Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hartley, J."
  1. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Structured abstracts in the social sciences : presentation, readability and recall (1995) 0.01 
    0.01011716 = product of:
  0.08093728 = sum of:
    0.026979093 = product of:
      0.053958185 = sum of:
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 2383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053958185 = score(doc=2383,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 2383, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2383)
  0.125 = coord(2/16)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to explore the possibilities of extending the use of structured abstracts (which use subheadings such as background, aims, participants method, results, conclusions) of the type often found in biomedical periodicals; to test whether or not such structured abstracts are more easily searched, comprehended and recalled than abstracts set in the traditional manner; and to examine readers' preferences for different typographic settings for structured abstracts. Results indicated: that it is possible to produce structured abstracts for periodical articles in the social sciences; and that such abstracts may be easier to read, search and recall than abstracts presented in the traditional manner. Suggests that abstracts use 6 subheadings (background, aims, method, results, conclusions, and, optionally, comment) and recommends that these subheadings are conveyed in bold capital letters and, ideally, set apart from the main text by printer's rules
  2. Cabanac, G.; Hubert, G.; Hartley, J.: Solo versus collaborative writing : discrepancies in the use of tables and graphs in academic articles (2014) 0.00 
    0.0030950191 = product of:
  0.049520306 = sum of:
    0.049520306 = weight(_text_:author in 1242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049520306 = score(doc=1242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 1242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1242)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    The number of authors collaborating to write scientific articles has been increasing steadily, and with this collaboration, other factors have also changed, such as the length of articles and the number of citations. However, little is known about potential discrepancies in the use of tables and graphs between single and collaborating authors. In this article, we ask whether multiauthor articles contain more tables and graphs than single-author articles, and we studied 5,180 recent articles published in six science and social sciences journals. We found that pairs and multiple authors used significantly more tables and graphs than single authors. Such findings indicate that there is a greater emphasis on the role of tables and graphs in collaborative writing, and we discuss some of the possible causes and implications of these findings.
  3. Kozak, M.; Iefremova, O.; Hartley, J.: Spamming in scholarly publishing : a case study (2016) 0.00 
    0.0025791824 = product of:
  0.04126692 = sum of:
    0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04126692 = score(doc=3058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Abstract
    Spam has become an issue of concern in almost all areas where the Internet is involved, and many people today have become victims of spam from publishers and individual journals. We studied this phenomenon in the field of scholarly publishing from the perspective of a single author. We examined 1,024 such spam e-mails received by Marcin Kozak from publishers and journals over a period of 391 days, asking him to submit an article to their journal. We collected the following information: where the request came from; publishing model applied; fees charged; inclusion or not in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); and presence or not in Beall's (2014) listing of dubious journals. Our research showed that most of the publishers that sent e-mails inviting manuscripts were (i) using the open access model, (ii) using article-processing charges to fund their journal's operations; (iii) offering very short peer-review times, (iv) on Beall's list, and (v) misrepresenting the location of their headquarters. Some years ago, a letter of invitation to submit an article to a particular journal was considered a kind of distinction. Today, e-mails inviting submissions are generally spam, something that misleads young researchers and irritates experienced ones.
  4. Kozak, M.; Hartley, J.: Publication fees for open access journals : different disciplines-different methods (2013) 0.00 
    0.002060612 = product of:
  0.03296979 = sum of:
    0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 1140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03296979 = score(doc=1140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 1140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1140)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.12, S.2591-2594
  5. Tartanus, M.; Wnuk, A.; Kozak, M.; Hartley, J.: Graphs and prestige in agricultural journals (2013) 0.00 
    0.0018030355 = product of:
  0.028848568 = sum of:
    0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028848568 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.9, S.1946-1950
  6. Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Common weaknesses in traditional abstracts in the social sciences (2009) 0.00 
    0.0015454589 = product of:
  0.024727343 = sum of:
    0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024727343 = score(doc=3115,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3115, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3115)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.10, S.2010-2018
  7. Kozak, M.; Hartley, J.: Presenting numerical values within sentences and text tables (2012) 0.00 
    0.0015454589 = product of:
  0.024727343 = sum of:
    0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 4968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024727343 = score(doc=4968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 4968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4968)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.108-113
  8. Cabanac, G.; Hartley, J.: Issues of work-life balance among JASIST authors and editors (2013) 0.00 
    0.0015454589 = product of:
  0.024727343 = sum of:
    0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024727343 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.10, S.2182-2186
  9. Hartley, J.: Applying psychology to text design : a case history (1997) 0.00 
    0.0013586915 = product of:
  0.021739064 = sum of:
    0.021739064 = product of:
      0.043478128 = sum of:
        0.043478128 = weight(_text_:22 in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043478128 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.3-10
  10. Hartley, J.: Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines (2006) 0.00 
    0.0012878824 = product of:
  0.02060612 = sum of:
    0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02060612 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1194-1207
  11. Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: ¬The effects of spacing and titles on judgments of the effectiveness of structured abstracts (2007) 0.00 
    0.0012878824 = product of:
  0.02060612 = sum of:
    0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 1325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02060612 = score(doc=1325,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 1325, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1325)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.14, S.2335-2340
  12. Hartley, J.; Betts, L.: Revising and polishing a structured abstract : is it worth the time and effort? (2008) 0.00 
    0.0012878824 = product of:
  0.02060612 = sum of:
    0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02060612 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1870-1877
  13. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00 
    8.152149E-4 = product of:
  0.013043438 = sum of:
    0.013043438 = product of:
      0.026086876 = sum of:
        0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026086876 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  14. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00 
    6.7934574E-4 = product of:
  0.010869532 = sum of:
    0.010869532 = product of:
      0.021739064 = sum of:
        0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021739064 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 13
  • r 1

Themes