-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.16
0.16271803 = product of:
0.43391472 = sum of:
0.114362255 = weight(_text_:author in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114362255 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.7386374 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.09712243 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09712243 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6806905 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.035972122 = product of:
0.071944244 = sum of:
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.09712243 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09712243 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6806905 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.017391251 = product of:
0.034782503 = sum of:
0.034782503 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034782503 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(6/16)
- Abstract
- Examines in detail the author cataloguing practices adopted by the Italian National Library Service, as set out in its 1995 Cataloguing Guide (Guida SBN), and discusses how far these practices accord with the standard 1979 RICA author cataloguing rules. Since the author headings prescribed by RICA include personal names, corporate names and titles, this survey looks at all such SBN catalogue entries having an access point function. Presents many examples of standard and variant forms of heading, and reviews control procedures
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:40:57
-
Petrucciani, A.: RDA: a critical analysis based on cataloguing theory and practice (2016)
0.08
0.08424952 = product of:
0.33699808 = sum of:
0.11126773 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11126773 = score(doc=2950,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.779829 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
0.0381542 = product of:
0.0763084 = sum of:
0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0763084 = score(doc=2950,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11126773 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11126773 = score(doc=2950,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.779829 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0763084 = score(doc=2950,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- RDA appears to be an hybrid standard: a list containing a high number of bibliographic elements and a rewrite - more formal than substantial - of cataloguing practices established with AACR2. In this document, RDA guidelines are analysed trying to compare them to the requirements of good cataloguing rules. Cataloguing rules in general shold not be an abstract and self-referential model but an effective tool to analyse and represent cultural phenomena, useful to qualified staff and helpful in learning about users need. From this point of view, RDA is quite disappointing: many relevant and frequent cataloguing issues are not mentioned at all, and cataloguing itself is left without real guidelines. A certain number of omissions, mistakes and individual flawness in the text should be modified by RDA board with a deep analysis of real cataloguing activities.
-
Aghemo, A.: Anche l'arte ha sue regole : e possibile anche per il bibliotecario del servizio d'informazione fondare la sua attivita su un 'codice' certo? (1993)
0.06
0.06492908 = product of:
0.20777307 = sum of:
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.031475607 = product of:
0.062951215 = sum of:
0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062951215 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062951215 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.015217344 = product of:
0.030434689 = sum of:
0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 3809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030434689 = score(doc=3809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.3125 = coord(5/16)
- Abstract
- In some areas of librarianship, such as cataloguing and subject classification, there are established rulebooks to guide librarians in their work. Information librarians however have no such aid; their metier is more an art than a profession, since reader queries may concern any aspect of human knowledge. After analysing hundreds of information library reader requests; G. Jahoda and colleagues have sought to formulate self-operating rules for interpreting such queries, utilising the 2 basic elements - what is 'known' and what is 'required' - contained in each request. Lists the categories into which each element breaks down. When presented in matrix form these can indicate the type of reference work to consult to resolve any reader queries
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
-
Sambataro, A.: Ai margini, ma non marginali (1996)
0.06
0.05501592 = product of:
0.22006369 = sum of:
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=5552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 5552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5552)
0.035972122 = product of:
0.071944244 = sum of:
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 5552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=5552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 5552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5552)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=5552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 5552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5552)
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 5552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=5552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 5552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5552)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Discusses the bibligraphical value of authors' handwritten marginal notes, comments and explanations. Such notes may be merely trivial, or consist of invective, but some examples have proved extremely useful for the comprehension of obscure or contradictory texts. The possibility of surprising discoveries in marginal notes has always attracted some researchers to this field. Cataloguing such notes by fixed rules is difficult; as a bibliographical entity, each note is unique and unrepeatable. Librarians should be flexible and intuitive in their approach. Supports the thesis with historical references and quotations
-
Revelli, C.: Ranganathan verniciato a nuovo (1996)
0.06
0.05501592 = product of:
0.22006369 = sum of:
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.035972122 = product of:
0.071944244 = sum of:
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Abstract
- Discusses the 5 new laws of library science formulated by M. Gorman (1995) as an updated reinterpretation of Ranganathan's original rules. Notes Gorman's hostility to outsourcing, his belief that uncontrolled automation in libraries will harm cataloguing, and his view that there will always be a role for printed and other non electronic forms of communication. Reviews also the alternative 'Five new laws of librarianship' proposed by M. Line (1996). Concludes that Ranganathan's 5 precepts remain valid in today's changed conditions
-
Lunati, G.: On line union catalogue (OLUC) compie 25 anni (1996)
0.03
0.029231736 = product of:
0.1559026 = sum of:
0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05777369 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Describes the origins and development to date of OLUC, the worldwide bibliographic database of OCLC launched by Ohio College in 1971. OLUC now has over 34m records, with publications in 400 languages. Aftere arly criticism of database accuracy, OCLC began quality improvement programmes in the 1990s, introducing the TechPro 'turnkey cataloguing' and Prompt-Cat acquisitions services. Explains how OLUC solved the 3 problems of duplicated records, sparse bibliographic data, and too many author and subject headings. OCLC has invested heavily in improving data quality, launching an authority control service in early 1996. Provides details of several cooperation programmes started by OCLC, e.g. Conser, USNP, NACO, Enhance and others
-
Dumontet, C.: Cataloghi a strisce (1995)
0.02
0.024280608 = product of:
0.19424486 = sum of:
0.09712243 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09712243 = score(doc=4425,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6806905 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
0.09712243 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09712243 = score(doc=4425,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6806905 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Analyses some problems that arise when cataloguing comic book/strip cartoon publications using the USMARC format, suggesting solutions for each of the 4 main forms in which cartoon titles appear - periodical titles; stories within periodicals and serials; serial titles; and albums - in the context of AACR2 interpretations. For genre cataloguing, terminology from an 'open' system such as the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) is preferable to the LCSH. Suggests ways to overcome USMARC's limitations when cataloguing cartoon characters
-
Kempf, K.: Dalla Germania un esempio avanzato di sistema integrato (1997)
0.02
0.024202863 = product of:
0.12908193 = sum of:
0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030953024 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Examines the structure and functions of the Bavarian regional electronic network, the Bibliotheksverbund Bayern (BVB), linking more than 60 academic and sceintific libraries. Utilising the Sokrates automation program, the system promotes close cooperation in technical and management matters, especially in relation to acquisitions, cataloguing, data retrieval and loans. BVB projects include the following: reconversion and digitization of printed catalogues, starting with the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek; automation of remote lending operations (within the national DBV-OSI scheme); the Elektra document order and supply service; and an electronic full-text document project
- Source
- Biblioteche oggi. 15(1997) no.2, S.20-26
-
Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008)
0.02
0.024202863 = product of:
0.12908193 = sum of:
0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030953024 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- In this article are compared traditional OPAC systems, enriched OPAC, social OPAC and social cataloguing systems.the aim is to underline new theoretical trends and to offer a taxonomic outline of such tools, according to the interaction level granted to users and to the chance to manage user's generated contents in the point of view of the application of web 2.0 tendecies to libraries, in the library 2.0. At the end, a brief review of softwares, both open source and not, that seem promising for this future application.
- Source
- Biblioteche oggi. 26(2008) no.2, S.82-92
-
Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998)
0.02
0.021252422 = product of:
0.11334625 = sum of:
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
0.015217344 = product of:
0.030434689 = sum of:
0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030434689 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:41:06
-
Serrai, A.: Storia e critica della catalogazione bibliografica (1994)
0.02
0.019825032 = product of:
0.15860026 = sum of:
0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07930013 = score(doc=1418,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07930013 = score(doc=1418,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Describes the work of mediaeval librarians such as Paulaus Melissus and looks at current problems in cataloguing bibliographies. One of these is that the material used does not have the precise algorithmic format required by information technology; today's electronic cataloguing methods are merely a translation of the former manual ones e.g. book title keywords, and have similar defects. Analyses the 3 basi features of books i.e. text, text edition and materials used, and criticises traditional indexing methods
-
Revelli, C.: Catalogare dopo il crollo del muro (1994)
0.02
0.019825032 = product of:
0.15860026 = sum of:
0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07930013 = score(doc=2409,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07930013 = score(doc=2409,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- The Deutsches Bibliotheksinstitut has undergone radical restructuring since German reunification. One urgent task was to adapt the Marxist oriented Klassifikation für Allgemeinbibliotheken (KAB) to new automated cataloguing systems. Analyses the new 1993 edition of the KAB, described as useful but insufficient, and points out some defects in the current Regeln für die alphabetische Katalgisierung (RAK)
- Footnote
- Cataloguing after the fall of the Berlin wall
-
Tammaro, A.M.: Catalogando, catalogando ... metacatalogando (1997)
0.02
0.017346904 = product of:
0.13877523 = sum of:
0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069387615 = score(doc=902,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069387615 = score(doc=902,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Cataloguing, cataloguing ... metacataloguing
-
Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007)
0.02
0.016547758 = product of:
0.06619103 = sum of:
0.014018415 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014018415 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.09824921 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.012718067 = product of:
0.025436133 = sum of:
0.025436133 = weight(_text_:rules in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025436133 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.15738475 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014018415 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014018415 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.09824921 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.025436133 = weight(_text_:rules in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025436133 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.15738475 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
0.25 = coord(4/16)
- Footnote
- The guide Nuovo soggettario was presented on February 8' 2007 at a one-day seminar in the Palazzo Vecchio, Florence, in front of some 500 spellbound people. The Nuovo soggettario comes in two parts: the guide in book-form and an accompanying CD-ROM, by way of which a prototype of the thesaurus may be accessed on the Internet. In the former, rules are stated; the latter contains a pdf version of the guide and the first installment of the controlled vocabulary, which is to be further enriched and refined. Syntactic instructions (general application guidelines, as well as special annotations of particular terms) and the compiled subject strings file have yet to be added. The essentials of the new system are: 1) an analytic-synthetic approach, 2) use of terms (units of controlled vocabulary) and subject strings (which represent subjects by combining terms in linear order to form syntactic relationships), instead of main headings and subdivisions, 3) specificity of terms and strings, with a view to the co-extension of subject string and subject matter and 4) a clear distinction between semantic and syntactic relationships, with full control of them both. Basic features of the vocabulary include the uniformity and univocality of terms and thesaural management of a priori (semantic) relationships. Starting from its definition, each term can be categorially analyzed: four macro-categories are represented (agents, action, things, time), for which there are subcategories called facets (e.g., for actions: activities, disciplines, processes), which in turn have sub-facets. Morphological instructions conform to national and international standards, including BS 8723, ANSI/ NISO Z39.19 and the IFLA draft of Guidelines for multilingual thesauri, even for syntactic factorization. Different kinds of semantic relationships are represented thoroughly, and particular attention is paid to poly-hierarchies, which are used only in moderation: both top terms must actually be relevant. Node labels are used to specify the principle of division applied. Instance relationships are also used.
Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."
-
Salarelli, A.: Nella notte dove tuttel la vacche sono nere qualcuno prova ad accendere un cerino (1996)
0.01
0.014868774 = product of:
0.118950196 = sum of:
0.059475098 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059475098 = score(doc=5763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4168361 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
0.059475098 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059475098 = score(doc=5763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4168361 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Library science may well have an essential role to play in efficiently organising the huge amount of Internet information available in the various scientific disciplines. The basic problem is to develop a cataloguing theory sufficiently flexible to cope with the impact of an ever changing store of network data. Such a theory would abondon the utopian idea of a 'catalogue of ctalogues', seeking instead to match each specific user query to the most appropriate catalogue. Examines 2 important USA projects for cataloguing network resources: Digital Libraries Research (funded by the National Science Foundation), which uses a combination of search engines to retrieve net data; and the Internet Public Library. Lists the Management and Library Schools now on the WWW
-
Vedaldi, M.; Nordio, T.: Un progetto di recupero automatico del pregresso (1995)
0.01
0.014018415 = product of:
0.11214732 = sum of:
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=2404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 2404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2404)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- The Political Sciences Library of the University of Padua completed in 1994 a pilot project to add all its book material purchased since 1970 (some 20.000 monographs) to its public online catalogue. The library decided against creating a parallel database, and to work instead directly thorugh its existing SBN base, thus avoiding duplication of authors and titles and saving time. Library of Congress tapes were acquired and a special rapid cataloguing software (RAP) was developed, written in natural-Adabas. Describes the project's methodology, problems and results
-
Bellei, M.: ¬Un catalogo 'ricco' (1998)
0.01
0.014018415 = product of:
0.11214732 = sum of:
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- To enhance descriptions, cataloguers can add 'enriching' words or phrases to titles, or introduce content-enriched access features to aid subject-based research. Additional and natural language subject headings designed to support, though not replace, controlled language headings can result in enhanced indexing. Analytical cataloguing and double indexing are 2 other means by which readers can gian access to additional bibliographic data. Also examines how online research tool effectiveness can be enhanced by a system of automatic links between descriptors
-
Dell'Orso, F.: Micro CDS/ISIS : analisi di un information retrieval system per personal computer (1995)
0.01
0.014018415 = product of:
0.11214732 = sum of:
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=2231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 2231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2231)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Continuing a previous article on CDS/ISIS Micro functions and procedures, illustrates other aspects by recapitulating the strong and weak points of the system. Defects include lack of user firendliness, the search and cataloguing functions, index management, and import/export. Favourable features are total file definition, the formatting language, alphabetical sorting, commands, and data transfer to/from other software environments. ISIS, developed by UNESCO, is a good product, and although demanding for the user, repays the effort made
-
Cheti, A.: L'indicizzazione per soggetto negli anni Novanta (1996)
0.01
0.013489546 = product of:
0.10791637 = sum of:
0.035972122 = product of:
0.071944244 = sum of:
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Considers the development in subject heading systems in Europe and America in recent years. Presents these developments in terms of the indexing languages used, the methods of subject analysis used, and the instruments comprised by the different systems (e.g. the rules governing the control of vocabulary and the construction of strings). Discusses the principles underlying the systems
-
Tartaglia, S.: ¬La sintassi delle stringhe di soggetto : metodo e principi (1997)
0.01
0.013489546 = product of:
0.10791637 = sum of:
0.035972122 = product of:
0.071944244 = sum of:
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Gives an account of the theoretical work underpinning the development of subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, as developed by the GRIS collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries. Discusses semantic categories and principles of citation, rules for the syntax of subject headings, and logica syntactic principles for citation order
