entsprechendes Verständnis herzustellen. In der nachfolgenden zweiseitigen Conclusio wird erwähnt, dass die britische Norm Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval (BS 8723) vor einer Neufassung stehe - was den Rezensenten darauf hinzuweisen gemahnt, dass sich dieses Buch natürlich ausschliesslich auf den anglo-amerikanischen Sprachraum und die dort geltenden Thesaurus-Gepflogenheiten bezieht. Der relativ umfangreiche Anhang beinhaltet ausser Materialie zum erwähnten Demonstrationsbeispiel auch ein nützliches Glossarium sowie ein professionell gefertigtes Sachregister. Literaturhinweise werden - in sparsamer Dosierung - jeweils am Ende der einzelnen Kapitel gegeben, sodass sich die "Bibliography" am Ende des Buches auf einige Normen und zwei Standardwerke beschränken kann. Realistisch betrachtet, darf vermutlich nicht davon ausgegangen werden, dass Leser, die dieses Buch durchgearbeitet haben, sogleich in der Lage sein werden, eigenständig einen Thesaurus zu erstellen. Ein Lehrbuch allein kann weder einen Kurs noch die praktische Erfahrung ersetzen, die für eine solche Tätigkeit vonnöten sind. Ich kann mir aber gut vorstellen, dass die Kenntnis der in diesem Buch vermittelten Inhalte sehr wohl in die Lage versetzt, in einem Team, das einen Thesaurus erstellen soll, kompetent mitzuarbeiten, mit den Konzepten und Fachtermini zurechtzukommen und selbst konstruktive Beiträge zu leisten. Ausserdem erscheint mir das Werk hervorragend als Begleitmaterial zu einer Lehrveranstaltung geeignet - oder auch als Grundlage für die Planung einer solchen. Ein britischer Einführungstext eben, im besten Sinne."
  19. Broughton, V.: Faceted classification in support of diversity : the role of concepts and terms in representing religion (2020) 0.00
    0.0016581976 = product of:
      0.026531162 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 5992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=5992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5992)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    27. 9.2020 20:26:16
  20. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.00
    0.0016304298 = product of:
      0.026086876 = sum of:
        0.026086876 = product of:
          0.052173752 = sum of:
            0.052173752 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052173752 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14