-
Lupovici, C.: Standards and electronic publishing (1996)
0.03
0.027660415 = product of:
0.14752221 = sum of:
0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 5869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035374884 = score(doc=5869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 5869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5869)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=5869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 5869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5869)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=5869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 5869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5869)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Date
- 1. 7.1996 21:26:02
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 25(1996) no.2, 39-42
-
Björklund, L.: Document description in the future (1992)
0.02
0.023596823 = product of:
0.12584972 = sum of:
0.035972122 = product of:
0.071944244 = sum of:
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=5939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071944244 = score(doc=5939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.017933354 = product of:
0.035866708 = sum of:
0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035866708 = score(doc=5939,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Proposes a combination of markup (e.g. SGML), natural language processing and artificial intelligence techniques for document description and information retrieval of primary scientific writings. By using markup to code parts of the documents while producing them, natural language techniques to understand them and rules and plans to pick up the most important parts of the documents, then tailored information packages could be created at different levels
- Source
- Technology and competence. Proc. of the 8th Nordic Conference on Information and Documentation, Helsingborg, 19-21 May 1992. Ed.: K. Adler et al
-
Björk, B.-C.: ¬The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles : a failed experiment? (2012)
0.02
0.018896027 = product of:
0.10077881 = sum of:
0.049520306 = weight(_text_:author in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049520306 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026531162 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727343 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Since 2004, mainstream scholarly publishers have been offering authors publishing in their subscription journals the option to free their individual articles from access barriers against a payment (hybrid OA). This has been marketed as a possible gradual transition path between subscription and open access to the scholarly journal literature, and the publishers have pledged to decrease their subscription prices in proportion to the uptake of the hybrid option. The number of hybrid journals has doubled in the past couple of years and is now over 4,300; the number of such articles was around 12,000 in 2011. On average only 1-2% of eligible authors utilize the OA option, due mainly to the generally high price level of typically 3,000 USD. There are, however, a few publishers and individual journals with a much higher uptake. This article takes a closer look at the development of hybrid OA and discusses, from an author-centric viewpoint, the possible reasons for the lack of success of this business model.
- Date
- 26. 8.2012 13:14:49
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.8, S.1496-1504
-
Coombs, J.H.; Renear, A.H.; DeRose, S.J.: Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing (1987)
0.02
0.016705828 = product of:
0.13364662 = sum of:
0.11122993 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11122993 = score(doc=593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6188358 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
0.022416692 = product of:
0.044833384 = sum of:
0.044833384 = weight(_text_:ed in 593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044833384 = score(doc=593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39288494 = fieldWeight in 593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- An influential analysis of text-markup systems and arguments for the use of descriptive markup in machine-readable texts
- Footnote
- Reprinted in: The digital world: text-based computing in the humanities. Ed.: G. Landow et al. Cambridge: MIT Pr. 1993, S.85-118
-
Marcoux, Y.; Sevigny, M.: Why SGML? Why now? (1997)
0.02
0.015244218 = product of:
0.12195374 = sum of:
0.088983946 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088983946 = score(doc=385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.49506867 = fieldWeight in 385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=385)
0.03296979 = weight(_text_:american in 385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03296979 = score(doc=385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.30134758 = fieldWeight in 385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=385)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Provides an introduction and overview to the basics of the SGML. Details the nature of SGML, discusses the need for descriptive markup and its evolution, and compares it with Open Document Architecture highlighting the differences between them and the reasons for the success of SGML. Concludes that currently the cost benefit ratio of SGML is high. Includes examples of SGML compliant software products
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.7, S.584-592
-
Nelson, G.M.; Eggett, D.L.: Citations, mandates, and money : author motivations to publish in chemistry hybrid open access journals (2017)
0.02
0.0151613485 = product of:
0.080860525 = sum of:
0.04668819 = weight(_text_:author in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04668819 = score(doc=3838,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.30154744 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
0.017687442 = weight(_text_:26 in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017687442 = score(doc=3838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.15607277 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
0.016484896 = weight(_text_:american in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016484896 = score(doc=3838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.15067379 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- Hybrid open access refers to articles freely accessible via the Internet but which originate from an academic journal that provides most of its content via subscription. The effect of hybrid open access on citation counts and author behavior in the field of chemistry is something that has not been widely studied. We compared 814 open access articles and 27,621 subscription access articles published from 2006 through 2011 in American Chemical Society journals. As expected, the 2 comparison groups are not equal in all respects. Cumulative citation data were analyzed from years 2-5 following an article's publication date. A citation advantage for open access articles was correlated with the journal impact factor (IF) in low and medium IF journals, but not in high IF journals. Open access articles have a 24% higher mean citation rate than their subscription counterparts in low IF journals (confidence limits 8-42%, p = .0022) and similarly, a 26% higher mean citation rate in medium IF journals (confidence limits 14-40%, p < .001). Open access articles in high IF journals had no significant difference compared to subscription access articles (13% lower mean citation rate, confidence limits -27-3%, p = .10). These results are correlative, not causative, and may not be completely due to an open access effect. Authors of the open access articles were also surveyed to determine why they chose a hybrid open access option, paid the required article processing charge, and whether they believed it was money well spent. Authors primarily chose open access because of funding mandates; however, most considered the money well spent because open access increases information access to the scientific community and the general public, and potentially increases citations to their scholarship.
-
Herwijnen, E. van: Practical SGML (1994)
0.02
0.015050705 = product of:
0.12040564 = sum of:
0.08934415 = weight(_text_:2nd in 827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08934415 = score(doc=827,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.49606967 = fieldWeight in 827, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=827)
0.031061485 = product of:
0.06212297 = sum of:
0.06212297 = weight(_text_:ed in 827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06212297 = score(doc=827,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.5443974 = fieldWeight in 827, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=827)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Shows how, by using SGML, documents can be interchanged and processed on many different systems in many different ways. The book is an extended revision and update of the 1st ed. with greater emphasis and focus on helping novices work their way through the vast amounts of information required to become proficient in DGML
- Footnote
- 1st ed. 1990
- Issue
- 2nd ed.
-
Guidon, J.; Pierre, S.: Hypertext and hypermedia for the production and utilization of interactive and distributed documents (1995)
0.01
0.014018415 = product of:
0.11214732 = sum of:
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=3754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 3754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3754)
0.05607366 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05607366 = score(doc=3754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.39299685 = fieldWeight in 3754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3754)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- The convergence of different fields, regrouping computer networks, multimedia, hypertext and new powerful software interfaces bring fresh approaches to the production, cataloguing and access of electronic documents. Hypertext organization brings the possibility of reading the document or navigating in a non-linear fashion. This will fundamentally alter reading, writing and publishing in future generations
-
Dalen, H.P. van; Henkens, K.: Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture : a worldwide survey (2012)
0.01
0.013927303 = product of:
0.111418426 = sum of:
0.08669108 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08669108 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.42318225 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024727343 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- How does publication pressure in modern-day universities affect the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards in science? By using a worldwide survey among demographers in developed and developing countries, the authors show that the large majority perceive the publication pressure as high, but more so in Anglo-Saxon countries and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. However, scholars see both the pros (upward mobility) and cons (excessive publication and uncitedness, neglect of policy issues, etc.) of the so-called publish-or-perish culture. By measuring behavior in terms of reading and publishing, and perceived extrinsic rewards and stated intrinsic rewards of practicing science, it turns out that publication pressure negatively affects the orientation of demographers towards policy and knowledge sharing. There are no signs that the pressure affects reading and publishing outside the core discipline.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1282-1293
-
Kelly, R.A.: Digital archiving the physics literature : Author to archive and beyond. The American Physical Society (1997)
0.01
0.01346761 = product of:
0.10774088 = sum of:
0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05777369 = score(doc=804,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 804, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=804)
0.04996719 = weight(_text_:american in 804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04996719 = score(doc=804,freq=6.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4567057 = fieldWeight in 804, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=804)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- The American Physical Society has long recognized as its goal the diffusion of the knowledge of physics. For the past 100 years, the society has used a paper based, print oriented publishing process in support of their goal. Describes the strategies and projects being developed and implemented, that will enable the exploitation of the emerging Internet and electronic publishing technologies in support of the Society's goal
- Footnote
- Paper presented at Concurrent Session 3: The electronic physics literature at the forefront of change, of the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc. 11th annual conference, 20-23 Jun 96, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
-
Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998)
0.01
0.0126410425 = product of:
0.10112834 = sum of:
0.075041465 = weight(_text_:26 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075041465 = score(doc=2356,freq=4.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.6621607 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
0.026086876 = product of:
0.052173752 = sum of:
0.052173752 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052173752 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Date
- 23.10.1996 17:26:29
12.12.1998 12:26:24
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
-
Sutton, B.: Toward world literature in electronic formats : three promising technical development (1994)
0.01
0.012266113 = product of:
0.09812891 = sum of:
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049064454 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Examined 3 technical advances that may hasten the day when electronic representations of literary texts will be a regular part of library service: the network delivery of electronic texts, extended character codes, and markup language. Problems in the creation and dissemination of electronic texts include intellectual property issues, retrospective conversion of printed texts to electronic form, the establishment of archives and the need for alternative cataloguing procedures for the new media. Efforts are being made to extend ASCII character codes in order to be able to represent fully all the forms of wrting found in the world's languages, and use of SGML will enable important aspects of a books's structural organisation to be retained in its electronic form
-
Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017)
0.01
0.011747589 = product of:
0.06265381 = sum of:
0.017986061 = product of:
0.035972122 = sum of:
0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035972122 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035972122 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.008695626 = product of:
0.017391251 = sum of:
0.017391251 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017391251 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
-
Popham, M.: Text encoding, analysis, and retrieval (1996)
0.01
0.011694079 = product of:
0.093552634 = sum of:
0.07786095 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 6604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07786095 = score(doc=6604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.4331851 = fieldWeight in 6604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6604)
0.015691686 = product of:
0.031383373 = sum of:
0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 6604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031383373 = score(doc=6604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 6604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Reviews the processes available for creating and encoding electronic texts and the availability and types of text analysis and retrieval software. Considers the main elements involved in text encoding; preparation; scanning; keying; reusing electronic texts from archives, such as the Oxford Text Archive (http://ota.ox.ac.uk/~archive.ota.html) and the Electronic Text Center at Virginia University (http://www.lib.virginia.edu/etext/ETC.html); encoding standards; markup; prescriptive versus descriptive approaches; proprietary and non proprietary markup and encoding schemes; PostScript; portable electronic documents; SGML; and the Text Encoding Initiative. Concludes with a review of computer aided text analysis and of text analysis and retrieval software with note on aids to finding information online via the Internet and WWW
- Source
- New technologies for the humanities. Ed.: C. Mullins et al
-
Bradley, N.: SGML concepts (1992)
0.01
0.01011716 = product of:
0.08093728 = sum of:
0.026979093 = product of:
0.053958185 = sum of:
0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053958185 = score(doc=5917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 5917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053958185 = score(doc=5917,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 5917, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5917)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- The abbreviation SGML stands for Standard Generalized Markup Language. Markup refers to adding style and formatting information to text prior to publication. It is a standard because SGML has been accepted and published by the ISO, and is not owned by any manufacturer or software vendor. It is generalized because SGML is powerful and flexible, allowing it to be used in many applications. And it is a language that embodies a specification for creation of a set of rules to define the structure of a document. SGML has been designed to easily cross incompatible computer platforms, and its 'open' nature allows for relatively simple access and manipulation of an SGML conforming document by both people and computers. Above all, SGML proposes a new way of thinking about document creation and presentation, by shifting document style considerations to the publication process rather than the creation process. This is done by dividing the document into names, logical elements, to which any style can be later applied. A byproduct of this approach is the effective creation of a flexible database, providing further access to the data for information retrieval or for re-publication
-
Nobarany, S.; Booth, K.S.: Understanding and supporting anonymity policies in peer review (2017)
0.01
0.01011716 = product of:
0.08093728 = sum of:
0.026979093 = product of:
0.053958185 = sum of:
0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053958185 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.053958185 = weight(_text_:rules in 3533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053958185 = score(doc=3533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.33386347 = fieldWeight in 3533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3533)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Design of peer-review support systems is shaped by the policies that define and govern the process of peer review. An important component of these are policies that deal with anonymity: The rules that govern the concealment and transparency of information related to identities of the various stakeholders (authors, reviewers, editors, and others) involved in the peer-review process. Anonymity policies have been a subject of debate for several decades within scholarly communities. Because of widespread criticism of traditional peer-review processes, a variety of new peer-review processes have emerged that manage the trade-offs between disclosure and concealment of identities in different ways. Based on an analysis of policies and guidelines for authors and reviewers provided by publication venues, we developed a framework for understanding how disclosure and concealment of identities is managed. We discuss the appropriate role of information technology and computer support for the peer-review process within that framework.
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.01
0.010047179 = product of:
0.053584956 = sum of:
0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022109302 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02060612 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.010869532 = product of:
0.021739064 = sum of:
0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021739064 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1875 = coord(3/16)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
- Date
- 27. 7.2011 20:55:26
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1614-1628
-
Rodrigues, R.S.; Abadal, E.: Scientific journals in Brazil and Spain : alternative publishing models (2014)
0.01
0.009506433 = product of:
0.076051466 = sum of:
0.049520306 = weight(_text_:author in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049520306 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026531162 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- This paper describes high-quality journals in Brazil and Spain, with an emphasis on the distribution models used. It presents the general characteristics (age, type of publisher, and theme) and analyzes the distribution model by studying the type of format (print or digital), the type of access (open access or subscription), and the technology platform used. The 549 journals analyzed (249 in Brazil and 300 in Spain) are included in the 2011 Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. Data on each journal were collected directly from their websites between March and October 2012. Brazil has a fully open access distribution model (97%) in which few journals require payment by authors thanks to cultural, financial, operational, and technological support provided by public agencies. In Spain, open access journals account for 55% of the total and have also received support from public agencies, although to a lesser extent. These results show that there are systems support of open access in scientific journals other than the "author pays" model advocated by the Finch report for the United Kingdom.
- Date
- 26. 9.2014 20:28:06
-
Nguyen, T.-L.; Wu, X.; Sajeev, S.: Object-oriented modeling of multimedia documents (1998)
0.01
0.0091238795 = product of:
0.072991036 = sum of:
0.05777369 = weight(_text_:author in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05777369 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.3731459 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.015217344 = product of:
0.030434689 = sum of:
0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030434689 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Describes an object-oriented model for paper-based multimedia documents such as textbook with embedded graphics. This model is the 1st step towards building a manageable authoring system for the Web, in which documents can be easily built, extended, truncated, reordered, assembled and disassembled on a computer basis, and the document components, can be reused. The model will also make accessible properties, which might be significant or important to the user, especially in searching or classifying documents, such as the document title and author. Explains the model design and presents the class hierarchy for the model
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016)
0.01
0.008430966 = product of:
0.06744773 = sum of:
0.022482576 = product of:
0.04496515 = sum of:
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04496515 = weight(_text_:rules in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04496515 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.032090448 = queryNorm
0.27821955 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
0.125 = coord(2/16)
- Abstract
- Scholars writing books that are widely used to support teaching in higher education may be undervalued because of a lack of evidence of teaching value. Although sales data may give credible evidence for textbooks, these data may poorly reflect educational uses of other types of books. As an alternative, this article proposes a method to search automatically for mentions of books in online academic course syllabi based on Bing searches for syllabi mentioning a given book, filtering out false matches through an extensive set of rules. The method had an accuracy of over 90% based on manual checks of a sample of 2,600 results from the initial Bing searches. Over one third of about 14,000 monographs checked had one or more academic syllabus mention, with more in the arts and humanities (56%) and social sciences (52%). Low but significant correlations between syllabus mentions and citations across most fields, except the social sciences, suggest that books tend to have different levels of impact for teaching and research. In conclusion, the automatic syllabus search method gives a new way to estimate the educational utility of books in a way that sales data and citation counts cannot.
