Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  1. Svenonius, E.: ¬The conceptual foundations of descriptive cataloging (1989) 0.10
    0.10261289 = product of:
      0.54726875 = sum of:
        0.26971826 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26971826 = score(doc=5434,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            1.5005972 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
        0.13877523 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13877523 = score(doc=5434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.9726176 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
        0.13877523 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13877523 = score(doc=5434,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.9726176 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    COMPASS
    Descriptive cataloguing
    Subject
    Descriptive cataloguing
  2. Molto, M.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An electronic interface to AACR2 (1998) 0.04
    0.036469705 = product of:
      0.1945051 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=2838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
        0.054517355 = product of:
          0.10903471 = sum of:
            0.10903471 = weight(_text_:rules in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10903471 = score(doc=2838,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.6746466 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.10903471 = weight(_text_:rules in 2838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10903471 = score(doc=2838,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6746466 = fieldWeight in 2838, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2838)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a project to explore ways of reconfiguring AACR2 for use in an automated environment. A subset of AACR2 title proper rules for books was chosen for analysis. A functional classification of the rule subset was developed, based on the 4 facets: Source, Choice, Form, and Definition. The rules were also classified according to whether they were core or peripheral. A prototype electronic interface was developed for searching and displaying the classified rules. The greatest problem in the rule reconfiguration stemmed from the structural problems of AACR2: rule groupings combining multiple subfacets under a single rule; rule redundancy; and rule scatter, between chapters, and between sections of chapters and appendices
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.1, S.3-24
  3. Svenonius, E.: Facet definition: a case study (1978) 0.03
    0.028537598 = product of:
      0.15220052 = sum of:
        0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05777369 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=2623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Historical account of the sophisticated method of indexing developed by J.O. Kaiser (1896/97), a librarian at the Philadelphia Commercial Museum who established his index on cards (a novelty then) and distinguished his items according to the categories 'concrete', 'process', and 'country'. He also introduced "statement indexing" and rules to this end in order to permit the supply of "complete information" on a subject in a document. In summarizing these findings, the author stresses the necessitiy of establishing well-defined categories if an organization of terms is to serve e.g. information retrieval.
  4. Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979) 0.01
    0.014307825 = product of:
      0.1144626 = sum of:
        0.0381542 = product of:
          0.0763084 = sum of:
            0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0763084 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0763084 = score(doc=1427,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
  5. Svenonius, E.: ¬The impact of computer technology on knowledge representations (1992) 0.01
    0.013641143 = product of:
      0.109129146 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
        0.078176126 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078176126 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.43406096 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Cognitive paradigms in knowledge organisation. 2nd Int. ISKO Conf., Madras, 26.-28.8.1992
  6. Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986) 0.01
    0.01011716 = product of:
      0.08093728 = sum of:
        0.026979093 = product of:
          0.053958185 = sum of:
            0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053958185 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053958185 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The problem addressed in this paper is that of simplifying access point determination. A critique is made of the simple, mechanical rule whereby every name appearing in certain designatable locations within a publication qualifies as an access point. Then a more acceptable version of the every-name-an-access-point rule is tested empirically against a sample of 400 English language monographs. Conclusions reached concern (1) the responsibility profiles of these monographs, i.e., how many authors, editors, illustrators and emanators are typically associated with them and in what combinations, and (2) the relative productivity of different locations within them, e.g., title pages and tables of contents, as sources of access points. The study was conceived to be exploratory in nature and its findings suggest further research that could be done to provide empirical validation for rules for access point determination.
  7. McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An interview with Elaine Svenonius (2000) 0.01
    0.007865144 = product of:
      0.1258423 = sum of:
        0.1258423 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1258423 = score(doc=5356,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.70013285 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    In an interview with Dorothy McGarry, Elaine Svenonius discusses her many-faceted career. Topics include her research interests in subject and descriptive cataloging (Svenonius notes that it "takes some untangling of vocabulary and semantics to see that the traditional bifurcation separating subject and descriptive cataloging is artificial"); her teaching experience, especially her use of Andrew Osborn's "active learning" seminar method; and her views about the development of information science and its relationship to librarianship.
  8. Svenonius, E.: ¬The intellectual foundation of information organization (2000) 0.01
    0.006744773 = product of:
      0.053958185 = sum of:
        0.017986061 = product of:
          0.035972122 = sum of:
            0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035972122 = score(doc=5056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035972122 = score(doc=5056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.173-175 (G. Campbell): "Bibliographic control rests on a rich and intriguing theoretical foundation. All too often, however, students and scholars of information studies pass this foundation over, perhaps because of its fragmentation. Information organization theory has evolved in tandem with practice, and particularly through innumerable policy decisions: its central tenets, therefore, appear in prefaces to manuals and catalogues, in library bulletins, in standards and rule interpretations, and in professional and scholarly conference proceedings. Gathering this theory together is a formidable task, and Svenonius has already made a significant contribution through the two sourcebooks she has coedited: Foundations of Cataloging (1985), and Theory of Subject Analysis (1985). With The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, 'Svenonius goes a huge step further: she pulls the fragments of bibliographic control theory together and sets them within a holistic theoretical framework. The result is a significant contribution to LIS scholarship, one which evokes the best of all possible responses: dissatisfied cries for more. Svenonius divides her treatise into two parts containing five chapters each. The first part provides a theoretically-grounded articulation of the objectives, entities, languages and principles of information organization. The field, she argues, rests on three distinct philsophical traditions. Systems philosophy, as developed in library circles by Charles Cutter, gives a holistic and visionary dimension to bibliographic control: a tendency to see individual processes as part of a larger, coherent structure. The philosophy of science, typified in the field by Cyril Cleverdon in the 1950s, emphasizes the need to quantify and generalize, and to subject the tenets of information retrieval to empirical verification. Language philosophy introduces the concept of language rules, and argues that information organization is a "particular kind of language use" (p. 6): an approach which enables us to employ linguistic concepts of semantics, vocabulary and syntax to explain the processes of information organization. Having established this framework, Svenonius goes on to discuss the objectives of bibliographic retrieval systems. Deftly combining the seminal contributions of Cutter, Seymour Lubetzky, the Paris Principles of 1961, and the IFLA objectives of 1997, she produces five central objectives of bibliographic control: locating entitles (finding), identifying entitles (collocating), selecting them (choice), acquiring or gaining access to them (acquisition), and navigating a bibliographic database (navigation) (p. 20)". -
  9. Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic control (1990) 0.00
    0.0022416692 = product of:
      0.035866708 = sum of:
        0.035866708 = product of:
          0.071733415 = sum of:
            0.071733415 = weight(_text_:ed in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071733415 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.6286159 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Academic libraries: research perspectives. Ed.: M.J. Lynch
  10. Svenonius, E.: Access to nonbook materials : the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages (1994) 0.00
    0.002060612 = product of:
      0.03296979 = sum of:
        0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03296979 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.600-606
  11. Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990) 0.00
    0.002060612 = product of:
      0.03296979 = sum of:
        0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03296979 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.254-263
  12. Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986) 0.00
    0.002060612 = product of:
      0.03296979 = sum of:
        0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03296979 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986) no.5, S.331-340
  13. Svenonius, E.: Bibliographical classification (1990) 0.00
    0.0019614608 = product of:
      0.031383373 = sum of:
        0.031383373 = product of:
          0.062766746 = sum of:
            0.062766746 = weight(_text_:ed in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062766746 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.55003893 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Library classification and its functions. Int. Conf. on ..., 20.-21.6.1989, Edmonton, Alberta. Ed.: A. Nitecki u. T. Fell
  14. Svenonius, E.: Indexical contents (1982) 0.00
    0.001681252 = product of:
      0.026900033 = sum of:
        0.026900033 = product of:
          0.053800065 = sum of:
            0.053800065 = weight(_text_:ed in 27) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053800065 = score(doc=27,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 27, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=27)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
  15. Svenonius, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities (1992) 0.00
    0.0011208346 = product of:
      0.017933354 = sum of:
        0.017933354 = product of:
          0.035866708 = sum of:
            0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 2084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866708 = score(doc=2084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 2084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  16. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.00
    0.0011208346 = product of:
      0.017933354 = sum of:
        0.017933354 = product of:
          0.035866708 = sum of:
            0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866708 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
  17. Svenonius, E.; Liu, S.; Subrahmanyam, B.: Automation of chain indexing (1992) 0.00
    8.40626E-4 = product of:
      0.013450016 = sum of:
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 2114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=2114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 2114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  18. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.00
    8.40626E-4 = product of:
      0.013450016 = sum of:
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
  19. Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1997) 0.00
    8.40626E-4 = product of:
      0.013450016 = sum of:
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=583,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 583, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=583)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  20. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    8.40626E-4 = product of:
      0.013450016 = sum of:
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone