Search (139 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.18
    0.17515546 = product of:
      0.35031092 = sum of:
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.04956258 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04956258 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3473634 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.03894097 = product of:
          0.07788194 = sum of:
            0.07788194 = weight(_text_:rules in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07788194 = score(doc=190,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.48189044 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.07224257 = weight(_text_:anglo in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07224257 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3526519 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.029141452 = weight(_text_:american in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029141452 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26635614 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.04956258 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04956258 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3473634 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.07788194 = weight(_text_:rules in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07788194 = score(doc=190,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.48189044 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.010869532 = product of:
          0.021739064 = sum of:
            0.021739064 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021739064 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(8/16)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  2. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.16
    0.16271803 = product of:
      0.43391472 = sum of:
        0.114362255 = weight(_text_:author in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114362255 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7386374 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.09712243 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09712243 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6806905 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.035972122 = product of:
          0.071944244 = sum of:
            0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071944244 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.09712243 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09712243 = score(doc=3053,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6806905 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.071944244 = weight(_text_:rules in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071944244 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4451513 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.017391251 = product of:
          0.034782503 = sum of:
            0.034782503 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034782503 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    Examines in detail the author cataloguing practices adopted by the Italian National Library Service, as set out in its 1995 Cataloguing Guide (Guida SBN), and discusses how far these practices accord with the standard 1979 RICA author cataloguing rules. Since the author headings prescribed by RICA include personal names, corporate names and titles, this survey looks at all such SBN catalogue entries having an access point function. Presents many examples of standard and variant forms of heading, and reviews control procedures
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  3. Tillett, B.B.: ¬A summary of the treatment of bibliographic relationships in cataloguing rules (1991) 0.16
    0.156311 = product of:
      0.5001952 = sum of:
        0.088983946 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088983946 = score(doc=6739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49506867 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
        0.11214732 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11214732 = score(doc=6739,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7859937 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
        0.06230555 = product of:
          0.1246111 = sum of:
            0.1246111 = weight(_text_:rules in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1246111 = score(doc=6739,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.7710247 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.11214732 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11214732 = score(doc=6739,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7859937 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
        0.1246111 = weight(_text_:rules in 6739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1246111 = score(doc=6739,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7710247 = fieldWeight in 6739, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6739)
      0.3125 = coord(5/16)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on an analytical study to examine the cataloguing rules in AACR2 to reveal practices for indicating bibliographic relationships in cataloguing records and identify types of relationships. Relationships defined and investigated were: equivalence; derivative; descriptive; whole-part; accompanying; sequential; and shared characteristic relationships.Each type of bibliographic relationship has had several linking devices used to connect bibliographic entities. The technology available to create and maintain a catalogue has greatly influenced the types of linking devices included in the catalogue and prescribed in cataloguing rules
  4. Hedman, T.: Utkast till en deskriptiv teori for katalogsokning / informationsatervinning (1997) 0.15
    0.14963032 = product of:
      0.3990142 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.13485913 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13485913 = score(doc=1428,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7502986 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=1428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=1428,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    Library information searching lacks a descriptive theory which explains how a user decides to borrow one book and not another. Such theory should act as a reference framework against which cataloguing rules and the classification system can be measured, and should be based on 2 complementary perspectives, described in detail: modern classification theory, which explains what cataloguing and classification involve, and philosophy of science, which explains what happens when the user meets the catalogue record. Catalogue information must answer which work is described, and why this work on the subject is chosen. A descriptive theory is especially necessary for knowing what new information to add to the catalogue. Discusses this in a subsequent article
    Date
    26. 7.1996 19:42:42
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Draft of a descriptive theory of catalogue searching / information retrieval
  5. Desrichard, Y.: ¬Les formats et normes de catalogage : evolutions et perspectives (1998) 0.14
    0.13933675 = product of:
      0.37156466 = sum of:
        0.07284182 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07284182 = score(doc=2535,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5105179 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.0381542 = product of:
          0.0763084 = sum of:
            0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0763084 = score(doc=2535,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08669108 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08669108 = score(doc=2535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.42318225 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024727343 = score(doc=2535,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.07284182 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07284182 = score(doc=2535,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5105179 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
        0.0763084 = weight(_text_:rules in 2535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0763084 = score(doc=2535,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.47215426 = fieldWeight in 2535, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2535)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    The work of Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing rules gave rise to a confernce in Toronto, Canada, in Oct 1997. some contributors elaborated on prepared texts about precise points concerning the evolution of rules in general, and those of the AACR in particular. The evolution of the notion of the catalogue and that of the practice of cataloguing were the focus of contributions and debates at an electronic forum set up specially for the occasion. Synthesizes the topics discussed including: hypertext navigation within the body of catalogues or documents, the creation of metadata included in the electronic documents themselves, the evolution of the notion of authority, and the advent of a set of universal characters permitting liberation from the problems of transliteration
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Cataloguing formats and standards
  6. Eversberg, B.: Zur Katalogpolitik der alten Hochschulbibliotheken : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1978) 0.14
    0.13579834 = product of:
      0.3621289 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=368,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.054517355 = product of:
          0.10903471 = sum of:
            0.10903471 = weight(_text_:rules in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10903471 = score(doc=368,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.6746466 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.069387615 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069387615 = score(doc=368,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4863088 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
        0.10903471 = weight(_text_:rules in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10903471 = score(doc=368,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.6746466 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    After a long delay the final edition of RAK has been published. The old university libraries have suffered for years from using the Prussian Instructions which are obsolete and time-consuming; they have hesitated to give their old catalogues up but should do so as soon as possible. A new cataloguing policy is now needed, moving away from traditional practices that still govern even RAK towards simplified rules suitable for future developments such as use in centralised regional catalogues and in automated data processing. Simplified rules are proposed and discussed in relation to American and British minimal cataloguing, with suggestions for changes in basic terminology, general rules, main and subordinate entries, personal name and corporate body entries and subject headings
    Source
    DFW. 26(1978) H.6, S.229-234,236
  7. Panchyshyn, R.S.; Park, A.L.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) database enrichment : the path to a hybridized catalog (2015) 0.12
    0.12095396 = product of:
      0.3225439 = sum of:
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.1011396 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1011396 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49371263 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the benefits of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) enrichment project for libraries. Enrichment projects "hybridize", or enrich legacy Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) bibliographic records with RDA data. Until a replacement for MARC is developed, bibliographic data will continue to be encoded in MARC 21 in many integrated library systems. Library catalogs contain records coded under both AACR2 and RDA standards. RDA enrichment projects benefit the patron experience because the data is cleaner and more consistent for patron use and display, cataloging staff workflows are simplified, and the consistency of the data is advantageous for system development and data exchange with other communities
  8. Tillett, B.B.: RDA, or, The long journey of the catalog to the digital age (2016) 0.12
    0.12095396 = product of:
      0.3225439 = sum of:
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.1011396 = weight(_text_:anglo in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1011396 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49371263 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
        0.028848568 = weight(_text_:american in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028848568 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.26367915 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
        0.049064454 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049064454 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.34387225 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    RDA was created in response to complaints about the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, especially the call for a more international, principle-based content standard that takes the perspective of the conceptual models of FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) and FRAD (Functional Requirements for Authority Data). The past and ongoing process for continuous improvement to RDA is through the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA (known as the JSC, but recently renamed the RDA Steering Committee - RSC) to make RDA even more international and principle-based.
  9. Frâncu, V.: ¬An interpretation of the FRBR model (2004) 0.12
    0.11920643 = product of:
      0.31788382 = sum of:
        0.08086632 = weight(_text_:author in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08086632 = score(doc=2647,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5222955 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.062692255 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062692255 = score(doc=2647,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.43938383 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.025436133 = product of:
          0.050872266 = sum of:
            0.050872266 = weight(_text_:rules in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050872266 = score(doc=2647,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.3147695 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.062692255 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062692255 = score(doc=2647,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.43938383 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.050872266 = weight(_text_:rules in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050872266 = score(doc=2647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3147695 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.035324603 = sum of:
          0.017933354 = weight(_text_:ed in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017933354 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.15715398 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.017391251 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017391251 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    Despite the existence of a logical structural model for bibliographic records which integrates any record type, library catalogues persist in offering catalogue records at the level of 'items'. Such records however, do not clearly indicate which works they contain. Hence the search possibilities of the end user are unduly limited. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) present through a conceptual model, independent of any cataloguing code or implementation, a globalized view of the bibliographic universe. This model, a synthesis of the existing cataloguing rules, consists of clearly structured entities and well defined types of relationships among them. From a theoretical viewpoint, the model is likely to be a good knowledge organiser with great potential in identifying the author and the work represented by an item or publication and is able to link different works of the author with different editions, translations or adaptations of those works aiming at better answering the user needs. This paper is presenting an interpretation of the FRBR model opposing it to a traditional bibliographic record of a complex library material.
    Content
    1. Introduction With the diversification of the material available in library collections such as: music, film, 3D objects, cartographic material and electronic resources like CD-ROMS and Web sites, the existing cataloguing principles and codes are no longer adequate to enable the user to find, identify, select and obtain a particular entity. The problem is not only that material fails to be appropriately represented in the catalogue records but also access to such material, or parts of it, is difficult if possible at all. Consequently, the need emerged to develop new rules and build up a new conceptual model able to cope with all the requirements demanded by the existing library material. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records developed by an IFLA Study Group from 1992 through 1997 present a generalised view of the bibliographic universe and are intended to be independent of any cataloguing code or implementation (Tillett, 2002). Outstanding scholars like Antonio Panizzi, Charles A. Cutter and Seymour Lubetzky formulated the basic cataloguing principles of which some can be retrieved, as Denton (2003) argues as updated versions, between the basic lines of the FRBR model: - the relation work-author groups all the works of an author - all the editions, translations, adaptations of a work are clearly separated (as expressions and manifestations) - all the expressions and manifestations of a work are collocated with their related works in bibliographic families - any document (manifestation and item) can be found if the author, title or subject of that document is known - the author is authorised by the authority control - the title is an intrinsic part of the work + authority control entity
    Date
    17. 6.2015 14:40:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  10. Wessel, H.-P.: RSWK und RAK - die Geschichte einer unendlichen Annäherung? (2005) 0.07
    0.06911655 = product of:
      0.1843108 = sum of:
        0.02803683 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02803683 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19649842 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
        0.017986061 = product of:
          0.035972122 = sum of:
            0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035972122 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.057794057 = weight(_text_:anglo in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057794057 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.2821215 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
        0.016484896 = weight(_text_:american in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016484896 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.15067379 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
        0.02803683 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02803683 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19649842 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
        0.035972122 = weight(_text_:rules in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035972122 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.22257565 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
      0.375 = coord(6/16)
    
    Abstract
    "Für die Schlagwortkatalogisierungsregeln ist im Bereich der Ansetzung von Personennamen, Körperschaftsnamen und Titeln, in denen sie sich mit den Formalkatalogisierungsregeln überlappen, eine Konformität mit diesen aus verschiedenen Gründen sehr wünschenswert, wenn nicht geboten."' Diese These von Peter Baader, seinerzeit Leiter der Abteilung Alphabetische Katalogisierung der Deutschen Bibliothek, stammt aus der Zeit vor dem Erscheinen der ersten Auflage (1986) der RSWK und ist heute immer noch genauso aktuell wie im Jahre 1983. Baader warnte vor einer "Zersplitterung" der jeweiligen Regelungen, konnte diese jedoch nicht verhindern, da die RSWK sich letztlich auf etablierte deutsche Schlagwortregelwerke und die Ergebnisse von Abstimmungen durch deutsche Bibliotheksverbünde und Einzelbibliotheken beriefen. Dies geschah nicht zuletzt, um die Akzeptanz der RSWK als neues Einheitsregelwerk zu erhöhen. Zwanzig Jahre später diskutiert die deutschsprachige bibliothekarische Fachwelt endlich ergebnisorientiert über die Angleichung von RAK und RSWK, jetzt allerdings unter Anpassung der RAK an Struktur und Inhalte der Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR) bzw. ihres Nachfolgers. Die folgende Darstellung unternimmt den Versuch, auf der Grundlage dieser Prämisse das Modell eines für die Formal- und Inhaltserschließung gemeinsamen deutschen Regelwerks zu skizzieren und die noch bestehenden Unterschiede zu dokumentieren. Zum besseren Verständnis des doch so langwierigen Annäherungsprozesses soll zunächst die bisherige Entwicklung betrachtet werden. Eckpunkte der Vorgeschichte - Die DBI-Kommission für Erschließung und Katalogmanagement (KEK) beschließt 1991 in ihrem Arbeitsprogramm den Abgleich beider Regelwerke und erklärt 1992 ihre Absicht, die Ansetzungen der Personennamen in RAK und RSWK zu harmonisieren. - Die Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge empfiehlt 1994 einheitliche Ansetzungsformen in RAK und RSWK für Personen- bzw. Körperschaftsnamen sowie eine umfassende Bestimmung von Einheitssachtiteln. - Die Expertengruppen RAK und RSWK beschließen 1996, dass bei der Ansetzung von Personen- und Körperschaftsnamen substanzielle Abweichungen zwischen den beiden Regelwerken vorläufig erhalten bleiben und stattdessen unterschiedliche Ansetzungsformen miteinander verknüpft werden sollen. Kurz nach dem Beginn der Diskussion über einen möglichen Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC 21, AACR2) fasst der Standardisierungsausschuss im Juni 2002 den Beschluss zur Angleichung von RAK und RSWK. Ausgangspunkt sollen die Ansetzungsformen von Personen und Körperschaften sein. Im Dezember 2002 wird von einem RAK-RSWK-Expertentreffen vorgeschlagen, bei Regeländerungen die AACR2 zu berücksichtigen, ein gemeinsames Datenformat für PND, GKD und SWD zu entwickeln, den Änderungsaufwand in den Normdateien abzuschätzen und einen Zeitplan für ein gestuftes Vorgehen bei den Regeländerungen zu entwickeln. Im Mai 2004 beschließen die Expertengruppen Formalerschließung, PND und RSWK/SWD bei getrennten und überwiegend unterschiedlichen Regelwerkstexten einheitliche Ansetzungsformen in RAK und RSWK für Personennamen. Der Standardisierungsausschuss erklärt seine Absicht, einen für Formal- und Inhaltserschließung gemeinsamen Regelwerkstext zu veröffentlichen. Im Januar 2005 wird von Vertretern der Expertengruppen ein von der Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung vorgelegtes Arbeitspaket "Gemeinsame Ansetzungsregeln für Körperschaften" (GKR) beschlossen. Im März 2005 legt die Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung ein Konzept zur Entwicklung eines gemeinsamen Normdatenformats vor.
  11. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: From bibliographic models to cataloguing rules : remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them (2009) 0.07
    0.066097766 = product of:
      0.26439106 = sum of:
        0.08498212 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08498212 = score(doc=2973,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5956042 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
        0.031475607 = product of:
          0.062951215 = sum of:
            0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062951215 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08498212 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08498212 = score(doc=2973,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5956042 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
        0.062951215 = weight(_text_:rules in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062951215 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.38950738 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the changes that are occurring in the world of cataloguing. It argues that these changes need to be coordinated. It also discusses the feature of current OPACs, FRBR, the Paris Principles and its proposed replacement (ICP), AACR2 and its proposed replacement (RDA), ISBD, and the relationships between and among these standards. It argues that the syntax of ISBD is an essential component of RDA and all future international and national cataloguing codes.
  12. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.05
    0.054947317 = product of:
      0.29305235 = sum of:
        0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053062323 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
        0.13401622 = weight(_text_:2nd in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13401622 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18010403 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.7441045 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6123877 = idf(docFreq=438, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
        0.10597382 = sum of:
          0.053800065 = weight(_text_:ed in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053800065 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.47146195 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.052173752 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052173752 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032090448 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Date
    26. 8.2005 15:12:32
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
    Issue
    2nd ed.
  13. Oddy, P.: ¬The case for international cooperation in cataloguing : from copy cataloguing to multilingual subject access - experiences within the British Library (1999) 0.05
    0.05365198 = product of:
      0.2861439 = sum of:
        0.035374884 = weight(_text_:26 in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035374884 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.12538451 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12538451 = score(doc=5181,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.87876767 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
        0.12538451 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12538451 = score(doc=5181,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.87876767 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Presents an outline of a cataloguing strategy that might be adopted for the with reference to how such a strategy is being implemented at the British Library. The first stage has involved cooperation with US libraries and future plans are linked to cooperation with European libraries. Such developments involve countries with different languages and different cataloguing cultures and so present many challenges. Discusses the skills required by staff needed to implement the cataloguing strategy
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:32:26
  14. Umstätter, W.; Wagner-Döbler, R.; Löffler, K.: Einführung in die Katalogkunde : Vom Zettelkatalog zur Suchmaschine (2005) 0.05
    0.052775193 = product of:
      0.12062901 = sum of:
        0.017523019 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017523019 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.12281151 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
        0.011241288 = product of:
          0.022482576 = sum of:
            0.022482576 = weight(_text_:rules in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022482576 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.13910978 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.036121286 = weight(_text_:anglo in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036121286 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20485519 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.17632595 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.3836813 = idf(docFreq=202, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
        0.01030306 = weight(_text_:american in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01030306 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.09417112 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
        0.017523019 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017523019 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.12281151 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
        0.022482576 = weight(_text_:rules in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022482576 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16161752 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.13910978 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.036312 = idf(docFreq=780, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
        0.005434766 = product of:
          0.010869532 = sum of:
            0.010869532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010869532 = score(doc=4880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11237528 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032090448 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4375 = coord(7/16)
    
    Abstract
    Die Katalogkunde von KARL LÖFFLER aus dem Jahre 1956 als Grundlage unserer Einführung kann einerseits als völlig veraltet angesehen werden, weil sie sich ausschließlich auf Kataloge bezieht, die auf Papier bzw. Karteikarten geschrieben waren. Die Fotographie und die Verwendung des Mikrofilms wurde damals als das Medium der Zukunft angesehen. Andererseits sind die Ausführungen der ersten und zweiten Auflage dieses Lehrbuchs von 1936 und 1956 insofern noch immer aktuell, als die Kataloge der damaligen Zeit inzwischen vielfach digitalisiert wurden und nun online verfügbar sind. Unter dem Stichwort Retrokonvertierung gewinnen die Katalogisierungsregeln der damaligen Zeit wieder Bedeutung oder bleiben sie wirksam. Und der Blick auf den geschichtlichen Kontext, den Löffler immer wieder hervorhebt, vermittelt unserer Meinung nach auch heute noch ein Gefühl für die historische Kontinuität der Probleme, die wir heute unter die Begriffe Wissensorganisation und Wissensmanagement subsumieren. «Die Unkenntnis der Lehre vom Katalog rächt sich am Bibliotheksbesucher selbst», schreibt LÖFFLER in seinem Vorwort von 1935, und wir können heute ergänzen, dass diese Besucher weitaus häufiger Nutzer von Bibliotheken sind, als sie es selbst oft wissen. Sie sitzen zu Hause, im Büro oder im Internetcafe an einem Computer und recherchieren in Online-Katalogen bzw. Datenbanken nach Publikationen, oft ohne jede Kenntnis davon, wie die Erschließung der Bestände organisiert ist, und nicht selten auch ohne den gewünschten Erfolg - und nicht immer im Bewusstsein, dass ein Misserfolg vorliegt, der sich bei besserer Katalog- und Datenbankkenntnis hätte vermeiden lassen. Katalogkunde offenbart damit das Spiel zwischen gezielter Suche, über das «Stöbern» (Browsing) hin bis zur Serendipity, in der wir, wie einst die jungen Prinzen auf Ceylon (Serendip) hinaus in die Fremde ziehen, um uns von der Großartigkeit der Welt überraschen zu lassen - und Bibliotheken haben im Sinne der Welt 3 von KARL POPPER eine überwältigende Größe und Vielfalt. Bei dem Spiel, der ein Wettkampf um die besten Informationen ist, kann es nicht darum gehen, die Regeln der Preußischen Instruktionen(PI), der Alphabetischen Katalogisierung (RAK), die Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR), die Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog (RSWK), die Prinzipien des Unified Medical Language Systems (UMLS) usw. im einzelnen zu behandeln, sondern vielmehr nur darum, die Grundprinzipien des modernen Kataloges aus ihrer Evolution heraus zu verstehen, um mit ihnen möglichst virtuos umzugehen. Wir hoffen, dass die Katalogkunde dadurch jene Fassung erhalten hat, die den heutigen Bedürfnissen entspricht, und dass sie damit einerseits Inhalte aus dem «Lehrbuch der Bibliotheksverwaltung», und andererseits aus der «Katalogkunde» von KLAUs HALLER (1998) in wichtigen Punkten ergänzt und erweitert.
    Date
    22. 1.2006 19:45:49
  15. Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001) 0.05
    0.049350902 = product of:
      0.19740361 = sum of:
        0.05836024 = weight(_text_:author in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05836024 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15482868 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.3769343 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.022109302 = weight(_text_:26 in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022109302 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.09632795 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09632795 = score(doc=2627,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5359276 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.02060612 = weight(_text_:american in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02060612 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.18834224 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
      0.25 = coord(4/16)
    
    Abstract
    This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
    Date
    26. 8.2005 15:12:32
    Issue
    Final report. Phase I: Descriptive cataloging.
  16. Tennant, R.: 21st century cataloguing (1998) 0.05
    0.046422035 = product of:
      0.2475842 = sum of:
        0.088983946 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088983946 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.49506867 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=2584,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
        0.07930013 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07930013 = score(doc=2584,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5557815 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Observes how traditional cataloguing differs from the use of metadata to describe the materials in a digital library. Introduces the 3 categories of metadata that have been identified: descriptive (also called intellectual), structural, and administrative. Notes that MARC only deals well with intellectual metadata. Discusses some emerging standards that may be to digital libraries what MARC was to print libraries, the best of these being the Dublin Core
  17. López Guillamón, I.: Evolución reciente de la catalogación (2004) 0.04
    0.041490622 = product of:
      0.22128332 = sum of:
        0.053062323 = weight(_text_:26 in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053062323 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Date
    8. 8.2005 14:45:26
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Recent evolution of cataloguing. - Vgl. auch: http://www.um.es/fccd/anales/ad07/ad0709.pdf.
  18. Jeng, L.H.: Knowledge, technology, and research in cataloging (1997) 0.04
    0.039650064 = product of:
      0.3172005 = sum of:
        0.15860026 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15860026 = score(doc=5611,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            1.111563 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
        0.15860026 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15860026 = score(doc=5611,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            1.111563 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Uncertainty over the future of cataloguing and the gap between cataloguing research and practice exist partially because of the rapid change in technology over the 20th century. Explores the role of technology in its relation to cataloguing knowledge and research. Examines the history of technology in cataloguing. A conventional view of cataloguing practice is followed by a critical review of impacts of technology on cataloguing theories. Recommendations are made on some issues of cataloguing research and the directions cataloguing researchers and practitioners should take
  19. Olson, H.A.: Thinking professionals : teaching critical cataloguing (1997) 0.04
    0.03767199 = product of:
      0.20091727 = sum of:
        0.030953024 = weight(_text_:26 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030953024 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.08498212 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08498212 = score(doc=664,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5956042 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.08498212 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08498212 = score(doc=664,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5956042 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloguing education has been the focus of definition and ebate for over a century. Moving beyond cataloguing theory and the creation of records, to the management and process of producing catalogues, increases the complexity of demands placed on professionals and educators. Graduates need to understand their catalogues and integrated systems holistically. This requires a knowledge of each element, of standards governing the creation and maintenance of records, and of the relationship between the record and the catalogue and/or its constituent network. Moreover, the professional must know these things critically, and beyond mere acceptance of standards, so that the catalogue can effectively perform its mediating function between the collection and users
    Date
    20. 3.1998 12:26:11
  20. Ayres, F.H.: Time for change : a new approach to cataloguing concepts (1999) 0.04
    0.036516026 = product of:
      0.19475214 = sum of:
        0.026531162 = weight(_text_:26 in 5347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026531162 = score(doc=5347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.113328174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5347)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=5347,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 5347, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5347)
        0.08411049 = weight(_text_:cataloguing in 5347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08411049 = score(doc=5347,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14268221 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.5894953 = fieldWeight in 5347, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.446252 = idf(docFreq=1408, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5347)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Abstract
    Three factors are likely to force dramatic changes in the libraries of the future. They are the increase in electronic publishing, the digitising of conventional library materials, and the Internet which is creating a second information revolution. New concepts are needed for cataloguing functions in the Internet environment. Cataloguing, now a pre-coordinate function should shift to a post-coordinate activity. Authority control should become an activity of the searching stage rather than the cataloguing stage. Uniform titles will be needed as one of the linking mechanisms. The value of ISBD needs to be justified. Issues connected with the Internet and search engines are explored. A scenario for the Catalogue 2000 is given that envisions the cataloguers' aims being the inclusion of library catalogue material that is relevant but not necessarily in the library.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 16:38:05

Authors

Languages

  • e 100
  • d 30
  • f 3
  • sp 3
  • a 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 125
  • m 9
  • el 7
  • s 4
  • b 3
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…