Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 descriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a angle %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2fdocuments %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1
precises%3a%2f_documents %2f author %26 deskriptive cataloguing %2f rules%3a anglo %2f american cataloguing rules %2f 2nd ed.%22 1

Ding, W.; Marchionini, G.: ¬A comparative study of Web search service performance (1996) 0.02

0.019671623 = product of:
  0.10491532 = sum of:
    0.06673796 = weight(_text_:descriptive in 4807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06673796 = score(doc=4807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17974061 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.3713015 = fieldWeight in 4807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4807)
    0.024727343 = weight(_text_:american in 4807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024727343 = score(doc=4807,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10940785 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032090448 = queryNorm
        0.22601068 = fieldWeight in 4807, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4093587 = idf(docFreq=3973, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4807)
    0.013450016 = product of:
      0.026900033 = sum of:
        0.026900033 = weight(_text_:ed in 4807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026900033 = score(doc=4807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11411327 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032090448 = queryNorm
            0.23573098 = fieldWeight in 4807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5559888 = idf(docFreq=3431, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4807)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.1875 = coord(3/16)

Abstract: Investigates the current state of search services conducted by comparing 3 popular WWW based search services: InfoSeek, Lycos and OpenText. A taxonomy of service features was first created to do a descriptive comparison. A set of 5 questions were used to conduct searches with the 3 services. Each service offered some advantage for specific queries although Lycos and OpenText showed better results for the different precision metrics used in this limited study. There was a low result overlap among the 3 services. None of the services provide good output control for users. Makes recommendations for improvements in display, indexing and updating
Source: Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin