Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998) 0.14
    0.13933675 = product of:
      0.37156466 = sum of:
        0.07284182 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07284182 = score(doc=2535,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5105179 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.0381542 = product of:
          0.0763084 = sum of:
            0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0763084 = score(doc=2535,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08669108 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08669108 = score(doc=2535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.42318225 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.07284182 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07284182 = score(doc=2535,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5105179 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0763084 = score(doc=2535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    The work of Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing rules gave rise to a confernce in Toronto, Canada, in Oct 1997. some contributors elaborated on prepared texts about precise points concerning the evolution of rules in general, and those of the AACR in particular. The evolution of the notion of the catalogue and that of the practice of cataloguing were the focus of contributions and debates at an electronic forum set up specially for the occasion. Synthesizes the topics discussed including: hypertext navigation within the body of catalogues or documents, the creation of metadata included in the electronic documents themselves, the evolution of the notion of authority, and the advent of a set of universal characters permitting liberation from the problems of transliteration
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Cataloguing formats and standards
  2. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.07
    0.07267116 = product of:
      0.29068464 = sum of:
        0.09812891 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09812891 = score(doc=917,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6877445 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.09812891 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09812891 = score(doc=917,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6877445 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic documents are creating new services and generating new demands, with consequent impacts on the means of transmitting knowledge, international standards and democratisation of access. Universal bibliographic control depends on common rules for bibliographic description and format to ensure compatibility and exchange. In addition to ISBN and UNIMARC for cataloguing, Z39.50 allows searching of heterogeneous databases and SGML makes cataloguing in publication a reality. Such developments must be based on knowledge of what users want and their real search and consultation practices, not what the system devisers have the technology to create
    Content
    Presentation given at a French Librarians Association study day on 'The future of cataloguing / Catalogues of the future', held in June 1996 at the BNF
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Nine months later (the future of cataloguing)
  3. Gaschignard, J.-P.: UNIMARC et UNIMARC : attention aux contrefacons (1997) 0.02
    0.019825032 = product of:
      0.15860026 = sum of:
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=921,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=921,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    UNIMARC is widely used in French libraries for internal cataloguing, but in versions that differ significantly from the official IFLA form, while the BNF uses its own version for exporting bibliographic information. This situation has in part been created by software suppliers who produce modified versions for small libraries but without precisely detailing the variations. Problems will inevitably arise when such libraries change software or join cataloguing networks
  4. Bourdon, F.: Qu'est-ce qu'un format d'autorité? (1997) 0.01
    0.012266113 = product of:
      0.09812891 = sum of:
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Authority records complement bibliographic records, providing cataloguers with essential subject heading and related information. At present there is no international format standard comparable to ISBD for bibliographic records, though IFLA and the International Archives Council have set up working groups. The essential data form comprises of subject heading, structure, homonyms, with supplementary supporting information. In France MARC formats are most widely used, e.g. UNIMARC(A) for authority records and (B) for bibliographic. The National Library (BNF) is introducing new cataloguing software based on the reorganisation of its authotity files, using integrated INTERMARC. As an experiments, readers will for the first time have access to authority files, thus enriching, completing and clarifying the bibliographic records
  5. Passin-Aguirre, N.; Leresche, F.: ¬Le format INTERMARC integre : futur format de travail de la BNF (1997) 0.01
    0.012266113 = product of:
      0.09812891 = sum of:
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    The French National Library (NBF) has developed 2 new versions of INTERMARC, (A) and (B), to standardise cataloguing procedures and enrich bibliographic description and access. The bibliographic description format (B) accords with existing ISBD and can be used for all types of documents, allowing inclusion of specific characteristics and addition of new links. The format for editing records (A) eliminates redundancies and enriches links between fields. Both will be used as reference formats in the new Information System
  6. Duclos-Faure, D.: Format d'echange des donnees locales : ou en sommes-nous? (1997) 0.00
    0.0048663095 = product of:
      0.07786095 = sum of:
        0.07786095 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07786095 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4331851 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Since Sep 1996 a group with representatives from the French National Library (BNF), French Joint Catalogue (CCF), Directorate of Scientific and Technical Information (DISTNB), Directorate of Reading (DL) and the Higher Education Bibliography Agency (ABES) has been working on establishing a format for exchanging local data which will accomodtae the needs of all users; conform to international standards and take account of new technological tools (Z39.50-1995). Using pre-existing formats with UNIMARC as the basis, the new format will allow selection of documents by different location criteria, establish conditions of communication and manage interlibrary loan. To date fields have been defined for data on location and management of copies, and for descriptive data on copies
  7. Lupovici, C.: ¬L'¬information secondaire du document primaire : format MARC ou SGML? (1997) 0.00
    0.0048663095 = product of:
      0.07786095 = sum of:
        0.07786095 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07786095 = score(doc=892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4331851 = fieldWeight in 892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=892)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    Secondary information, e.g. MARC based bibliographic records, comprises structured data for identifying, tagging, retrieving and management of primary documents. SGML, the standard format for coding content and structure of primary documents, was introduced in 1986 as a publishing tool but is now being applied to bibliographic records. SGML now comprises standard definitions (DTD) for books, serials, articles and mathematical formulae. A simplified version (HTML) is used for Web pages. Pilot projects to develop SGML as a standard for bibliographic exchange include the Dublin Core, listing 13 descriptive elements for Internet documents; the French GRISELI programme using SGML for exchanging grey literature and US experiments on reformatting USMARC for use with SGML-based records
  8. SiBiL: Système intégré pour les bibliothèques universitaires de Lausanne : 9 années d'automatisation à la Bibliothèque cantonale et universitaire (1980) 0.00
    0.001934564 = product of:
      0.030953024 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    26. 6.1996 16:38:15