-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.005396694 = product of:
0.04317355 = sum of:
0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727343 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.018446209 = product of:
0.036892418 = sum of:
0.036892418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036892418 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007) (2010)
0.00
0.0025791824 = product of:
0.04126692 = sum of:
0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04126692 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The issue of duplicate publications has received a lot of attention in the medical literature, but much less in the information science community. This paper aims to analyze the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications across all fields of research between 1980 and 2007. Design/methodology/approach - The approach is a bibliometric analysis of duplicate papers based on their metadata. Duplicate papers are defined as papers published in two different journals having: the exact same title; the same first author; and the same number of cited references. Findings - In all fields combined, the prevalence of duplicates is one out of 2,000 papers, but is higher in the natural and medical sciences than in the social sciences and humanities. A very high proportion (>85 percent) of these papers are published the same year or one year apart, which suggest that most duplicate papers were submitted simultaneously. Furthermore, duplicate papers are generally published in journals with impact factors below the average of their field and obtain lower citations. Originality/value - The paper provides clear evidence that the prevalence of duplicate papers is low and, more importantly, that the scientific impact of such papers is below average.
-
Atanassova, I.; Bertin, M.; Larivière, V.: On the composition of scientific abstracts (2016)
0.00
0.0025791824 = product of:
0.04126692 = sum of:
0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 3028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04126692 = score(doc=3028,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 3028, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3028)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Scientific abstracts reproduce only part of the information and the complexity of argumentation in a scientific article. The purpose of this paper provides a first analysis of the similarity between the text of scientific abstracts and the body of articles, using sentences as the basic textual unit. It contributes to the understanding of the structure of abstracts. Design/methodology/approach - Using sentence-based similarity metrics, the authors quantify the phenomenon of text re-use in abstracts and examine the positions of the sentences that are similar to sentences in abstracts in the introduction, methods, results and discussion structure, using a corpus of over 85,000 research articles published in the seven Public Library of Science journals. Findings - The authors provide evidence that 84 percent of abstract have at least one sentence in common with the body of the paper. Studying the distributions of sentences in the body of the articles that are re-used in abstracts, the authors show that there exists a strong relation between the rhetorical structure of articles and the zones that authors re-use when writing abstracts, with sentences mainly coming from the beginning of the introduction and the end of the conclusion. Originality/value - Scientific abstracts contain what is considered by the author(s) as information that best describe documents' content. This is a first study that examines the relation between the contents of abstracts and the rhetorical structure of scientific articles. The work might provide new insight for improving automatic abstracting tools as well as information retrieval approaches, in which text organization and structure are important features.
-
Chen, L.; Ding, J.; Larivière, V.: Measuring the citation context of national self-references : how a web journal club is used (2022)
0.00
0.0025791824 = product of:
0.04126692 = sum of:
0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04126692 = score(doc=545,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 545, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=545)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- The emphasis on research evaluation has brought scrutiny to the role of self-citations in the scholarly communication process. While author self-citations have been studied at length, little is known on national-level self-references (SRs). This paper analyses the citation context of national SRs, using the full-text of 184,859 papers published in PLOS journals. It investigates the differences between national SRs and nonself-references (NSRs) in terms of their in-text mention, presence in enumerations, and location features. For all countries, national SRs exhibit a higher level of engagement than NSRs. NSRs are more often found in enumerative citances than SRs, which suggests that researchers pay more attention to domestic than foreign studies. There are more mentions of national research in the methods section, which provides evidence that methodologies developed in a nation are more likely to be used by other researchers from the same nation. Publications from the United States are cited at a higher rate in each of the sections, indicating that the country still maintains a dominant position in science. On the whole, this paper contributes to a better understanding of the role of national SRs in the scholarly communication system, and how it varies across countries and over time.
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The impact factor's Matthew Effect : a natural experiment in bibliometrics (2010)
0.00
0.0015454589 = product of:
0.024727343 = sum of:
0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 3338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727343 = score(doc=3338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 3338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3338)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.424-427
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Bergeron, P.: In their own image? : a comparison of doctoral students' and faculty members' referencing behavior (2013)
0.00
0.0015454589 = product of:
0.024727343 = sum of:
0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727343 = score(doc=751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.5, S.1045-1054
-
Larivière, V.; Archambault, V.; Gingras, Y.; Vignola-Gagné, E.: ¬The place of serials in referencing practices : comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities (2006)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.997-1004
-
Larivière, V.; Archambault, E.; Gingras, Y.: Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature : from exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004) (2008)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 1357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=1357,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 1357, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1357)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.2, S.288-296
-
Lisée, C.; Larivière, V.; Archambault, E.: Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information : a bibliometric analysis (2008)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1776-1784
-
Archambault, E.; Campbell, D; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus (2009)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=2933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2933)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.7, S.1320-1326
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact (2009)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 3316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=3316,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 3316, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3316)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.126-131
-
Larivière, V.; Macaluso, B.: Improving the coverage of social science and humanities researchers' output : the case of the Érudit journal platform (2011)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 4943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=4943,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 4943, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4943)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2437-2442
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.997-1016
-
Kirchik, O.; Gingras, Y.; Larivière, V.: Changes in publication languages and citation practices and their effect on the scientific impact of Russian science (1993-2010) (2012)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1411-1419
-
Lozano, G.A.; Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.: ¬The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.11, S.2140-2145
-
Haustein, S.; Sugimoto, C.; Larivière, V.: Social media in scholarly communication : Guest editorial (2015)
0.00
4.0760744E-4 = product of:
0.006521719 = sum of:
0.006521719 = product of:
0.013043438 = sum of:
0.013043438 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013043438 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
