-
Mercun, T.; Zumer, M.; Aalberg, T.: Presenting bibliographic families : Designing an FRBR-based prototype using information visualization (2016)
0.06
0.0558771 = product of:
0.17880672 = sum of:
0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04126692 = score(doc=2879,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035046037 = score(doc=2879,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
0.022482576 = product of:
0.04496515 = sum of:
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=2879,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035046037 = score(doc=2879,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 2879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=2879,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 2879, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2879)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Despite the importance of bibliographic information systems for discovering and exploring library resources, some of the core functionality that should be provided to support users in their information seeking process is still missing. Investigating these issues, the purpose of this paper is to design a solution that would fulfil the missing objectives. Design/methodology/approach - Building on the concepts of a work family, functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) and information visualization, the paper proposes a model and user interface design that could support a more efficient and user-friendly presentation and navigation in bibliographic information systems. Findings - The proposed design brings together all versions of a work, related works, and other works by and about the author and shows how the model was implemented into a FrbrVis prototype system using hierarchical visualization layout. Research limitations/implications - Although issues related to discovery and exploration apply to various material types, the research first focused on works of fiction and was also limited by the selected sample of records. Practical implications - The model for presenting and interacting with FRBR-based data can serve as a good starting point for future developments and implementations. Originality/value - With FRBR concepts being gradually integrated into cataloguing rules, formats, and various bibliographic services, one of the important questions that has not really been investigated and studied is how the new type of data would be presented to users in a way that would exploit the true potential of the changes.
-
Dimec, Z.; Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Slovenian cataloguing practice and Functional Requirements for Bibliography Records : a comparative analysis (2004)
0.05
0.047056586 = product of:
0.18822634 = sum of:
0.055614963 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 5857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055614963 = score(doc=5857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3094179 = fieldWeight in 5857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5857)
0.06070152 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06070152 = score(doc=5857,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.42543158 = fieldWeight in 5857, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5857)
0.06070152 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06070152 = score(doc=5857,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.42543158 = fieldWeight in 5857, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5857)
0.011208346 = product of:
0.022416692 = sum of:
0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 5857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022416692 = score(doc=5857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 5857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- The IFLA study Functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) set a new frame for both cataloguing codes and subject analysis. The Paris Principles defined the functions of the catalogue followed by both cataloguing codes used in Slovenia: P. Kalan's Abecedni imenski katalog and E. Verona's Pravilnik i prirunik za izradbe abecednih kataloga. FRBR defines the functions for records themselves, irrespective of the type of the database consisting of these records. Compared to the requirements for the national bibliographic records as defined by FRBR, the records belonging to the Slovenian national bibliography show more descriptive elements and less notes on bibliographic history, which reflects in lack of uniform titles. As the uniform title itself enables the identification of related works and their expressions, this practice does not satisfy the FRBR requirements. Differences in the extent of records for different types of material derive from decentralised processing at the National and University Library. It is therefore necessary to establish uniform criteria for both the materials included into the Slovenian national bibliography, and the extent of data elements.
- Source
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): hype or cure-all. Ed. by P. le Boeuf,
-
Aalberg, T.; Zumer, M.: ¬The value of MARC data, or, challenges of frbrisation (2013)
0.03
0.03438495 = product of:
0.1375398 = sum of:
0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035046037 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
0.022482576 = product of:
0.04496515 = sum of:
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035046037 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 1769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=1769,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 1769, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1769)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Bibliographic records should now be used in innovative end-user applications that enable users to learn about, discover and exploit available content, and this information should be interpreted and reused also beyond the library domain. New conceptual models such as FRBR offer the foundation for such developments. The main motivation for this research is to contribute to the adoption of the FRBR model in future bibliographic standards and systems, by analysing limitations in existing bibliographic information and looking for short- and long-term solutions that can improve the data quality in terms of expressing the FRBR model. Design/methodology/approach - MARC records in three collections (BIBSYS catalogue, Slovenian National Bibliography and BTJ catalogue) were first analysed by looking at statistics of field and subfield usage to determine common patterns that express FRBR. Based on this, different rules for interpreting the information were developed. Finally typical problems/errors found in MARC records were analysed. Findings - Different types of FRBR entity-relationship structures that typically can be found in bibliographic records are identified. Problems related to interpreting these from bibliographic records are analyzed. Frbrisation of consistent and complete MARC records is relatively successful, particularly if all entities are systematically described and relationships among them are clearly indicated. Research limitations/implications - Advanced matching was not used for clustering of identical entities. Practical implications - Cataloguing guidelines are proposed to enable better frbrisation of MARC records in the interim period, before new formats are developed and implemented. Originality/value - This is the first in depth analysis of manifestations embodying several expressions and of works and agents as subjects.
-
Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017)
0.03
0.031824045 = product of:
0.16972825 = sum of:
0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030953024 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069387615 = score(doc=5179,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069387615 = score(doc=5179,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Definition of a conceptual reference model to provide a framework for the analysis of non-administrative metadata relating to library resources. The resulting model definition was approved by the FRBR Review Group (November 2016), and then made available to the Standing Committees of the Sections on Cataloguing and Subject Analysis & Access, as well as to the ISBD Review Group, for comment in December 2016. The final document was approved by the IFLACommittee on Standards (August 2017).
- Date
- 19. 3.2019 12:26:29
- Source
- https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017.pdf
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004)
0.03
0.027434723 = product of:
0.14631853 = sum of:
0.06867593 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06867593 = score(doc=2646,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4813209 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.06867593 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06867593 = score(doc=2646,freq=12.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4813209 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.008966677 = product of:
0.017933354 = sum of:
0.017933354 = weight(_text_:ed in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017933354 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- In the last decade a discussion has been going an in the Division of Bibliographic Control of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) about the principles of cataloguing. This discussion was initiated by the widespread replacement of the card and list catalogues by Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) since 1980. In this paper we discuss the role of subject cataloguing in three important documents that are the results of this discussion. Our conclusion is that the interest in subject cataloguing has grown remarkably, but is still not an the level it deserves given the fact that a great part of all searches in OPACs are subject oriented.
- Content
- 1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: ¬The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and knowledge organization (2003)
0.02
0.021341361 = product of:
0.1138206 = sum of:
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
0.015691686 = product of:
0.031383373 = sum of:
0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031383373 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR, 1998), the study commissioned by IFLA, brings revolutionary changes in the way we see modern computer catalogues. The catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a copy of a card catalogue, but as an interconnected network of related information. Implications of the new model for the future development of catalogues are discussed. Special attention is given to access points and relationships between entities and the changes those will bring into both the formal and subject cataloguing, and authority files.
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 2: comparison task and conclusions (2010)
0.01
0.012390645 = product of:
0.09912516 = sum of:
0.04956258 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04956258 = score(doc=4146,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3473634 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
0.04956258 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04956258 = score(doc=4146,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3473634 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The paper aims to provide some insight into mental models of the bibliographic universe and how they compare with functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) as a conceptual model of the bibliographic universe. Design/methodology/approach - To get a more complete picture of the mental models, different elicitation techniques were used. The three tasks of the paper were: card-sorting, concept mapping and comparison task. The paper deals with comparison task, which consisted of interviews and rankings, and provides a discussion of the results of the paper as a whole. Findings - Results of the ranking part of the comparison task confirm the findings of concept mapping task. In both cases, while there are individual differences between mental models, on average they gravitate towards FRBR. Research limitations/implications - This is a small study and it provides only a glimpse of the implications of using FRBR as a conceptual basis for cataloguing. More FRBR-related user studies are needed, including similar studies on different groups of individuals and different types of materials, as well as practical studies of user needs and user interfaces. Practical implications - The results of this study are the first user-tested indication of the validity of FRBR as a conceptual basis for the future of cataloguing. Originality/value - This is the first published paper of mental models of the bibliographic universe and uses a unique combination of mental model elicitation techniques.
-
Le Boeuf, P.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR - Library Reference Model : draft for World-Wide Review (2016)
0.01
0.010513811 = product of:
0.08411049 = sum of:
0.042055245 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042055245 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.29474765 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.042055245 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042055245 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.29474765 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Source
- www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/frbr-lrm_20160225.pdf
-
Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 1: mental models of descriptions (2010)
0.01
0.008761509 = product of:
0.070092075 = sum of:
0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035046037 = score(doc=4145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 4145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4145)
0.035046037 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035046037 = score(doc=4145,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.24562302 = fieldWeight in 4145, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4145)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The paper aims to present the results of the first two tasks of a user study looking into mental models of the bibliographic universe and especially their comparison to the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) conceptual model, which has not yet been user tested. Design/methodology/approach - The paper employes a combination of techniques for eliciting mental models and consisted of three tasks, two of which, card sorting and concept mapping, are presented herein. Its participants were 30 individuals residing in the general area of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Findings - Cumulative results of concept mapping show a strong resemblance to FRBR. Card sorts did not produce conclusive results. In both tasks, participants paid special attention to the original expression, indicating that a special place for it should be considered. Research limitations/implications - The study was performed using a relatively small sample of participants living in a geographically limited space using relatively straight-forward examples. Practical implications - Some solid evidence is provided for adoption of FRBR as the conceptual basis for cataloguing. Originality/value - This is the first widely published user study of FRBR, applying novel methodological approaches in the field of Library and Information Science.
-
Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: Introducing the FRBR library reference model (2015)
0.01
0.0070092073 = product of:
0.05607366 = sum of:
0.02803683 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02803683 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.19649842 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
0.02803683 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02803683 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.19649842 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Content
- Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2015 - Cape Town, South Africa in Session 207 - Cataloguing. Vgl. den Kommentar von H. Wiesenmüller [Mail vom 25.06.2015]: "hier etwas höchst Spannendes - eine knappe Darstellung des konsolidierten FR-Modells, auf das wir schon so lange warten, und das im kommenden Jahr in das weltweite Begutachtungsverfahren gehen soll: http://library.ifla.org/1084/. Ich muss das Paper selbst auch erst in Ruhe lesen, sehe aber beim schnellen Durchblättern mit Freude bestätigt, dass die Gruppe-3-Entitäten aus FRBR tatsächlich abgeschafft werden. Die FRSAD-Entität "Thema" (die für alles stehen kann, was Thema eins Werks ist) wird umgetauft in "Res" (von lateinisch "res", Sache) und steht für "any entity in the universe of discourse". Die Entitäten der Gruppe 2 heißen jetzt zusammenfassend "Agent" und teilen sich auf in "Person" und "Group", wobei letzteres Körperschaften und Familien umfasst. Neu eingeführt wird "Time-span". Auf den ersten Blick scheint das jedenfalls alles ganz gut durchdacht zu sein."
-
Zumer, M.: User interfaces of national bibliographies on CD-ROM : results of a survey (2000)
0.00
0.003869128 = product of:
0.061906047 = sum of:
0.061906047 = weight(_text_:26 in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061906047 = score(doc=4896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5462547 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 11:03:13
-
Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014)
0.00
0.0033116818 = product of:
0.05298691 = sum of:
0.05298691 = sum of:
0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026900033 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026086876 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Zumer, M.: Dedication [to Zlata Dimec] (2004)
0.00
0.001681252 = product of:
0.026900033 = sum of:
0.026900033 = product of:
0.053800065 = sum of:
0.053800065 = weight(_text_:ed in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053800065 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): hype or cure-all. Ed. by P. le Boeuf,
-
Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM)-harmonisation of the FRBR family (2018)
0.00
0.0016581976 = product of:
0.026531162 = sum of:
0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026531162 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 1. 8.2018 12:26:17
-
Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007)
0.00
0.0016304298 = product of:
0.026086876 = sum of:
0.026086876 = product of:
0.052173752 = sum of:
0.052173752 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052173752 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Content
- Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Vilar, P.; Zumer, M.: Perceptions and importance of user friendliness of IR systems according to users' individual characteristics and academic discipline (2008)
0.00
0.0012878824 = product of:
0.02060612 = sum of:
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=2378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2378)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1995-2007
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.00
0.001152888 = product of:
0.018446209 = sum of:
0.018446209 = product of:
0.036892418 = sum of:
0.036892418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036892418 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Zumer, M.: Implementation of FRBR : European research initiative (2004)
0.00
0.0011208346 = product of:
0.017933354 = sum of:
0.017933354 = product of:
0.035866708 = sum of:
0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 5858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035866708 = score(doc=5858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 5858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR): hype or cure-all. Ed. by P. le Boeuf,
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014)
0.00
9.6073997E-4 = product of:
0.0153718395 = sum of:
0.0153718395 = product of:
0.030743679 = sum of:
0.030743679 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030743679 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
-
Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005)
0.00
9.51084E-4 = product of:
0.015217344 = sum of:
0.015217344 = product of:
0.030434689 = sum of:
0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030434689 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 1.11.2005 18:56:22
