Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Järvelin, K."
  1. Toivonen, J.; Pirkola, A.; Keskustalo, H.; Visala, K.; Järvelin, K.: Translating cross-lingual spelling variants using transformation rules (2005) 0.02
    0.017523436 = product of:
      0.14018749 = sum of:
        0.046729162 = product of:
          0.093458325 = sum of:
            0.093458325 = weight(_text_:rules in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.093458325 = score(doc=1052,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.5782685 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.093458325 = weight(_text_:rules in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093458325 = score(doc=1052,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5782685 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Technical terms and proper names constitute a major problem in dictionary-based cross-language information retrieval (CLIR). However, technical terms and proper names in different languages often share the same Latin or Greek origin, being thus spelling variants of each other. In this paper we present a novel two-step fuzzy translation technique for cross-lingual spelling variants. In the first step, transformation rules are applied to source words to render them more similar to their target language equivalents. The rules are generated automatically using translation dictionaries as source data. In the second step, the intermediate forms obtained in the first step are translated into a target language using fuzzy matching. The effectiveness of the technique was evaluated empirically using five source languages and English as a target language. The two-step technique performed better, in some cases considerably better, than fuzzy matching alone. Even using the first step as such showed promising results.
  2. Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008) 0.01
    0.008801047 = product of:
      0.070408374 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=2694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
        0.029141452 = weight(_text_:american in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029141452 = score(doc=2694,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26635614 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Research evaluation is increasingly popular and important among research funding bodies and science policy makers. Various indicators have been proposed to evaluate the standing of individual scientists, institutions, journals, or countries. A simple and popular one among the indicators is the h-index, the Hirsch index (Hirsch 2005), which is an indicator for lifetime achievement of a scholar. Several other indicators have been proposed to complement or balance the h-index. However, these indicators have no conception of aging. The AR-index (Jin et al. 2007) incorporates aging but divides the received citation counts by the raw age of the publication. Consequently, the decay of a publication is very steep and insensitive to disciplinary differences. In addition, we believe that a publication becomes outdated only when it is no longer cited, not because of its age. Finally, all indicators treat citations as equally material when one might reasonably think that a citation from a heavily cited publication should weigh more than a citation froma non-cited or little-cited publication.We propose a new indicator, the Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index, which devalues old citations in a smooth way. It rewards an author for receiving new citations even if the publication is old. Further, it allows weighting of the citations by the citation weight of the citing publication. DCI can be used to calculate research performance on the basis of the h-core of a scholar or any other publication data.
    Content
    Erratum in: Järvelin, K., O. Persson: The DCI-index: discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation. Erratum re. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1433-1440
  3. Pharo, N.; Järvelin, K.: "Irrational" searchers and IR-rational researchers (2006) 0.01
    0.006407313 = product of:
      0.051258504 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 4922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=4922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4922)
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 4922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=4922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 4922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4922)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2006 18:33:26
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.2, S.222-232
  4. Ahlgren, P.; Järvelin, K.: Measuring impact of twelve information scientists using the DCI index (2010) 0.01
    0.006407313 = product of:
      0.051258504 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    19. 6.2010 18:26:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.7, S.1424-1439
  5. Näppilä, T.; Järvelin, K.; Niemi, T.: ¬A tool for data cube construction from structurally heterogeneous XML documents (2008) 0.00
    0.0039344565 = product of:
      0.031475652 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1369) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=1369,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1369, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1369)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    9. 2.2008 17:22:42
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.3, S.435-449
  6. Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI-index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008) 0.00
    0.002060612 = product of:
      0.03296979 = sum of:
        0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03296979 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352
  7. Pirkola, A.; Järvelin, K.: Employing the resolution power of search keys (2001) 0.00
    0.0018030355 = product of:
      0.028848568 = sum of:
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 5907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=5907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 5907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5907)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.7, S.575-583
  8. Niemi, T.; Hirvonen, L.; Järvelin, K.: Multidimensional data model and query language for informetrics (2003) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 1753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=1753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 1753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1753)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.10, S.939-951
  9. Järvelin, K.: ¬An analysis of two approaches in information retrieval : from frameworks to study designs (2007) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.7, S.971-986
  10. Lehtokangas, R.; Keskustalo, H.; Järvelin, K.: Experiments with transitive dictionary translation and pseudo-relevance feedback using graded relevance assessments (2008) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 1349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=1349,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 1349, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1349)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.3, S.476-488
  11. Järvelin, K.; Niemi, T.: Deductive information retrieval based on classifications (1993) 0.00
    0.0015454589 = product of:
      0.024727343 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2229,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2229, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2229)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(1993) no.10, S.557-578
  12. Järvelin, K.; Ingwersen, P.: User-oriented and cognitive models of information retrieval (2009) 0.00
    0.0013869622 = product of:
      0.022191396 = sum of:
        0.022191396 = product of:
          0.044382792 = sum of:
            0.044382792 = weight(_text_:ed in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044382792 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38893628 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  13. Kekäläinen, J.; Järvelin, K.: Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation (2002) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 5225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=5225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 5225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5225)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1120-xxxx
  14. Talvensaari, T.; Juhola, M.; Laurikkala, J.; Järvelin, K.: Corpus-based cross-language information retrieval in retrieval of highly relevant documents (2007) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=139,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 139, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=139)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.322-334
  15. Kumpulainen, S.; Järvelin, K.: Barriers to task-based information access in molecular medicine (2012) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 4965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=4965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 4965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4965)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.86-97
  16. Järvelin, K.; Kristensen, J.; Niemi, T.; Sormunen, E.; Keskustalo, H.: ¬A deductive data model for query expansion (1996) 0.00
    8.152149E-4 = product of:
      0.013043438 = sum of:
        0.013043438 = product of:
          0.026086876 = sum of:
            0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026086876 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (ACM SIGIR '96), Zürich, Switzerland, August 18-22, 1996. Eds.: H.P. Frei et al
  17. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.00
    8.152149E-4 = product of:
      0.013043438 = sum of:
        0.013043438 = product of:
          0.026086876 = sum of:
            0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026086876 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  18. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.00
    6.7934574E-4 = product of:
      0.010869532 = sum of:
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06