Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Cope, J.: Librarianship as intellectual craft : the ethics of classification in the realms of leisure and waged labor (2012) 0.02
    0.022353057 = product of:
      0.11921631 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
        0.055840094 = weight(_text_:2nd in 421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055840094 = score(doc=421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31004354 = fieldWeight in 421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=421)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    This paper develops an ethical conception of library labor as an intellectual craft that can serve as an alternative to a deterministic discourse of technological transformation. In this paper, the author proposes a model of librarianship as an intellectual craft that can be used as an "ideal type" in comparison to recent transformations in the practice of librarianship. This paper then examines the rise of participatory classification in the realm of leisure in user-generated classification schemes (e.g., folksonomies) as a way of examining some of the difficult ethical questions that this ideal of intellectual craft poses when applied to contemporary conditions. Marx's concept of surplus value is used to examine how donated labor adds to the general knowledge. This paper concludes by advocating for the general expansion of leisure coupled with the promotion public institutions that support the craft of those who organize information in a broadly defined public interest. In an era of dramatic change, such a framework offers a positive ethical account of librarians and information professionals' labor that is not wholly dependent on a discourse of market exchange.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_g.pdf.
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:26:04
  2. Peterson, E.: Parallel systems : the coexistence of subject cataloging and folksonomy (2008) 0.01
    0.011803353 = product of:
      0.094426826 = sum of:
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have always had to balance adherence to cataloging rules and authority files with creating cataloging that is current and relevant to users. That dilemma has been complicated in new ways because of user demands in the world of Web 2.0. Standardized cataloging is crucial for communication between computer systems, but patrons now have an expectation of social interaction on the Internet, as evidenced by the popularity of folksonomy. After a description of traditional subject cataloging and folksonomy, this article discusses several institutions where subject cataloging is still used, but where patron interaction is also encouraged. User-generated tags can coexist with controlled vocabulary such as subject headings.
  3. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01
    0.009427879 = product of:
      0.07542303 = sum of:
        0.031267278 = weight(_text_:26 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031267278 = score(doc=2650,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.2759003 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
        0.044155754 = sum of:
          0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022416692 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021739064 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:34:26
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.009408709 = product of:
      0.07526967 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
        0.05316037 = sum of:
          0.022416692 = weight(_text_:ed in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022416692 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.19644247 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.030743679 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030743679 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Munk, T.B.; Mork, K.: Folksonomy, the power law & the significance of the least effort (2007) 0.01
    0.0077724275 = product of:
      0.12435884 = sum of:
        0.12435884 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12435884 = score(doc=663,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6918795 = fieldWeight in 663, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=663)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    The essence of folksonomies is user-created descriptive metadata as opposed to the traditional sender-determined descriptive metadata in taxonomies and faceted classification. We briefly introduce the beginning and principles of folksonomy and discuss the categorizing concept of folksonomies on the basis of the computer program del.icio.us. The selection of the metadata tagged is not accidental, rather tagging follows a pattern that proves to be the pattern for the classic power law, which, in many complex systems is seen to unfold as an imitation-dynamic that creates an asymmetry, where a few descriptive metadata are often reproduced and the majority seldom reproduced. In del.icio.us, it is the very broad and basic subject headings that are often reproduced and achieve power in the system - which in cognitive psychology is called cognitive basic categories - while the small, more specific subject headings are seldom reproduced. The law of power's underlying imitation-dynamic in del.icio.us is explained from the perspective of different theoretical paradigms, i.e. network, economy and cognition. The theorectical and speculative conclusion is that the law of power and asymmetry is biased by a cognitive economizing through a simplification principle in the users construction of descriptive metadata. Free tagging in folksonomies is comparable to empirical experiments in free categorization. Users often choose broad basic categories, because that requires the least cognitive effort. The consequences are that folksonomy is not necessarily a better, more realistic and cheaper method of creating metadata than that which can be generated through taxonomies, faceted classification or search algorithms. Folksonomy as a self-organizing system likely cannot create better and cheaper descriptive metadata.
  6. Huvila, I.: Aesthetic judgments in folksonomies as criteria for organising knowledge 0.01
    0.0058305888 = product of:
      0.04664471 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=3540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
        0.015691686 = product of:
          0.031383373 = sum of:
            0.031383373 = weight(_text_:ed in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031383373 = score(doc=3540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.27501947 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  7. Goodrum, A.; Hibbard, C.E.; Fels, C.D.; Woodcock, C.K.: ¬The creation of keysigns : American sign language metadata (2008) 0.00
    0.00477217 = product of:
      0.03817736 = sum of:
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2272)
        0.013450016 = product of:
          0.026900033 = sum of:
            0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 2272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026900033 = score(doc=2272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 2272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  8. Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.00
    0.0032978836 = product of:
      0.026383068 = sum of:
        0.017687442 = weight(_text_:26 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017687442 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.15607277 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
        0.008695626 = product of:
          0.017391251 = sum of:
            0.017391251 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017391251 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    Source
    Bergische Landeszeitung. Nr.83 vom 7.4.2007, S.26
  9. Park, H.: ¬A conceptual framework to study folksonomic interaction (2011) 0.00
    0.0025791824 = product of:
      0.04126692 = sum of:
        0.04126692 = weight(_text_:author in 4852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04126692 = score(doc=4852,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26653278 = fieldWeight in 4852, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4852)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework to recast a folksonomy as a Web classification and to use this to explore the ways in which people work with it in assessing, sharing, and navigating Web resources. The author uses information scent and foraging theory as a context to discuss how folksonomy is constructed through interactions among users, a folksonomic system, and a given domain that consists of a group of users who share the same interest or goals. The discussion centers on two dimensions of folksonomies: (1) folksonomy as a Web classification which puts like information together in a Web context; and (2) folksonomy as information scent which helps users to find related resources and users, and obtain desired information. This paper aims to integrate these two dimensions with a conceptual framework that addresses the structure of a folksonomy shaped by users' interactions. A proposed framework consists of three components of users' interactions with a folksonomy: (a) tagging - cognitive categorization of Web accessible resources by an individual user; (b) navigation - exploration and discovery of Web accessible resources in the folksonomic system; and (c) knowledge sharing - representation and communication of knowledge within a domain. This understanding will help us motivate possible future directions of research in folksonomy. This initial framework will frame a number of research questions and help lay the groundwork for future empirical research which focuses on qualitative analysis of a folksonomy and users' tagging behaviors.
  10. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2007) 0.00
    0.001934564 = product of:
      0.030953024 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    30. 6.2007 20:26:27
  11. Schwartz, C.: Thesauri and facets and tags, Oh my! : a look at three decades in subject analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.001934564 = product of:
      0.030953024 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 5566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=5566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5566)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 18:55:26
  12. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.00
    0.0016304298 = product of:
      0.026086876 = sum of:
        0.026086876 = product of:
          0.052173752 = sum of:
            0.052173752 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052173752 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  13. Furner, J.: Folksonomies (2009) 0.00
    0.0015850996 = product of:
      0.025361594 = sum of:
        0.025361594 = product of:
          0.050723188 = sum of:
            0.050723188 = weight(_text_:ed in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050723188 = score(doc=3857,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.4444986 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  14. Bar-Ilan, J.; Belous, Y.: Children as architects of Web directories : an exploratory study (2007) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=289,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.895-907
  15. Pera, M.S.; Lund, W.; Ng, Y.-K.: ¬A sophisticated library search strategy using folksonomies and similarity matching (2009) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=2939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.7, S.1392-1406
  16. Kim, H.H.: Toward video semantic search based on a structured folksonomy (2011) 0.00
    0.0012878824 = product of:
      0.02060612 = sum of:
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.3, S.478-492
  17. Spiteri, L.: ¬The structure and form of folksonomy tags : the road to the public library catalogue (2007) 0.00
    0.0011208346 = product of:
      0.017933354 = sum of:
        0.017933354 = product of:
          0.035866708 = sum of:
            0.035866708 = weight(_text_:ed in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866708 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.31430796 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Source
    ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
  18. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.00
    9.51084E-4 = product of:
      0.015217344 = sum of:
        0.015217344 = product of:
          0.030434689 = sum of:
            0.030434689 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030434689 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  19. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.00
    8.152149E-4 = product of:
      0.013043438 = sum of:
        0.013043438 = product of:
          0.026086876 = sum of:
            0.026086876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026086876 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.0625 = coord(1/16)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22