-
Imhof-Crämer, T.: Cataloguing in public libraries (1983)
0.04
0.039650064 = product of:
0.3172005 = sum of:
0.15860026 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15860026 = score(doc=224,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
1.111563 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
0.15860026 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15860026 = score(doc=224,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
1.111563 = fieldWeight in 224, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=224)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Source
- International cataloguing. 12(1983), S.31-33
-
Rider, A.F.: Rider's International Classification for the arrangement of books on the shelves of general libraries (1961)
0.01
0.0061900383 = product of:
0.09904061 = sum of:
0.09904061 = weight(_text_:author in 6162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09904061 = score(doc=6162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6396787 = fieldWeight in 6162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6162)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Imprint
- Middleton, Conn. : The-Author
-
Höppner, M.: Von der Dreigeteilten über die Zweigeteilte ins Kabinett (1996)
0.00
0.0033163952 = product of:
0.053062323 = sum of:
0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053062323 = score(doc=4290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 26. 2.1996 17:06:36
-
Beaujean, M.: Sacherschließung online : Eine Entgegnung (1991)
0.00
0.0033163952 = product of:
0.053062323 = sum of:
0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 7576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053062323 = score(doc=7576,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 7576, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7576)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 7. 4.2001 15:33:26
-
Kusber, E.: Ständige Aktualisierung von ASB und KAB : Zehn Jahre Systematik-Kooperati-on / Bibliotheken können jederzeit anfragen (2020)
0.00
0.0033163952 = product of:
0.053062323 = sum of:
0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 1779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053062323 = score(doc=1779,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 1779, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1779)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 10. 5.2013 16:33:26
-
Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986)
0.00
0.0018030355 = product of:
0.028848568 = sum of:
0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028848568 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
-
Hansson, J.: Framvaxten av 'Klassificationssystem for svenska bibliotek' mot bakgrund av folkbibliotekenes tidiga utveckling och aldre svensk klassifikationspraxis (1995)
0.00
0.0015454589 = product of:
0.024727343 = sum of:
0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727343 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Abstract
- Examines the events which led the Swedish Library Association (SAB) in 1921 to publish a unique Swedish classification system, the SAB system. Its origin is set in the social context of public library development since 1800 and seen in the light of Bostrom's philosophy of rational idealism. This had consequences for stock and classification practice in parish, workers' and study circle libraries. From 1915, SAB began debating classification at annual meetings and in the committee set up in 1917. Library consultants played a major role in the system's development; ahich was created for librarians, not users. The main reason for creating a unique system seems to have been a desire to find a common tool for stock acquisition and organisation which was based on Swedish practice and would function in the Swedish setting. This might explain why Dewey, based on American public library ideas, was rejected. But the picture is complex and can be differently interpretated
-
Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998)
0.00
0.0010869532 = product of:
0.017391251 = sum of:
0.017391251 = product of:
0.034782503 = sum of:
0.034782503 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034782503 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Source
- BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
-
Lorenz, B.: Systematische Aufstellung in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart (2002)
0.00
4.0760744E-4 = product of:
0.006521719 = sum of:
0.006521719 = product of:
0.013043438 = sum of:
0.013043438 = weight(_text_:22 in 1786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013043438 = score(doc=1786,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1786, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1786)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0625 = coord(1/16)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 17:56:19
